Search

As asphyxial cardiac arrest is more common than cardiac arrest from a primary cardiac event in paediatric cardiac arrest, effective ventilation is important during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We aimed to determine optimal dispatcher-assisted CPR instructions for bystanders after paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).We analysed the records of 8172 children who received bystander dispatcher-assisted CPR. Data were obtained from an All-Japan Utstein-style registry from 2005 to 2017. Patients were divided into conventional CPR and compression-only CPR groups. The primary study endpoint was 1-month neurologically intact survival, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 (CPC 1-2).The 1-month CPC 1-2 rate was significantly higher in the dispatcher-assisted conventional CPR group than in the dispatcher-assisted compression-only CPR group (before propensity score matching, 5.7% [175/3077] vs. 3.1% [160/5095], p 0.0001, adjusted odds ratio 2.48, 95% confidence interval 1.19-3.22; after propensity score matching, 6.0% [156/2618] vs. 2.6% [69/2618], p 0.0001, adjusted odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.76-3.32). In most subgroup analyses after matching, dispatcher-assisted conventional CPR had a higher CPC 1-2 rate than dispatcher-assisted compression-only CPR; however, CPC 1-2 rates were similar between the two groups for patients with an initial shockable rhythm, those with total prehospital CPR time ≥ 20 min, those receiving public access defibrillation, advanced airway management, or adrenaline administration.Within the limitations of this retrospective observational study, dispatcher-assisted conventional CPR was preferable to dispatcher-assisted compression-only CPR as optimal CPR instructions for coaching callers to perform bystander CPR.

Purpose To investigate the impacts of emergency calls made using mobile phones on the quality of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) that were not witnessed by emergency medical service (EMS). Methods In this prospective study, we collected data for 2530 DA-CPR-attempted medical emergency cases (517 using mobile phones and 2013 using landline phones) and 2980 non-EMS-witnessed OHCAs (600 using mobile phones and 2380 using landline phones). Time factors and quality of DA-CPR, backgrounds of callers and outcomes of OHCAs were compared between mobile and landline phone groups. Results Emergency calls are much more frequently placed beside the arrest victim in mobile phone group (52.7% vs. 17.2%). The positive predictive value and acceptance rate of DA-CPR in mobile phone group (84.7% and 80.6%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in landline group (79.2% and 70.9%). The proportion of good-quality bystander CPR in mobile phone group was significantly higher than that in landline group (53.5% vs. 45.0%). When analysed for all non-EMS-witnessed OHCAs, rates of 1-month survival and 1-year neurologically favourable survival in mobile phone group (7.8% and 3.5%, respectively) were higher than those in landline phone group (4.6% and 1.9%; p, Embargo Period 12 months

To compare the factors associated with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) among three time-distance areas (defined as interquartile range of time for emergency medical services response to patient's side).From a nationwide, prospectively collected data on 716,608 OHCAs between 2007 and 2012, this study analyzed 193,914 bystander-witnessed OHCAs without pre-hospital physician involvement.Overall neurologically favourable 1-month survival rates were 7.4%, 4.1% and 1.7% for close, intermediate and remote areas, respectively. We classified BCPR by type (compression-only vs. conventional) and by dispatcher-assisted CPR (DA-CPR) (with vs. without); the effects on time-distance area survival were analyzed by BCPR classification. Association of each BCPR classification with survival was affected by time-distance area and arrest aetiology (p0.05). The survival rates in the remote area were much higher with conventional BCPR than with compression-only BCPR (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval, 1.26; 1.05-1.51) and with BCPR without DA-CPR than with BCPR with DA-CPR (1.54; 1.29-1.82). Accordingly, we classified BCPR into five groups (no BCPR, compression-only with DA-CPR, conventional with DA-CPR, compression-only without DA-CPR, and conventional without DA-CPR) and analyzed for associations with survival, both cardiac and non-cardiac related, in each time-distance area by multivariate logistic regression analysis. In the remote area, conventional BCPR without DA-CPR significantly improved survival after OHCAs of cardiac aetiology, compared with all the other BCPR groups. Other correctable factors associated with survival were short collapse-to-call and call-to-first CPR intervals.Every effort to recruit trained citizens initiating conventional BCPR should be made in remote time-distance areas.

