Search

The aim of this study was to determine if the outcomes of aneuploidy and translocation testing by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) at the 8-cell stage have a predictive value for new genetic diagnosis cycles. In total, 83 cycles (39 patients) undergoing PGD of translocations and 378 cycles (176 patients) of aneuploidy were included. Predictability, defined as having similar rate (±20%) of euploid embryos in the first and successive cycles, was found in 66% of patients undergoing aneuploidy testing. Predictability was found significantly more often in patients undergoing PGD of translocations (90%, P = 0.006). In addition, patients with 0. < 30 or ≥30% euploid embryos in the first cycle were compared and groups 0 and < 30% had significantly fewer euploid embryos in the second cycle (22-26%) than those of the group with ≥30% (37%) (P < 0.05). Patients who did not become pregnant after the first attempt were stimulated more aggressively than those becoming pregnant. producing significantly more embryos in the second than in the first cycle (P < O.001). Therefore, correlation between euploidy rate and pregnancy rate could not be assessed objectively between cycles. In conclusion, the PGD results of a first cycle can predict the results of the second cycle, but this is likely to be of more value when the condition investigated is translocation rather than aneuploidy. The chance of pregnancy is usually related to the number of euploid embryos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for male factor infertility were randomly assigned to receive ovarian stimulation in a long agonist protocol with a combination of recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH; Gonal-F® and recombinant human LH (r-hLH; Luveris&reg) (n = 212) starting on day 6 of FSH stimulation until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) at a daily fixed dose of 150 IU r-hLH, or with r-hFSH alone (n = 219). There was no significant difference in the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved (10.3 versus 10.4) in patients treated with r-hFSH and r-hLH versus r-hFSH alone; however, more embryos were transferred in the LH-supplemented group (2.9 versus 2.8, P = 0.037). Overall, the implantation rates were 22.9 versus 27.0% in patients treated with r-hFSH and r-hLH versus with r-hFSH alone respectively (NS). The respective numbers of MII oocytes retrieved in patients <35 or ≥35 years were 11 versus 8.3 (P = 0.010) for patients treated with r-hFSH alone, and 10.7 versus 9.3 (NS) for those given supplemental r-hLH (150 IU) from day 6. Implantation rates in patients <35 years treated with r-hFSH were higher (30.7%) than those receiving r-hFSH and r-hLH, (23.5%) (P = 0.068). In patients ≥35 years, the implantation rates were 21.7% for those patients supplemented with 150 IU r-hLH from day 6 of stimulation versus 15.7% when treated with FSH alone (NS). Younger patients therefore do not seem to benefit from an LH-supplemented ovarian stimulation protocol, but women ≥35 years undergoing assisted reproduction may benefit from using r-hLH in addition to r-hFSH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]