Search

We try to assess the validity of assumptions taken when deriving drift velocity. We give simple formulas for characteristics of the spatiotemporal correlation function of the observed diffraction pattern for the frozen flow and the more general Briggs model. Using Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR) Cassiopeia intensity observation, we compare the experimental velocity scaling factor with a theoretical one to show that both models do not follow observations. We also give a qualitative comparison of our drift velocity estimates with SuperDARN convection maps. The article is essentially an extended version of the conference paper: “Determining ionospheric drift and anisotropy of irregularities from LOFAR core measurements”, Signal Processing Symposium 2021 (SPSympo 2021).

The Earth’s ionosphere is a highly variable medium on a wide range of spatio-temporal scales. The responsiveness of plasma to the geomagnetic field and its changes gives rise to anisotropy, which may introduce wave-like characteristics while scanning the ionosphere with a line-of-sight towards a radio source. Previous studies of LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) calibration phase solutions report that the estimated beta parameter of a structure function calculated over 6–8 h of astronomical observation timespan has a range of values from 1.6 to 2.0, with an average of 1.89. Such difference between the observations could result from transient wave-like disturbances within the data. This study aims to present a method of signal processing of ionospheric calibration datasets that allows the extraction of a transient wave-like signal and discuss its possible origin. We use complex Morlet wavelet analysis applied to two 8 h observations corresponding to very quiet geomagnetic conditions. We find a wave-like signal in the interferometric Total Electron Content data even during periods of no geomagnetic activity. We suggest it results from the relative velocity changes between the LOFAR line-of-sight and a convection pattern in the ionospheric F layer. Establishing the relationship between quiet time ionosphere, geomagnetic field changes and LOFAR’s calibration solutions may prove beneficial to determination of the dominant signals in the more disturbed conditions, which we leave for future study.