Aim To determine the effectiveness of ventilations in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and to identify the factors associated with ventilation-only BCPR. Methods From out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) data prospectively collected from 2005 to 2011 in Japan, we extracted data for 210,134 bystander-witnessed OHCAs with complete datasets but no prehospital involvement of physician [no BCPR, 115,733; ventilation-only, 2093; compression-only, 61,075; and conventional (compressions+ventilations) BCPR, 31,233] and determined the factors associated with 1-month neurologically favourable survival using simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses. In 91,885 patients with known BCPR durations, we determined the factors associated with ventilation-only BCPR. Results The rate of survival in the no BCPR, ventilation-only, compression-only and conventional group was 2.8%, 3.9%, 4.5% and 5.0%, respectively. After adjustment for other factors associated with outcomes, the survival rate in the ventilation-only group was higher than that in the no BCPR group (adjusted OR; 95% CI, 1.29; 1.01–1.63), but lower than that in the compression-only (0.76; 0.59–0.96) or conventional groups (0.70; 0.55–0.89). Conventional CPR had the highest OR for survival in almost all OHCA subgroups. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for survival after dividing BCPR into ventilation and compression components was 1.19 (1.11–1.27) and 1.60 (1.51–1.69), respectively. Older guidelines, female sex, younger patient age, bystander-initiated CPR without instruction, early BCPR and short BCPR duration were associated with ventilation-only BCPR. Conclusions Ventilation is a significant component of BCPR, but alone is less effective than compression in improving neurologically favourable survival after OHCAs.

Review: An increased number of rescuers may improve the survival rate from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs). The majority of OHCAs occur at home and are handled by family members. Materials and methods: Data from 5078 OHCAs that were witnessed by citizens and unwitnessed by citizens or emergency medical technicians from January 2004 to March 2010 were prospectively collected. The number of rescuers was identified in 4338 OHCAs and was classified into two (single rescuer (N = 2468) and multiple rescuers (N = 1870)) or three (single rescuer, two rescuers (N = 887) and three or more rescuers (N = 983)) groups. The backgrounds, characteristics and outcomes of OHCAs were compared between the two groups and among the three groups. Results: When all OHCAs were collectively analysed, an increased number of rescuers was associated with better outcomes (one-year survival and one-year survival with favourable neurological outcomes were 3.1% and 1.9% for single rescuers, 4.1% and 2.0% for two rescuers, and 6.0% and 4.6% for three or more rescuers, respectively (p = 0.0006 and p < 0.0001)). A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of multiple rescuers is an independent factor that is associated with one-year survival (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.539 (1.088-2.183)). When only OHCAs that occurred at home were analysed (N = 2902), the OHCAs that were handled by multiple rescuers were associated with higher incidences of bystander CPR but were not associated with better outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, an increased number of rescuers improves the outcomes of OHCAs. However, this beneficial effect is absent in OHCAs that occur at home. © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Aim To investigate whether the bystander–patient relationship affects bystander response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and patient outcomes depending on the time of day. Methods This population-based observational study in Japan involving 139,265 bystander-witnessed OHCAs (90,426 family members, 10,479 friends/colleagues, and 38,360 others) without prehospital physician involvement was conducted from 2005 to 2009. Factors associated with better bystander response [early emergency call and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR)] and 1-month neurologically favourable survival were assessed. Results The rates of dispatcher-assisted CPR during daytime (7:00–18:59) and nighttime (19:00–6:59) were highest in family members (45.6% and 46.1%, respectively, for family members; 28.7% and 29.2%, respectively, for friends/colleagues; and 28.1% and 25.3%, respectively, for others). However, the BCPR rates were lowest in family members (35.5% and 37.8%, respectively, for family members; 43.7% and 37.8%, respectively, for friends/colleagues; and 59.3% and 50.0%, respectively, for others). Large delays (≥5 min) in placing emergency calls and initiating BCPR were most frequent in family members. The overall survival rate was lowest (2.7%) for family members and highest (9.1%) for friends/colleagues during daytime. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the effect of bystander relationship on survival was significant only during daytime [adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for survival from daytime OHCAs with family as reference were 1.51 (1.36–1.68) for friends/colleagues and 1.23 (1.13–1.34) for others]. Conclusions Family members are least likely to perform BCPR and OHCAs witnessed by family members are least likely to survive during daytime. Different strategies are required for family-witnessed OHCAs.

Purpose: Early cardiopulmonary (CPR) is the second link in the chain of survival, but the execution of CPR causes fatigue.1 However, it is possible that rescuers are already tired at the time of starting CPR.2 This can be the case of a lifeguard. Nowadays, different automatic compression device have appeared in the market.3 This mechanisms are able to realize quality chest compressions. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of an automatic compression device on the quality of chest compressions after a water rescue. Materials and methods: Twenty lifeguards form the sample of this study. They had to carry out two tests. The first test consisted in fiveminutes of CPR (rested). Then, the samplewas divided into two groups. In the second test, they realized a water rescue (50m running – 75m swimming – 75m dragging manikin) and five minutes of CPR. One group realized CPR after water rescue with an automatic compression device, the Lund University of Cardiac Arrest System (LUCAS). The data CPR were recorded with the manikin Laerdal Resusci Anne Wireless SkillReporter. Results:We found differences in the percentage of correct chest compressions. Lifeguards reached 71.1% of correct compressions in rested conditions. After water rescue, the percentage decreases to 62.4% (p

1. Orkin, Aaron M. Push hard, push fast, if you’re downtown: a citation review of urban-centrism in American and European basic life support guidelines. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013;21:32 [PubMed]. 2. Moller Nielsen A, Lou Isbye D, Knudsen Lippert F, Rasmussen LS. Engaging a whole community in resuscitation. Resuscitation 2012;83:1067–71, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.04.012. Epub 2012 May 3.

it canbe reducedbymild therapeutic hypothermia,we investigated the prognostic value of cell free DNA at ICU admission and 24hours after admission. Methods:A prospective studywas conducted in three intensive care units in university hospitals. We included patients resuscitated from a non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Patient data were collected in accordance with the Utstein protocol. Blood for cell-free DNA quantification was sampled at admission and at 24±1hafter admission.Outcomemeasureswerehospitalmorality and cerebral performance expressed with CPC scale at discharge. Results: Inclusion criteriaweremet in 67 patients; 24-hmortality was 37.3% and hospital mortality 71.6%. The following variables were associatedwith24-hmortality inunivariate analysis: asystole as thepresenting rhythm, “no-flow” time, “low-flow” time and cellfree DNA at admission (median 0.081 in survivors vs. 0.160ng/ l in non-survivors; P=0.038).Multivariate analysis that included the above variables showed that no-flow time and low-flow timewere independently associated with 24-h mortality. Hospital mortality was associated with following factors: “low flow” time, coronary intervention, cell-free DNA at ICU admission and at 24h after admission (median 0.042 vs. 0.188ng/ l; P=0.048). ROC curve for cell-free DNA 24h after admission showed sensitivity of 81.0% and specificity of 78.3% for the cut-off value of 0.115ng/ l. Multivariate analysis showed that “low-flow” time and cell-free DNA at 24h after ICU admission were independently associated with hospital mortality. Cell freeDNAshoweddifferent dynamics inpatientswho wereandwhowerenot treatedwithmild therapeutichypothermia. Conclusions: Cell-free DNA quantity at ICU admission and 24h after admission is associated with hospital mortality. Further studies will need to additionally investigate possible practical use of this new laboratory marker in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.