Search

Purpose To establish the prevalence and risk factors for intravitreal dexamethasone implant migration into the anterior chamber in eyes with macular edema. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational chart review of data that included patients with macular edema who had been treated with at least one intravitreal dexamethasone injection. Patients with incomplete chart information during the follow-up period were excluded. Results The prevalence of implant migration in 468 patients, considering the number of injections, was 1.6%, with significant associations between implant migration and cataract surgery (P = 0.043) and intraocular lens status (P = 0.005) and a trend toward statistical significance (P = 0.057) with vitrectomy. A higher rate of implant migration into the anterior chamber was observed in vitrectomized eyes (4.8%) when compared with patients who did not undergo a vitrectomy (1.6%). The implants that migrated were removed with forceps with/without viscoelastic expression or with 20-gauge cannulas connected to the vitreous cutter machine. Conclusion The risk of implant migration into the anterior chamber was 1.6%. Risk factors were a history of cataract surgery or vitrectomy and aphakia. When anterior migration occurs, rapid removal is advised, especially if corneal edema is present.

PURPOSE: There is no established therapy for exudative-hemorrhagic complications in primary retinal arteriolar macroaneurysm (RAM). METHODS: Retrospective multicenter interventional study of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in symptomatic RAMs. Central macular thickness in mum and best-corrected visual acuity in logMar were correlated with the RAM size and distance to the macula. Statistical analyses were performed using paired comparisons and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes (32 patients) were treated with a mean of 2.7 injections over a mean follow-up of 16.6 months. Initial best-corrected visual acuity correlated with the RAM size and distance to the macula (P = 0.02). Central macular thickness decreased by 131,180, and 211 mum at 1, 2, and 3 months after the first injection (P < 0.001). Best-corrected visual acuity improved by 0.47 and 0.38 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study lines at 2 and 3 months (P = 0.005). Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor response correlated with the RAM size (P = 0.04) and the distance to the macula (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic RAMs can be treated successfully with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections, leading to a decrease in macular edema.

PURPOSE To evaluate the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) on retinal neovascularization in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS Retrospective multicenter interventional case series. A chart review was performed of 81 consecutive patients (97 eyes) with retinal neovascularization due to PDR, who received at least 1 IVB injection. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 55.6 ± 11.6 years. The mean number of IVB injections was 4 ± 2.5 injections (range, 1-8 injections) per eye. The mean interval between IVB applications was 3 ± 7 months. The mean duration of follow-up was 29.6 ± 2 months (range, 24-30 months). Best-corrected visual acuity and optical coherence tomography improved statistically significantly (P < 0.0001, both comparisons). Three eyes without previous panretinal photocoagulation ("naive" eyes) and with vitreous hemorrhage did not require vitreoretinal surgery. Five (5.2%) eyes with PDR progressed to tractional retinal detachment requiring vitrectomy. No systemic adverse events were noted. CONCLUSION Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in marked regression of retinal neovascularization in patients with PDR and previous panretinal photocoagulation. Intravitreal bevacizumab in naive eyes resulted in control or regression of 42.1% of eyes without adjunctive laser or vitrectomy during 24 months of follow-up. There were no safety concerns during the 2 years of follow-up of IVB for PDR.

