1. Does intensity-based weighting of multiple-return terrestrial LiDAR data improve leaf area density estimates?
- Author
-
Kent, Eric R. and Bailey, Brian N.
- Subjects
- *
LEAF area , *LIDAR , *BEER-Lambert law , *STATISTICAL weighting , *PLANT canopies , *LASER pulses , *ESTIMATES - Abstract
Terrestrial LiDAR scanning (TLS) data can be used to efficiently estimate plant canopy structural variables including leaf area density (LAD). This is done by estimating the transmission probability of LiDAR beams through a canopy, which is directly related to the local LAD. Advancements in TLS technology have enabled instruments that can record multiple object intersection points along a single laser pulse path, but whether this additional information can improve LAD estimation from TLS is not fully understood. Several methods for incorporating multiple returns per beam into transmission probability and LAD estimations have been previously suggested, including the use of corrected relative intensity to weight multiple returns more precisely. Intensity-based weighting is complicated by unknown variation in surface reflectance and orientation. Synthetic multiple-return TLS simulations were performed for virtual homogeneous voxels and heterogeneous tree cases with known properties (LAD, leaf angle distribution, reflectivity) in order to evaluate LAD estimates using intensity-based weighting in comparison to first-hits and equal-weighting approaches. An idealized intensity-based weighting, where the fraction of beam energy hitting every surface is known, and an exact weighting, where the impact of partial misses is also accounted for were also analyzed. Intensity-based weighting of multiple-return TLS data did not necessarily improve transmission probability and LAD estimates compared with the more simple equal-weighting method. Both methods had relatively similar performance, with the intensity-weighting method tending towards slightly lower transmission and higher LAD. There could be significant errors for all methods, including when weighting of hit points was exact. The error in LAD caused by choice of weighting method was therefore sometimes overshadowed by a combination of other errors due to clumping, partial misses, voxel occlusion, and limitations of Beer's law for dense canopies, which could have substantial impacts. Given the small, but inconsistent potential improvements in accuracy of the intensity-based methods that were tested in this work, the equal-weighting method appears an acceptable choice. • Methods for weighting multiple-return terrestrial LiDAR data were tested. • Methods were evaluated with LiDAR simulations and known canopy geometry. • Weighting multiple returns equally or by intensity produced similar LAD estimates. • Partial misses and clumping may have a greater impact than return-weighting method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF