Search

Plain Language Summary Reproductive coercion (RC) is a type of abuse where a partner asserts control over a woman’s reproductive health trajectories. While RC was conceptualized in the United States, recent research highlights that it may be prominent in other geographies, including sub-Saharan Africa. Existing national surveillance programs, including the Demographic and Health Surveys, have included a single item on RC beginning in 2018. Given the phased approach to Demographic and Health Survey roll-out, no studies have examined this single item across diverse contexts. Further, this single item may miss the range of abusive experiences women face when seeking to manage their fertility. Using annual national cross-sections in 10 diverse contexts (eight countries), we sought to: (1) validate a comprehensive RC measure; (2) calculate prevalence of RC and specific behaviors; (3) understand risk factors for RC across contexts. We found that the comprehensive RC measure performed well across sites. Prevalence of past-year RC was highest in the Kongo Central region of the Democratic Republic of Congo (20.3%) and lowest in Niger (3.1%). Polygynous marriage was associated with increased risk of RC across six sites, whereas increased partner education levels were protective against RC in two sites. Understanding the prevalence of RC within a given context and range of specific abusive behaviors, as well as risk profiles, can help alert local service providers to women’s needs. A thorough understanding of commonalities and divergence of RC experiences and drivers across sites can help inform prevention and response programming to address RC and its health effects.

Plain Language summary Women use various words and phrases to describe their experiences managing their fertility and menstrual irregularities, and may interpret the experience of ending a possible pregnancy in nuanced ways, especially when their pregnancy status is ambiguous. Our study aims to understand the terminology women use to refer to abortion-like experiences (specifically menstrual regulation, which refers to actions taken to regulate a menstrual cycle, and pregnancy removal), and the specific scenarios that these practices encompass among women who reported having had an abortion in Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria. Our analysis draws upon data from surveys and qualitative interviews conducted in both countries. We find that the majority (71% in Nigeria and 70% in Côte d’Ivoire) of women perceive menstrual regulation to be a distinct concept from pregnancy removal, yet there is considerable variability in whether specific scenarios are interpreted as referring to menstrual regulation or pregnancy removal. Menstrual regulation is generally considered to be more ambiguous and not dependent on pregnancy confirmation in comparison to pregnancy removal, which is consistently interpreted as voluntary termination of pregnancy. These findings have relevance for researchers aiming to document abortion incidence and experiences, and practitioners seeking to address women’s reproductive health needs.