To describe the natural history of eyes with symptomatic idiopathic vitreomacular traction (VMT).Retrospective multicenter study of 168 eyes with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) findings consistent with idiopathic VMT. All eyes were graded according to SD-OCT findings. Grade 1 was defined as incomplete cortical vitreous separation with foveal attachment. Grade 2 was defined as Grade 1 plus intraretinal cysts or clefts. Grade 3 was defined as Grade 2 plus a foveal detachment. All patients were followed for at least 6 months.There were 168 patients (51 men) with a mean age of 68.8 ± 10.7 years. Patients were followed for a mean of 22.7 ± 20.1 months. The mean duration of symptoms before the initial presentation was 3.65 ± 5.42 months. At baseline, 72 eyes had Grade 1, 74 eyes had Grade 2, and 22 eyes had Grade 3 SD-OCT findings. Over the follow-up period, 36 eyes (21.4%) had spontaneous resolution of the VMT with normalization of the foveal anatomy. The mean time to resolution was 12.3 ± 12.6 months. An unfavorable anatomical outcome occurred in 7.7% (13 of 168) of the eyes, with 6 eyes developing a lamellar macular hole and 7 eyes developing a full-thickness macular hole. This occurred at a mean of 10.3 ± 10.7 months after the presentation. Subgroup analysis based on baseline SD-OCT grade showed that 4.1% (3 of 73) of Grade 1 eyes compared with 6.8% (5 of 74) of Grade 2 eyes, and 23.8% (5 of 21) of Grade 3 eyes developed a full-thickness macular hole or lamellar macular hole (P = 0.0109, chi-square test). In the remaining 119 eyes, at the last follow-up, 65 eyes had Grade 1, 42 eyes had Grade 2, and 12 eyes had Grade 3 VMT. On average, the best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.40 ± 0.35 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (Snellen, 20/50) at baseline to 0.35 ± 0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (Snellen, 20/45; P = 0.0372), and the mean central macular thickness improved from 350 ± 132 μm to 323 ± 121 μm.Spontaneous resolution of VMT occurred in 21.4% (36 of 168) of eyes after a mean follow-up of 11.4 ± 12.6 months. An unfavorable anatomical outcome occurred in 7.7% (13 of 168) of eyes. The baseline SD-OCT grade may predict the progression to full-thickness macular hole.

To report clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes from the largest case series of choroidal neovascularization secondary to central serous chorioretinopathy.Retrospective analysis of 46 eyes of 43 consecutive subjects. Collected data included demographic details, history of presenting illness, clinical examination details including visual acuity at presentation and follow-up with imaging and treatment details. Main outcome measures were the proportion of eyes that had improved (3 or more lines), stable (within ±1 line), or decreased (3 or more lines) vision at the final visit as compared with baseline examination. Secondary efficacy outcomes included change in visual acuity at final follow-up, number of injections, treatment-free interval, and adverse events.Mean age was 57.56 years (range 29-79 years). Mean follow-up duration was 38.3 months ± 58.9 months. More than 3 lines of improvement in 12 eyes (26%), vision was stable (within ±1 line) in 19 eyes (41.3%), and3 lines of loss was noted in 6 eyes (13%). Mean change in the number of lines was 1.16 ± 3.74. Mean number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections during the follow-up was 4.45 ± 4.1. The longest treatment-free interval was 8.9 months ± 7.5 months. There were no adverse events noted.Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy as a primary therapy for choroidal neovascularization secondary to central serous chorioretinopathy is safe and efficacious, without any serious adverse events.

To determine the effects of lens status on the success rate of primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using either perfluoropropane gas (C3F8) or silicone oil (SO) tamponade.A retrospective chart analysis was made of 97 eyes from 92 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with no proliferative vitreoretinopathy that were treated with primary 23-gauge PPV. Eyes included in this were phakic (n = 28), pseudophakic (n = 41), or phakic eyes subject to simultaneous phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and PPV during primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair (n = 28). Tamponade at the end of PPV was with either C3F8 (n = 65) or SO (n = 32). Success was defined as retinal reattachment at 1 year follow-up after a single procedure in eyes submitted to C3F8 injection; in eyes treated with SO injection, the success rate was defined as retina reattached 1 year after oil removal. Statistical comparisons were made between groups using chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and multivariate analysis. All eyes were operated by 2 experienced retina surgeons and had a minimum follow-up of 12 months.The vitreoretinal redetachment rate in eyes subjected to C3F8 tamponade was significantly higher (28.6%) for phakic eyes (P = 0.011) compared with pseudophakic or phakic eyes that underwent to phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (4.5%). Eyes in which SO was used at the end of the surgical procedure demonstrated a similar trend of higher reoperation rates in phakic eyes (28.6%) compared with pseudophakic or phakic eyes (8%) subjected to phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation; however, no statistically significant difference was observed (P = 0.201). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in relation to the number of tears (P = 0.863) and their location (inferior: P = 0.189, superior: P = 0.708, nasal: P = 0.756, and temporal: P = 0.08).The success rates of primary 23-gauge PPV with either C3F8 or SO tamponade in pseudophakic eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was higher than the same procedure performed in phakic eyes. Still, the retrospective and limited data presented is too preliminary to suggest or recommend that practitioners perform simultaneous combined cataract surgery with retinal detachment and requires further studies in a larger and prospective design to confirm these present findings.

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to report the short-term visual and anatomical outcomes after intravitreal injections of two different tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema.Methods:An interventional, retrospective, multicenter study of 39 eyes with r

The purpose of this study was to compare the injection burden, central macular thickness (CMT), and change in best-corrected visual acuity after injecting 1.25 mg or 2.5 mg bevacizumab as needed in patients with primary macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.This is an interventional, retrospective, comparative multicenter study of 86 eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion that were treated primarily with intravitreal bevacizumab (44 eyes, 1.25 mg; 42 eyes, 2.5 mg). The main outcome measures were the CMT and the change of best-corrected visual acuity at 24 months.All patients completed at least 24 months of follow-up. The mean number of injections per eye were 7.2 for the 1.25-mg dose group and 8.1 for the 2.5-mg dose group (P = 0.4492). At 24 months, in the 1.25-mg dose group, the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity improved from baseline 0.35 +/- 0.57 units (P0.0001) versus 0.27 +/- 0.68 units for the 2.5-mg dose group (P0.0001). These differences were not statistically significant between both dose groups. In the 1.25-mg dose group, 25 (56.8%) eyes gainedor=3 lines of Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity and 6 (13.6%) lostor=3 lines of Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity. In the 2.5-mg dose group, 24 (57.1 %) eyes improvedor=3 lines of Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity and 7 (16.7%) lostor=3 lines of Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity. The CMT in the 1.25-mg dose group improved from 635 +/- 324 microm to 264 +/- 160 microm (P0.0001) versus 528 +/- microm to 293 +/- 137 microm in the 2.5-mg dose group (P0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between both dose groups with regard to the CMT reduction.Intravitreal bevacizumab at doses up to 2.5 mg seems to be effective in improving visual acuity and reducing CMT in macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. There were no statistically significant differences between the two dose groups with regard to the number of injections, CMT, and change in visual acuity.

The purpose of this study was to compare the injection burden, central macular thickness (CMT), and change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after injecting 1.25 mg or 2.5 mg of bevacizumab as needed in patients with primary macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.An interventional, retrospective, comparative multicenter study was conducted of 63 eyes with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion that were treated primarily with intravitreal bevacizumab (38 eyes, 1.25 mg; 25 eyes, 2.5 mg). The main outcome measures were the CMT and the change of BCVA at 24 months.All patients completed at least 24 months of follow-up. The mean number of injections per eye was 3.6 in the 1.25-mg group and 4.3 in the 2.5-mg group (P = 0.4770). At 24 months, in the 1.25-mg group, the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA improved from baseline 0.38 +/- 0.63 (P0.0001) units to 0.64 +/- 0.6 units for the 2.5-mg group (P0.0001). In the 1.25-mg group, 26 (68%) eyes gainedor =3 of Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity and 2 (5%) eyes lostor =3 lines of Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity. In the 2.5-mg group, 18 (72%) eyes improvedor =3 of Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity, and none of the eyes lostor =3 lines of Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity. The CMT in the 1.25-mg group improved from 453 +/- 140 microm to 244 +/- 125 microm (P0.0001) versus 444 +/- 175 microm to 234 +/- 80 microm in the 2.5-mg group (P0.0001). There were no cases of endophthalmitis. No systemic adverse events were reported.Intravitreal bevacizumab at doses up to 2.5 mg seems to be effective in improving BCVA and reducing CMT in macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. No statistically significant differences were found between the two dose groups with regard to the number of injections, CMT, and change in BCVA.

