1. Is Endoscopic Transurethral Incision Really Effective for Boys with Refractory Daytime Incontinence?
- Author
-
Morizawa, Yosuke, Aoki, Katsuya, Hori, Shunta, Gotoh, Daisuke, Miyake, Makito, Nakai, Yasushi, Torimoto, Kazumasa, Tanaka, Nobumichi, and Fujimoto, Kiyohide
- Subjects
pediatric ,daytime incontinence ,Research and Reports in Urology ,enuresis ,TUI ,Original Research - Abstract
Yosuke Morizawa, Katsuya Aoki, Shunta Hori, Daisuke Gotoh, Makito Miyake, Yasushi Nakai, Kazumasa Torimoto, Nobumichi Tanaka, Kiyohide Fujimoto Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, JapanCorrespondence: Kiyohide FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, JapanTel +81-744-22-3051Fax +81-744-22-9282Email kiyokun@naramed-u.ac.jpPurpose: To determine the clinical efficacy of endoscopic transurethral incision (TUI) for boys with refractory daytime incontinence due to a posterior urethral valve with or without nocturnal enuresis.Patients and Methods: A total of 20 boys with daytime incontinence were assessed. Twelve boys underwent TUI (TUI+ group) and eight boys continued receiving oral drugs (TUI- group). The primary endpoint was the cure rate associated with TUI or NE in both groups.Results: Only two boys achieved daytime continence 6 months after TUI, but no boys were cured of nocturnal enuresis 6 months after TUI. The median time to daytime continence was significantly longer in the TUI+ than in the TUI- group (52 vs 27 months, respectively; log rank P = 0.041) and the median time to dry nights was significantly longer in the TUI+ than in the TUI- group (56 vs 36 months, respectively; log rank P = 0.021).Conclusion: TUI might be not effective in boys with refractory daytime incontinence.Keywords: pediatric, daytime incontinence, enuresis, TUI
- Published
- 2020