The necessity to offer special therapeutic programmes focusing on job related problems in psychosomatic rehabilitation has become increasingly evident. Which patients should participate in such programmes? This question has not yet been discussed with regard to its theoretical and methodological implications. In clinical practice the decision has been based on the therapists evaluation. 105 patients, consecutively admitted in a psychosomatic hospital were interviewed with a screening questionnaire about their job related strains and the perceived interaction between symptomatology and job. According to the literature guidelines for inclusion of psychosomatic patients to a special work hardening programme were used. Therapists were asked to independently assign their patients to the programme. The overlap between the two procedures was small. While the guidelines focussed on a high level of job strain and the patient's motivation for a job-related therapeutic approach, the therapists' decision was based on duration of inability to work, impairments at work due to the symptoms, conflicts with colleagues at work and the patient's ability to perceive problems in a differentiated manner. Considering the problem of inclusion-criteria for a work hardening programme, the highly complex constellations behind routine therapeutic decisions in psychosomatic rehabilitation became evident. To integrate medical diagnosis, symptomatology, psychological models, job strain, the patient's social situation and values, is a neglected but important goal of rehabilitation sciences and should be a base for a concept guiding the development, evaluation and establishment of work related therapeutic programmes.