PURPOSE: To report the visual outcomes and ocular complications of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in the treatment of the nonproliferative stage of type II idiopathic parafoveal telangiectasia (IPT). METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, uncontrolled interventional case series of 19 eyes of 14 consecutive patients with the nonproliferative stage of IPT that had undergone at least one intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide. Demographic, medical, and ocular data were obtained through chart review. The main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity at several timepoints of follow up and ocular complications. RESULTS: At baseline the mean logMAR visual acuity was 0.83 ± 0.41 (Snellen 20/135, range 0.3-2). After an average follow-up of 21.2 months (range 6-44 months), the mean logMAR visual acuity remained essentially unchanged from baseline. At 3 months, the logMAR visual acuity was 0.86 ± 0.44 (Snellen 20/145, P = 0.8378), at 6 months 0.86 ± 0.42 (Snellen 20/145, P = 0.8149), at 12 months 0.87 ± 0.46 (Snellen 20/148, P > 0.9999), at 18 months 0.84 ± 0.35 (Snellen 20/138, P = 0.8385), and at the last follow-up 0.82 ± 0.44 (Snellen 20/132, P = 0.9301). Seven eyes were reinjected once. Ten of 19 eyes (53%) developed cataract (3 eyes underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) and 7 of 19 eyes (37%) had an elevated intraocular pressure, none of which required surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: IVTA does not seem to improve visual acuity in most eyes with the nonproliferative stage of IPT. © The Ophthalmic Communications Society, Inc.

PURPOSE: To report the 6-month anatomical and visual outcomes after injecting two different doses of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: An interventional, retrospective multicenter study of 45 eyes that were treated with at least one intravitreal injection (24 eyes, 1.25 mg; 21 eyes, 2.5 mg) of bevacizumab is reported. The main outcome measures were the central 1-mm macular thickness (CMT) and the change in ETDRS lines of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months. RESULTS: Forty-five eyes were injected on average 26.1 months (range, 3-86 months) after the diagnosis. The average follow-up was 35.2 weeks (range, 24-52 weeks). All patients completed at least 6 months of follow-up. In the 1.25-mg dose group, at 1 month, there was an average gain of 4.5 lines of BCVA; at 3 months, 5.1 lines of BCVA; and at 6 months, 5.1 lines of BCVA (P less than 0.005). In the 2.5-mg dose group, at 1 month, there was an average gain of 2.3 lines of BCVA; at 3 months, 3.8 lines of BCVA; and at 6 months, 4.8 lines of BCVA (P = 0.05). In the 1.25-mg dose group, the mean CMT ± SD decreased from 461 ± 211 ?m at baseline to 321 ± 152 ?m at 1 month, 273 ± 99 ?m at 3 months, and 277 ± 114 ?m at 6 months (P = 0.0002). In the 2.5-mg group, the mean CMT ± SD decreased from 385 ± 168 ?m at baseline to 279 ± 111 ?m at 1 month, 249 ± 97 ?m at 3 months, and 240 ± 93 ?m at 6 months (P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences between the two dose groups with regard to the number of injections and anatomical and functional outcomes. Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab at doses up to 2.5 mg appears to be effective in improving BCVA and reducing CMT in BRVO in the short term. Multiple injections are needed in a large number of eyes for continued control of macular edema and preservation of visual acuity in the short term. Longer studies are needed to determine what role if any intravitreal injection of bevacizumab may play in the long-term treatment of this condition. © The Ophthalmic Communications Society, Inc.