Search

Research Question: Are oxytocin preprotein and the oxytocin receptor expressed in human spermatozoa and is their mRNA expression different between normal semen samples and samples with at least one abnormal parameter?, Design: An in-vitro prospective study of 175 semen samples from Greek men, according to World Health Organization criteria, 2010. mRNA expression levels were compared between different categories of semen samples, classified according to their concentration, total number, motility and morphology. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect oxytocin preprotein and its receptor on spermatozoa smears., Results: Compared with normal samples (normal motility and normal concentration), samples with at least one abnormal sperm parameter had statistically significantly lower oxytocin preprotein mRNA expression (P = 0.019) and higher oxytocin receptor mRNA expression levels (P < 0.001). Oligozoospermic samples had statistically significantly higher oxytocin preprotein mRNA expression levels (P = 0.002) and lower oxytocin receptor mRNA expression levels (P = 0.047). Asthenozoospermic samples had statistically significantly lower oxytocin preprotein mRNA expression levels (P < 0.001). Teratozoospermic samples had statistically significantly lower oxytocin preprotein mRNA expression levels (P = 0.049) and higher oxytocin receptor mRNA expression levels (P < 0.001). Oxytocin preprotein mRNA expression was positively associated with total progressive motility (P < 0.001) and negatively associated with the percentage of immotile spermatozoa (P = 0.001). Oxytocin receptor mRNA expression was negatively associated with the percentage of normal forms (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Oxytocin preprotein and oxytocin receptor mRNA expression in spermatozoa could be used as a novel and unbiased diagnostic tool for male infertility., (Copyright © 2022 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Research Question: Are there any differences in viability, spindle abnormalities and mitochondrial and other organelle structures amongst embryos biopsied on day 3 versus day 5 before and after vitrification?, Design: A total of 240 day 3 biopsied embryos that developed to blastocysts but were rejected for transfer following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects (PGT-M) (n = 115) or for aneuploidies (PGT-A) (n = 125) were divided into two groups: (i) 120 blastocysts treated for viability, spindle/chromosome configuration (SCC) analysis and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis (fresh n = 20, n = 20, n = 20 and following vitrification/warming n = 20, n = 20, n = 20); (ii) 120 embryos were re-biopsied at the blastocyst stage and treated for viability, SCC and TEM analysis (fresh n = 20, n = 20, n = 20 and following vitrification/warming n = 20, n = 20, n = 20). Also, 60 vitrified blastocysts biopsied only on day 5 that were rejected for transfer following PGT-M (n = 6) or PGT-A (n = 54) were treated following warming for viability (n = 20), SCC (n = 20) and TEM analysis (n = 20)., Results: No differences were observed in SCC and ultrastructure between embryos biopsied on day 5 and day 3 but following vitrification higher numbers of abnormal spindles, distension of mitochondria, multivesicular bodies, lipofuscin droplets, altered cell junctions and occasionally excessive accumulation of glycogen granules were evident. The fresh day 3 biopsied group also had a lower incidence of damaged (propidium iodide-stained) cells compared with the fresh day 3+5 (P = 0.02) and the vitrified day 5 (P = 0.001) biopsied groups., Conclusions: Biopsies on day 5 and day 3 do not adversely affect embryo viability, SCC or ultrastructure, although following vitrification minimal embryo quality-dependent increases in spindle abnormalities and cell damage are observed., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Research Question: Are there any differences in viability and ultrastructure amongst embryos biopsied on Day 5 versus Day 3 following vitrification in open and closed systems and compared to fresh embryos?, Design: One hundred human embryos (40 blastocysts biopsied on Day 5 and subsequently vitrified in open or closed systems and 60 Day 3 biopsied embryos that developed to blastocysts but were rejected for transfer following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects and for aneuploidies were either treated fresh [n = 20] or vitrified [n = 40] in open or closed systems) and following warming and culture for 4 h were subjected to viability staining with carboxyfluorescein-diacetate succinimidylester/propidium iodide or processed for transmission electron microscopy., Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the viability of human biopsied embryos following vitrification in open and closed systems. Compared to fresh embryos, vitrified ones had a higher incidence of damage (propidium iodide-stained cells) irrespective of the vitrification method (P = 0.005). These damaged cells were more prominent in Day 5 biopsied blastocysts and mainly located at the position of cutting. Characteristic lipofuscin droplets (representative of apoptosis) and a higher number of vacuoles and distension of mitochondria were also more evident in vitrified embryos, although this was not statistically assessed., Conclusions: Vitrification in open and closed systems does not adversely affect the viability and ultrastructure of Day 5 and Day 3 biopsied embryos as revealed by the minimal yet statistically significant cell damage observed. This damage may be compensated by the embryos, which in their attempt to fully recover following vitrification, potentially enable 'rescue' processes to eliminate it., (Copyright © 2021 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Research Question: Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), androgen receptor (AR), LH beta polypeptide (LHB), progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) and progesterone receptor membrane component 2 (PGRMC2) regulate follicle development and maturation. Their mRNA expression was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of normal and poor responders, during ovarian stimulation., Design: Fifty-two normal responders and 15 poor responders according to the Bologna criteria were enrolled for IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection and stimulated with 200 IU of follitrophin alpha and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist. HCG was administered for final oocyte maturation. On days 1, 6 and 10 of stimulation, blood samples were obtained, serum hormone levels were measured, RNA was extracted from PBMC and real-time polymerase chain reaction was carried out to identify the mRNA levels. Relative mRNA expression of each gene was calculated by the comparative 2 -DDCt method., Results: Differences between mRNA levels of each gene on the same time point between the two groups were not significant. PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 mRNA levels were downregulated, adjusted for ovarian response and age. Positive correlations between PGRMC1 and AR (standardized beta = 0.890, P < 0.001) from day 1 to 6 and PGRMC1 and LHB (standardized beta = 0.806, P < 0.001) from day 1 to 10 were found in poor responders. PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 were positively correlated on days 6 and 10 in normal responders., Conclusions: PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 mRNA are significantly decreased during ovarian stimulation, with some potential differences between normal and poor responders., (Copyright © 2020 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The use of testicular spermatozoa in men without azoospermia has been proposed as a means to increase the chances of pregnancy following assisted reproductive treatment. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess whether clinical outcomes are better when testicular rather than ejaculated spermatozoa are used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with abnormal semen parameters without azoospermia. A literature search identified four eligible studies out of 757 initially found. In a prospective study in men with high DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and oligozoospermia, the probability of live birth was significantly higher with testicular compared to ejaculated spermatozoa (risk ratio [RR]: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-2.70). This was not the case in a retrospective study in men with high DFI only (RR: 2.36, 95% CI: 0.98-5.68). Clinical pregnancy rates were similar in a randomized controlled trial in men with asthenozoospermia with or without teratozoospermia (RR: 2.85, 95% CI: 0.76-10.69) and in a retrospective study in men with isolated asthenozoospermia (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.56-2.14). Currently, there is limited, low-quality evidence suggesting that a higher probability of pregnancy might be expected using testicular rather than ejaculated spermatozoa, only in men with high DFI and oligozoospermia., (Copyright © 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prolongation of the time interval between HCG administration and oocyte retrieval, from 36 h to 38 h, affects oocyte retrieval rate in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins and GnRH antagonists for IVF. One hundred and fifty-six normo-ovulatory women were randomized to have oocyte retrieval performed 36 h (n = 78) or 38 h (n = 78) following HCG administration. Oocyte retrieval rate was defined as number of cumulus-oocyte-complex (COC) retrieved/follicle ≥ 11 mm present on day of HCG administration. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding baseline characteristics. Moreover, no significant difference was observed between the groups regarding oocyte retrieval rate (difference: + 1.2%, 95% CI for difference between medians: -4.5 to +12.1). The median (95% CI for the median) was not significantly different between the groups regarding number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs) retrieved: 5.5 (5.0-7.0) versus 6.0 (5.0-6.2), respectively, and fertilization rates: 57.7% (50.0-66.7) versus 50.0% (44.8-65.5), respectively. Live birth rates were similar between the groups (20.5% versus 16.7%, RD: + 3.8%, 95% CI: -8.5 to +16.1, respectively). Prolongation of time interval between HCG administration and oocyte retrieval from 36 h to 38 h does not affect oocyte retrieval rate., (Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In humans and most mammals, with the exception of some rodents notably the mouse, the centrosome, which is the organizing centre of the spindle, is uniparentally (paternally) inherited. The sperm centrosome is transmitted to the egg at fertilization, forming an aster comprising radially arrayed microtubules that brings the male and female pronuclei into close apposition and organizes the first mitotic spindle in the zygote. Each centrosome contains a pair of centrioles that are oriented perpendicular to one another, surrounded by dense fibrillar pericentriolar material, within which functional and regulatory molecules are embedded. The centrosome is a complex organelle with a crucial role to play in human fertility and the ability of human embryos to undergo normal development. Centrosomal defects can lead to failure in fertilization, and cause embryonic arrest through the formation of abnormal spindles and the accumulation of chromosomally abnormal cells that derive from them. This paper is a brief review of the role of the centrosome and the implications of its dysfunction in early embryogenesis, with particular reference to the human embryo.

Polymorphisms of the size of heterochromatic centromeric regions of chromosomes have been well documented in the human. They appear to have no phenotypic effects in the carriers. However, they appear to be over-represented in infertile couples and those with repeated miscarriages, and there is now growing evidence that they are involved in meiotic pairing, spindle fibre attachment and chromosome movement. Here an analysis of inheritance is reported for a couple presenting with repeated IVF failure in which several embryos were identified as carriers of a polymorphism of the centromeric region of chromosome 16 (16qh-) following aneuploidy screening by sequential fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), using probes for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y. Detailed cytogenetic analysis by high-resolution banding and FISH of both parents and grandparents established that the polymorphism was familial and inherited from the maternal grandfather. Furthermore, complete analysis of all embryonic nuclei from carrier embryos and others rejected for transfer because of aneuploidy revealed no abnormalities in the segregation pattern of chromosome 16.

Use of a non-contact infrared laser (IRL) or acid Tyrode's for zona drilling before embryo biopsy was compared by assessing blastomere viability using various fluorescent markers or culture of the single biopsied blastomere, and, by cytoskeletal and molecular cytogenetic analysis of the biopsied embryos following culture to the blastocyst stage. There was no significant difference in the proportion of biopsied embryos that showed no damage in both the biopsied blastomere and in the remaining embryo (acid Tyrode's: 75% versus IRL: 68%), or in the proportion of single biopsied blastomeres that divided in culture (P > 0.05). However, single biopsied blastomeres from laser drilled embryos showed a greater tendency to form miniblastocysts. The proportion of laser or acid Tyrode's biopsied embryos that reached the blastocyst stage by day 6 was similar, although evident earlier (day 5) in the laser biopsied embryos. Spindle abnormalities at the blastocyst stage included tripolar and tetrapolar spindles, but their incidence was not significantly different from controls. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities and mosaicism between the two groups. It is concluded that using an IRL at a safe working distance does not cause adverse immediate or longer term effects on the development of human biopsied embryos, although damage can occur if drilling within this distance is unavoidable. Acid Tyrode's drilling can also cause damage, and tended to retard blastocyst development.

To compare the effects of using a non-contact infrared laser with acid Tyrode's for zona drilling, mouse embryos were used to examine both immediate effects on blastomere viability, using fluorescent markers, and development to the blastocyst stage in vitro. Preliminary experiments with isolated blastomeres established that the safe working distance for the lowest setting of the laser (pulse duration 5 ms) was 8 micro m. At the 2-cell stage, when it was possible to drill through the zona while maintaining this safe distance from adjacent blastomeres, no immediate damage was detected. At the 8-cell stage, blastomeres are generally <8 micro m away from the outer surface of the zona and often touch its inner surface. Hence it was not possible to drill the zona while maintaining a safe distance and as a consequence almost all embryos had at least one, and often more, damaged blastomeres. Acid Tyrode's drilling also frequently lysed an adjacent blastomere at this stage and after 24 h in culture cavitation was delayed compared with laser-drilled embryos. Cell numbers at the late morula/early blastocyst stage, analysed by differential labelling of trophectoderm and inner cell mass nuclei, were significantly reduced following zona drilling. With the laser-drilled embryos, this was in proportion to the immediate effects on blastomere viability, whereas with acid Tyrode's, the reduction was greater, indicating an adverse effect on cleavage rate. It is concluded that use of a non-contact laser, at an appropriate pulse duration and distance from adjacent blastomeres, avoids blastomere lysis and adverse effects on development caused by acid Tyrode's zona-drilling.