1. Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations
- Author
-
Jasmeet Soar, Katherine M. Berg, Lars W. Andersen, Bernd W. Böttiger, Sofia Cacciola, Clifton W. Callaway, Keith Couper, Tobias Cronberg, Sonia D’Arrigo, Charles D. Deakin, Michael W. Donnino, Ian R. Drennan, Asger Granfeldt, Cornelia W.E. Hoedemaekers, Mathias J. Holmberg, Cindy H. Hsu, Marlijn Kamps, Szymon Musiol, Kevin J. Nation, Robert W. Neumar, Tonia Nicholson, Brian J. O’Neil, Quentin Otto, Edison Ferreira de Paiva, Michael J.A. Parr, Joshua C. Reynolds, Claudio Sandroni, Barnaby R. Scholefield, Markus B. Skrifvars, Tzong-Luen Wang, Wolfgang A. Wetsch, Joyce Yeung, Peter T. Morley, Laurie J. Morrison, Michelle Welsford, Mary Fran Hazinski, Jerry P. Nolan, Issa Mahmoud, Monica E. Kleinman, Giuseppe Ristagno, Julie Arafeh, Justin L. Benoit, Maureen Chase, Bryan L. Fischberg, Gustavo E. Flores, Mark S. Link, Joseph P. Ornato, Sarah M. Perman, Comilla Sasson, Carolyn M. Zelop, HUS Emergency Medicine and Services, Department of Diagnostics and Therapeutics, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Area
- Subjects
Emergency Medical Services ,Resuscitation ,NEURON-SPECIFIC ENOLASE ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Emergency Nursing ,FIBRILLATION WAVE-FORM ,TARGETED TEMPERATURE MANAGEMENT ,0302 clinical medicine ,Emergency medical services ,Vasoconstrictor Agents ,echocardiography ,FOCUSED ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION ,3. Good health ,AHA Scientific Statements ,Systematic review ,Cardiovascular Diseases ,Emergency Medicine ,medicine.symptom ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,arrhythmias ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Consensus ,cardiopulmonary arrest ,postresuscitation care ,cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care ,Article ,post–cardiac arrest care ,03 medical and health sciences ,Physiology (medical) ,sudden cardiac arrest ,Settore MED/41 - ANESTESIOLOGIA ,medicine ,Humans ,SEQUENTIAL EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION ,Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ,Intensive care medicine ,TIDAL CARBON-DIOXIDE ,REFRACTORY VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION ,business.industry ,HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST ,Basic life support ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Sudden cardiac arrest ,3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology ,ventricular fibrillation ,Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ,Heart Arrest ,Advanced life support ,Life Support Care ,post-cardiac arrest care ,3121 General medicine, internal medicine and other clinical medicine ,BRAIN COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ,MULTIMODAL OUTCOME PREDICTION ,prognostication ,business ,Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest ,Neonatal resuscitation ,Systematic Reviews as Topic ,Defibrillators - Abstract
This2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendationsfor advanced life support includes updates on multiple advanced life support topics addressed with 3 different types of reviews. Topics were prioritized on the basis of both recent interest within the resuscitation community and the amount of new evidence available since any previous review. Systematic reviews addressed higher-priority topics, and included double-sequential defibrillation, intravenous versus intraosseous route for drug administration during cardiac arrest, point-of-care echocardiography for intra-arrest prognostication, cardiac arrest caused by pulmonary embolism, postresuscitation oxygenation and ventilation, prophylactic antibiotics after resuscitation, postresuscitation seizure prophylaxis and treatment, and neuroprognostication. New or updated treatment recommendations on these topics are presented. Scoping reviews were conducted for anticipatory charging and monitoring of physiological parameters during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Topics for which systematic reviews and new Consensuses on Science With Treatment Recommendations were completed since 2015 are also summarized here. All remaining topics reviewed were addressed with evidence updates to identify any new evidence and to help determine which topics should be the highest priority for systematic reviews in the next 1 to 2 years.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF