Search

An experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of different doses of eCG on ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers treated with a Ovsynch plus progesterone protocol. Twenty-five cyclic yearling Black Angus heifers (373.0 ± 35.7 kg), in 2 replicates, received an injection of 100 μg of GnRH (Ovurelin, Bomac Laboratories Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) i.m. and an intravaginal progesterone device (1.38 g of progesterone; Eazi-Breed CIDR, Pfizer Animal Health, New Zealand) on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment), followed by 500 μg of cloprostenol (PGF, Estrumate, Intervet/Schering-Plough Animal Health, Auckland, New Zealand) i.m. on Day 7, and a second 100 μg of GnRH injection given i.m. on Day 9 (56 h after PGF). At the time of PGF treatment, heifers were randomly assigned to 5 treatment groups to receive 0, 300, 500, 700, or 1000 IU of eCG (Folligon, Intervet/Schering-Plough Animal Health) i.m. Heifers were monitored by ultrasonography (Aloka 900-SSD equipped with a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer; Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) daily from Day 0 to 9 (GnRH), and then every 12 h until ovulation. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskall-Wallis test, and means or ranks were compared with LSD or Wilcoxon rank sum tests, respectively. Because a replicate effect was observed (P< 0.05) in the size of the dominant follicle at the second GnRH and prior to ovulation, replicate effect was included in the analysis. The luteal area at PGF treatment was significantly greater (P< 0.01) in heifers that ovulated (750.0 ± 97 mm2) in response to the first GnRH treatment than in those that did not (301.6 ± 42.7 mm2). The diameter of the dominant follicle at the time of PGF treatment was also greater (P< 0.05) in ovulating (11.2 ± 0.4 mm) than in nonovulating (9.7 ± 0.5 mm) heifers. The interval from the first GnRH treatment to the emergence of the next follicular wave was longer (P= 0.50) and more variable in heifers that did not ovulate (2.9 ± 0.4 d; n= 27) than in those that ovulated (1.9 ± 0.2 d; n= 23). There was no effect (P< 0.37) of eCG on the interval from PGF to ovulation (86 ± 1.9 h). The number of ovulations after the second GnRH was higher (P= 0.01) in the group of heifers treated with 1000 IU of eCG (1.8 ± 0.4) than in the other groups (1.0 ± 0.0; 1.1 ± 0.1; 1.2 ± 0.1; 1.0 ± 0.1). There was an effect of day of follicular wave emergence on the number of ovulations (P< 0.01). Heifers with a wave emerging 1 to 3 days after the first GnRH (n= 37), had one ovulation (1.0 ± 0.0), whereas heifers with a wave emerging on Day 4 (3 out of 4 heifers) and Days 5 to 7 (n= 9), ovulated 2 or more follicles. In summary, the multiple ovulation effect occurred when eCG was given to heifers with a follicular wave emerging on or after Day 4, and was potentiated when heifers received 1000 IU of eCG. Although the dose of eCG given at the time of PGF treatment in an Ovsynch program has a significant effect on follicular development, the time of emergence of the dominant follicle appeared to be more important in the ovulation of preovulatory follicle/s after the eCG and the second GnRH treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A study was designed to compare the effect of a prostaglandin-based synchronization protocol on ovarian follicular dynamics in sheep with the FecB (Booroola) mutation. Forty dry Romney sheep (57.6 ± 7.3 kg; 6.1 ± 1.1 years) were randomly selected from both Invermay Booroola (BB; n= 20) and commercial (non-FecB carriers, ++; n= 20) flocks. All ewes had their estrous cycles synchronized with 2 i.m. injections of PGF (150 μg of cloprostenol, Estrumate, Schering-Plough Coopers Animal Health Ltd., New Zealand) administered 7 days apart. Ewes were monitored by transrectal ultrasonography (Aloka 900-SSD and a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) daily from Day -2 to the day of ovulation. Data were analyzed by Student''s t-test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Variances were compared with Barlett''s test. Paired t-test compared the number of preovulatory follicles in each genotype after PGF treatments and intervals from PGF to ovulation after PGF. Data are presented as mean (± SEM). The number of corpora lutea (CL) and total CL area at the time of the first and second PGF treatment were 4.4 ± 0.6; 5.7 ± 1.4 and 672.1 ± 133.5 mm2; 999.0 ± 145.9 mm2in the BB and 2.1 ± 0.2; 2.1 ± 0.5 and 342.3 ± 60.7 mm2; 401.3 ± 68.6 mm2in ++ ewes, respectively. These 2 variables were higher (P 0.61) between BB (3.4 ± 0.2; 3.0 ± 0.3d) and ++ (3.5 ± 0.2d; 3.0 ± 0.1d) ewes. However, interval from the second PGF to ovulation was more variable (P= 0.002) in the BB than in the ++ ewes. Data of both groups were combined and a mean significant difference of 0.6 ± 0.2d (P< 0.003) was found between the first and second PGF-to-ovulation intervals. The interval from the first PGF to emergence of the next follicular wave was shorter (P< 0.02) and more variable (P< 0.03) in the BB (2.7 ± 0.4d) than in the ++ (3.5 ± 0.2 d) group. Preovulatory follicles were smaller in Booroola, but higher in number, than in ++ ewes, whereas the luteal area was similar. Within the BB ewes, the higher number of follicles that ovulated after the second PGF than after the first injection may be due to a higher follicular response to an elevated rebound in circulating FSH after the first PGF. A high number of growing follicles of the first follicular wave may also have contributed to this event. These findings warrant further research aimed at the study of the interaction between FSH and follicle dynamics in estrus synchronized sheep carrying the FecB mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]