1. Biological variability hampers the use of skeletal staining methods in zebrafish embryo developmental toxicity assays.
- Author
-
Hoyberghs J, Ball J, Trznadel M, Beekhuijzen M, Burbank M, Wilhelmi P, Muriana A, Powles-Glover N, Letamendia A, and Van Cruchten S
- Subjects
- Animals, Staining and Labeling, Bone and Bones drug effects, Bone and Bones abnormalities, Embryonic Development drug effects, Fluoresceins toxicity, Anthraquinones toxicity, Zebrafish embryology, Teratogens toxicity, Embryo, Nonmammalian drug effects, Toxicity Tests methods
- Abstract
Zebrafish embryo assays are used by pharmaceutical and chemical companies as new approach methodologies (NAMs) in developmental toxicity screening. Despite an overall high concordance of zebrafish embryo assays with in vivo mammalian studies, false negative and false positive results have been reported. False negative results in risk assessment models are of particular concern for human safety, as developmental anomalies may be missed. Interestingly, for several chemicals and drugs that were reported to be false negative in zebrafish, skeletal findings were noted in the in vivo studies. As the number of skeletal endpoints assessed in zebrafish is very limited compared to the in vivo mammalian studies, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the sensitivity could be increased by including a skeletal staining method. Three staining methods were tested on zebrafish embryos that were exposed to four teratogens that caused skeletal anomalies in rats and/or rabbits and were false negative in zebrafish embryo assays. These methods included a fixed alizarin red-alcian blue staining, a calcein staining, and a live alizarin red staining. The results showed a high variability in staining intensity of larvae exposed to mammalian skeletal teratogens, as well as variability between control larvae originating from the same clutch of zebrafish. Hence, biological variability in (onset of) bone development in zebrafish hampers the detection of (subtle) treatment-related bone effects that are not picked-up by gross morphology. In conclusion, the used skeletal staining methods did not increase the sensitivity of zebrafish embryo developmental toxicity assays., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Steven Van Cruchten reports financial support was provided by University of Antwerp. Jonathan Ball reports financial support and equipment, drugs, or supplies were provided by University of Exeter. Steven Van Cruchten is Associate Editor for Reproductive Toxicology and Guest Editor for the Special Issue on NAMs for DART testing If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF