Search

Summary: Background: Inhaled glucocorticosteroids reduce airway inflammation in asthma patients, thereby improving lung function and reducing airway hyperresponsiveness and symptoms. The response to glucocorticosteroids can be measured with the glucocorticosteroid skin-blanching test. We investigated if asthmatics have a lower skin-blanching response to glucocorticosteroids than non-asthmatic subjects and if asthmatics with airway obstruction have lower skin-blanching response than those without obstruction. Finally, we assessed which clinical and inflammatory parameters influence the variability in skin-blanching response. Methods: We evaluated the skin-blanching response to topical budesonide in a large group of 315 well-characterized asthmatics and their relatives (asthma n = 114, healthy n = 140, other = 61) Results: The skin-blanching scores of the asthma probands and their healthy spouses were not significantly different. The skin-blanching score of patients with FEV1 < 80% predicted was lower than of patients without obstruction. Lower skin-blanching score was significantly associated with lower FEV1 %predicted, higher age, female gender, absence of allergy and summer season, but not with use of inhaled or oral glucocorticosteroids or packyears smoking. Conclusions: Asthmatics do not have lower skin-blanching response to glucocorticosteroids than healthy subjects. Furthermore, lower skin-blanching response to glucocorticosteroids is associated with lower FEV1, female gender, higher age and the absence of allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Patient-reported outcomes provide new insights into the dynamics of asthma management. Further to asthma control and quality of life, self-reported side effects of treatment can be assessed with the validated Inhaled Corticosteroid Questionnaire (ICQ)., Objectives: To compare patient-reported side effects between the inhaled corticosteroids ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate., Methods: Patients with moderate or moderate-to-severe asthma, pre-treated with a constant dose and type of medication, were randomized in three separate studies: 1) once daily ciclesonide 320 μg (n = 234) or twice daily fluticasone propionate 200 μg (n = 240); 2) twice daily ciclesonide 320 μg (n = 255) or twice daily fluticasone propionate 375 μg (n = 273); and 3) twice daily ciclesonide 320 μg (n = 259) or twice daily fluticasone propionate 500 μg (n = 244). Patients rated the side effect questions of the 15 domain ICQ on a 7-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 6 = a very great deal) during scheduled visits., Results: The majority of side effect scores remained similar with ciclesonide but worsened statistically significantly with fluticasone propionate from baseline to the end of the study in within-treatment analyses. In between-treatment analyses of studies 1 and 3 ciclesonide significantly improved total side effect scores (p < 0.025) and 14 out of 30 individual local and systemic domain scores (p < 0.025) compared with fluticasone propionate. In Study 2, although ciclesonide improved the majority of scores compared with fluticasone propionate only 'oropharyngeal itching' reached statistical significance (p < 0.025, one-sided)., Conclusion: Patient-perceived side effects differ depending on the type of inhaled corticosteroids used. Patients with moderate-to-severe asthma report less intense side effects assessed with ICQ with ciclesonide than with fluticasone propionate., Clinical Trial Registration: The reported trials were completed before July 1 2005 and, therefore, are not registered., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Virtually all asthma patients use brorichodilators. Formoterol and salbutamol have a rapid onset of bronchodilating effect, whereas salmeterol acts slower. We studied the onset of improvement of dyspnoea sensation after inhalation with these bronchodilators and placebo to reverse a methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction as a model for an acute asthma attack. Seventeen patients with asthma completed this randomised, double-blind, crossover, double-dummy study. On 4 test days, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and Borg score were recorded and patients were challenged with methacholine until FEV1 fell with > or = 30% of baseline value. Thereafter, formoterol 12 microg via Turbuhaler, salbutamol 50 microg via Turbuhaler, salmeterol 50 microg via Diskhaler, or placebo was inhaled. FEV1 and Borg scores were assessed during the following 60 min. The first sensed improvement of Borg score was significantly (P<0.05) faster achieved with formoterol (geometric mean (Gmean) (range) 1.5 (1-40) min) and salbutamol 1.8 (1-10) min than with salmeterol 4.5 (1-30) min and placebo 3.4 (1-40) min. The Borg score returned significantly faster to the baseline value with formoterol, salbutamol, and salmeterol (Gmean time 13.8 (1-75), 13.4 (1-60), and 18.0 (1-75) min, respectively) than with placebo (33.6 (1-75 min). Formoterol and salbutamol act significantly faster than salmeterol in relieving dyspnoea induced by methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, in patients with asthma.