Search

Deep coaxial borehole heat exchangers (CBHEs) are being widely used in clean space heating of buildings in winter. Here we report a new field test on a 1800m deep CBHE in the southern Daxing uplift, Beijing, a representative geological region in North China. Under the economic flow rate of 20–25 m3/h, the steady heat extraction power is 237.24–256.54 kW. Further, numerical modelling and simulation calculations are performed to compare the applicability of the Eskilson-Claesson model and Al-Khoury model for different operation patterns and then analyze the operation performance of deep CBHE during the whole heating season. For typical flow rates, compared with the continuous pattern, the intermittent pattern can increase the heat extraction power per unit depth by 25.4–31.0% and reduce the thermal influence radius by 1.46–1.89 m due to a better ground temperature recovery around the borehole. In addition, a new contribution factor (CF) is introduced to evaluate the temperature contribution of different ground layers during the heat extraction, which can reveal the influences of flow conditions, geothermal gradient, thermal properties, and even groundwater flow. The present results support that deep CBHEs have more obvious advantages for space heating of buildings with intermittent heating requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ground thermal properties are the basic parameters for the design of borehole heat exchanger (BHE) in ground–coupled heat pump system (GCHPs), and their accuracy directly affects the economy and reliability of the heat pump system. In traditional design, ground is usually regarded as an isotropic homogeneous medium, and its thermal properties are obtained by solving the inverse heat transfer problem in BHE through in-situ thermal response test (TRT). In fact, different geological layers can be observed along the depth of BHE, and thermal physical properties of each layer are different based on the ground geological conditions. In order to investigate the effect of geological stratification on estimated accuracy of ground thermal parameters in TRT, a validated numerical layered BHE model (NLBM) is presented to simulated TRT, and the fluid temperature response is used to estimate effective ground thermal conductivity and borehole thermal resistance based on line source model (LSM). Secondly, the distributions of fluid temperature in U-pipe and heat flux of BHE along the depth are compared and analyzed based on the NLBM and the numerical homogeneous BHE model (NHBM). At last, borehole thermal resistance from the NLBM and estimated borehole thermal resistance from LSM are compared. The results show the maximum heat flux in the 3rd layer of the NLBM is 21.1% higher than that of NHBM, and the minimum heat flux in the 1st layer is reduced by 46.9% in the 100 h duration. The estimated λ LSM using the fluid temperature responses in the NLBM is 1.3% higher than the thickness-weighted thermal conductivity in the NLBM. The minimum relative error between R LSM and R b is still up to 10.45% in the duration of 100 h even though extending the duration is helpful to improve the estimated accuracy of R LSM. • A numerical layered BHE model is proposed and validated by the experiment. • The distributions of fluid temperatures are compared from the two models. • The differences of heat flux are illustrated in the two models. • Effect of geological stratification on estimated accuracy is investigated in TRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

U-bend deep borehole heat exchanger (DBHE) is a new promising kind of ground heat exchanger, but nowadays there are lack of accurate efficient models to simulate U-bend DBHE. This paper has developed a semi-analytical model of U-bend DBHE, which considers the unsteady heat transfer of borehole, heterogenous soil thermal properties and geothermal gradient. A 2D numerical model and an analytical model based on infinite line-source theory are also developed, and the three models are compared with experimental data for different boundary conditions. Based on the soil thermal properties estimated by logging data and rock identification, the three models have large errors when compared with experimental data. Based on a soil thermal conductivity λ s estimated by matching experimental data, the three models match better with experimental data, and it is inferred that λ s should be measured by thermal response test instead of rock identification. The semi-analytical model and 2D numerical model match very well for all the time, but the analytical model has large differences with 2D numerical model, which is because the analytical model ignores borehole heat capacity and time-varying heat flows at the borehole wall. This paper could provide a cost-effective semi-analytical model and some advices for U-bend DBHE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

U-bend deep borehole heat exchanger (DBHE) is a new promising kind of ground heat exchanger, but nowadays there are lack of accurate efficient models to simulate U-bend DBHE. This paper has developed a semi-analytical model of U-bend DBHE, which considers the unsteady heat transfer of borehole, heterogenous soil thermal properties and geothermal gradient. A 2D numerical model and an analytical model based on infinite line-source theory are also developed, and the three models are compared with experimental data for different boundary conditions. Based on the soil thermal properties estimated by logging data and rock identification, the three models have large errors when compared with experimental data. Based on a soil thermal conductivity λ s estimated by matching experimental data, the three models match better with experimental data, and it is inferred that λ s should be measured by thermal response test instead of rock identification. The semi-analytical model and 2D numerical model match very well for all the time, but the analytical model has large differences with 2D numerical model, which is because the analytical model ignores borehole heat capacity and time-varying heat flows at the borehole wall. This paper could provide a cost-effective semi-analytical model and some advices for U-bend DBHE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]