Search

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of patients admitted to a respiratory ICU (RICU) have been evaluated in the past, but no study has considered the influence of location prior to RICU admission. METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data from 326 consecutive patients admitted to a 7-bed RICU. The primary end points were survival and severity of morbidity-related complications, evaluated according to the patient's location prior to RICU admission. Three admission pathways were considered: step-down for patients transferred from the ICUs of our hospital; step-up for patients coming from our respiratory wards or other medical wards; and directly for patients coming from the emergency department. The secondary end point was the potential influence of several risk factors for morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 326 subjects, 92 (28%) died. Overall, subjects admitted in a step-up process had a significantly higher mortality (P < .001) than subjects in the other groups. The mortality rate was 64% for subjects admitted from respiratory ward, 43% for those from medical wards, and 18% for subjects from both ICU and emergency department (respiratory ward vs medical ward P = .04, respiratory ward vs emergency department P < .001, respiratory ward vs ICU P < .001, medical ward vs emergency department P < .001, and medical ward vs ICU P < .001). Subjects admitted from a respiratory ward had a lower albumin level, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was significantly higher in subjects following a step-up admission. About 30% of the subjects admitted from a respiratory ward received noninvasive ventilation as a "ceiling treatment." The highest odds ratios related to survival were subject location prior to RICU admission and female sex. Lack of use of noninvasive ventilation, younger age, female sex, higher albumin level, lower Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, higher Barthel score, and absence of chronic heart failure were also statistically associated with a lower risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: The pathway of admission to a RICU is a determinant of outcome. Patients following a step-up pattern are more likely to die. Other major determinants of survival are age, nutritional status and female sex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Emphysema, especially in the upper lobes, is frequently observed in association with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the combination of emphysema plus IPF has received little attention., Objective: To investigate the additional functional impairment from emphysema in IPF patients., Methods: Twenty-one patients (mean age 66 y, 20 men) (Group I) who had both IPF (mean 35% of total lung volume) and emphysema (mean 14% of total lung volume) were compared to a group of 21 subjects who had IPF but no emphysema (Group II). The groups were matched for (among other criteria) the total extent of disease. Pulmonary function tests, Medical Research Council dyspnea score, 6-min walk test, and radiographic extents of both IPF and emphysema were obtained for each patient. The Composite Physiologic Index was calculated. In the total population (n = 42), the independent contributions of IPF and emphysema to several physiologic variables were investigated by using stepwise multiple regression analysis., Results: Despite the limited extent of emphysema, Groups I and II had similar physiologic impairment. Only residual volume and total lung capacity were significantly higher in Group I. According to stepwise multiple regression analysis, the extent of IPF and either the presence or the extent of emphysema in the total population were independent and significant predictors of dyspnea score, 6-min walk test, P(aO2), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity adjusted for alveolar volume (gas-transfer coefficient), and residual volume. The Composite Physiologic Index was closely related to the extent of IPF (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001) and to the dyspnea score (rho = 0.59, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In former smokers with IPF, the presence and the extent of emphysema have a profound influence on physiologic function in terms of both further impairment and confounding effects.