1. Simplifying medication regimens for residents of aged care facilities: Pharmacist and physician use of a structured five-step medication simplification tool.
- Author
-
Sluggett JK, Stasinopoulos J, Sylvester C, Wong WJ, Hillen J, Hughes GA, Yu S, Clark M, Bell JS, Corlis M, Teng LS, Newton L, Piovezan RD, Yu D, Carter L, and Soulsby N
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Male, Female, Aged, 80 and over, General Practitioners, Geriatricians, Medication Therapy Management organization & administration, Physicians, Professional Role, Pharmacists organization & administration, Homes for the Aged
- Abstract
Background: Pharmacist-led medication regimen simplification using a structured approach can reduce unnecessary medication regimen complexity in residential aged care facilities (RACFs), but no studies have investigated simplification by different health professionals, nor the extent to which simplification is recommended during comprehensive medication reviews., Objectives: To compare medication regimen simplification opportunities identified by pharmacists, general medical practitioners (GPs), and geriatricians and to determine if pharmacists identified simplification opportunities during routinely conducted comprehensive medication reviews in RACFs for these same residents., Methods: Three pharmacists, three GPs and three geriatricians independently applied the Medication Regimen Simplification Guide for Residential Aged CarE (MRS GRACE) to medication data for 83 residents taking medications at least twice daily. Interrater agreement was calculated using Fleiss's kappa. Pharmacist medication review reports for the same 83 residents were then examined to identify if the pharmacists conducting these reviews had recommended any of the simplification strategies., Results: Overall, 77 residents (92.8 %) taking medications at least twice daily could have their medication regimen simplified by at least one health professional. Pharmacists independently simplified 53.0-77.1 % of medication regimens (Κ = 0.60, 95%CI 0.46-0.75, indicating substantial agreement), while GPs simplified 74.7-89.2 % (Κ = 0.44, 95%CI 0.24-0.64, moderate agreement) and geriatricians simplified 41.0-66.3 % (Κ = 0.30, 95%CI 0.16-0.44, fair agreement). No simplification recommendations were included in the reports previously prepared by pharmacists as part of the comprehensive medication reviews undertaken for these residents., Conclusion: Pharmacists, GPs, and geriatricians can all identify medication regimen simplification opportunities, although these opportunities differ within and between professional groups. Although opportunities to simplify medication regimens during comprehensive medication reviews exist, simplification is not currently routinely recommended by pharmacists performing these reviews in Australian RACFs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JKS, WJW, and NS are accredited to perform comprehensive medication reviews in Australian RACFs. JKS is a non-executive director of Southern Cross Care SA, NT & VIC [aged care provider organization]. NS is a member of clinical governance committees for Estia, Eldercare, Anglicare, BUPA, Bolton Clarke, and Calvary Aged Care [aged care provider organizations] and is a non-executive director of the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. NS and LC are employed by an organization providing pharmacist services to RACFs (Ward Medication Management) which provided data for this study, and JH and WJW were previously employed by this organization. JSB has received grant funding or consulting funds from the NHMRC, Victorian GovernmentDepartment of Health and Human Services, Dementia Australia Research Foundation, Yulgilbar Foundation, Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia, GlaxoSmithKline Supported Studies Programme, Amgen, and several aged care provider organizations unrelated to this work (all grants and consulting funds were paid to the employing institution)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF