Heavy thinning is supposed to be helpful for maintaining more favorable water balance in forest stands, and thus mitigate impact of drought episodes. To investigate impact of thinning on topsoil (10–13 cm) moisture conditions, a two-year soil sampling campaigns were conducted in 2019 and 2020. The soil moisture was calculated using a water-weight loss approach based on dry/fresh sample weight ratio. The samples were collected using metal capsules of known weight from totally 8–9 experimental series monthly during growing seasons of 2019 and 2020, respectively. Each series included thinned and un-thinned young growth stands of Norway spruce monoculture, spruce mixed with broadleaved tree species and mixture of sycamore maple with rowan. However, the statistically significant differences were not found in topsoil moisture between thinned and un-thinned young growth stands, thinned ones showed slightly better water balance conditions during both investigated years. Reduced number of trees and canopy closure had not depleted water throughout evaporation from upper soil profile. Therefore, thinning of young growth should be recommended especially at drought-endangered sites. Forest health decline and following die-off are exhibited in large areas of monospecific stands of Norway spruce and Scots pine in the Czech Republic. This development is attributable to shifts of conditions such as high air temperatures in growing seasons and different distribution of precipitation amounts over year, which resulted in hydrological drought in 2015–2019. Thinning is a deliberate measure that helps us control future stability, health and resilience of young forest stands and also impacts on species composition, environment and nutrient cycle in the stands. Heavy thinning is supposed to affect hydrological balance as interception is reduced (lower LAI) and more soil water is expected to be available for the trees left on site. On the other hand, such thinning intensity can increase evaporation from inside the stands and it also increases temperature amplitudes. The drought stress is even attributable to increased transpiration rates from released trees in case the soil below canopy has been dry for a long time. If true frequently, one can doubt a usefulness of heavy thinning at drought-endangered forest sites. This article deals with topsoil moisture below thinned thickets of tree species that were compared with moisture conditions below unthinned thickets. The objective of the study addressed a research question whether the thinning affected availability of water in soil, and thus proved a beneficial effect of the heavier thinning on the young drought-endangered forest stands. The sampled stands were monospecific spruce, spruce mixed with other, mainly broadleaved tree species and sycamore maple with rowan (Table 2). The thinning aimed at releasing crop trees of better quality and removal of both the unhealthy ones and wolf broadleaves; the thinned treatment was always accompanied with the unthinned one. 10–13 cm mineral topsoil samples (20 per thinned-unthinned series i.e. 10 per the treatment, see Table 3) were taken monthly in May-September periods in 2019–2020. Larger stones were excluded from the samples, and each sample was placed into metal capsules (of known weight) and covered with lid. The closed capsules were then delivered to laboratory where a water weight loss was measured as ratio of dry (dried at 105 °C) and fresh sample weights; this allowed us to determine a soil sample moisture. Arithmetic means were calculated from 10 values representing thinned and unthinned moisture conditions. The differences were tested using a pair t-test and 95% confidence intervals of difference were computed using R 3.6.3 (R Core Team 2020). In 2019, topsoil moisture was affected negatively by low precipitation at depth of 10–13 cm; minimum values were shown in July. Following 2020 showed more favorable conditions with maximal values in May and July. Soil moisture showed also higher variability in 2020 compared to 2019 (Fig. 1). The differences between control and thinned treatments were very small and even negligible. In 2019, the sites benefited from thinning slightly except for May values when 0.4% higher soil moisture was found below unthinned canopy. No statistically significant (α = 0.05) differences excepting for the thinned treatment in September (1.5% higher moisture, p = 0.02) were found in 2019. The topsoil moisture was 0.6% higher insignificantly (p = 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.6 ± 1.1 %) under thinned treatments in 2019. Next year, the soil moisture values exhibited small differences reflecting also benefit from thinning; the only zero difference was shown in August. The highest moisture attributable to removal of trees amounted 1.8% higher moisture compared to control in July. No statistically significant (α = 0.05) differences were found significant though July values were at limit of significance (p = 0.05). The topsoil moisture was 0.9% higher insignificantly again (p = 0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.9 ± 1.3 %) under thinned treatments in 2020. Based on the two-year measurement campaign and data analysis it can be concluded: • More favorable precipitation conditions of 2020 affected 10–13 topsoil moisture values positively compared to precipitation-poorer 2019. • The topsoil moisture below thinned thickets showed slightly higher values compared to conditions without thinning; the differences were found insignificant mostly. • Removal of trees and following broken canopies, however, did not show depleted topsoil water due to higher evaporation from exposed forest floor surface. The early thinning of the thickets should not, therefore be ignored at drought-endangered sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]