Search

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) play an important role in the rehabilitation of people with major limb amputations. Patient-completed questionnaires help collect specific constructs on this patient population. The COMPASS and LEAD initiatives, carried out by the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO), underscore the importance of regularly collecting high-quality PROMs. These are essential for the evaluation of rehabilitation needs, progress, and success. In the final report of ISPO's major international initiative, PROMs recommendations of the expert panel are tabulated. In Table 3.2 of the report, ISPO lists n=12 PROMs that were included in the narrow consensus process were considered to be of acceptable quality, and therefore recommended. The aim of this systematic review was to specifically search for these recommended PROMS regarding their availability in a German and validated version in order to identify potential gaps. All PROMs that were available in a German and validated version were then examined further with regard to the quality of the validation study, using the checklist of COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Through a systematic literature search, six validated German-language versions were found. Only four of these met the quality standards of the COSMIN checklist sufficiently. Overall, this review shows serious gaps in the availability in the German language of validated versions of PROMs used internationally and recommended as standard by the ISPO. This gap needs to be closed by guideline-oriented translation and subsequent validation studies in order to be able to offer and collect the PROMS recommended by the ISPO also for German-speaking patient populations., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Die Autor*innen geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Competing Interests: Die Autor*innen geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Purpose: The aim of this prospective validation study was to translate the Prosthesis Mobility Questionnaire 2.0 (PMQ) into German based on a guideline, following by psychometric testing for its validity and reliability using classical test theory., Methods: The PMQ was translated into German according to ISPOR guidelines using double forward and double backward translations, finalized by pilot testing (N=10). Subsequently, assessment of the validity and reliability was performed from March 2020 to August 2020 on N=61 patients with unilateral lower limb amputation. Construct validity was determined by using the German version of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5-D), the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), the Timed up and go Test (TUG), and K-levels. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to check internal consistency and discriminatory power was determined by item correlations. Test-retest reliability was calculated using ICC (2,1). Based on the ICC, the minimum detectable difference (MDC) was calculated., Results: The translation process required small changes after the pilot test. The validation study was performed on N=61 patients (56.59±13.16 years, m/f=38/23). A mean PMQ of 26.23±8.89 points was achieved. Ceilings or floor effects for total score did not appear. Construct validity showed strong positive correlations to LCI-5-D (r=0.74, p<0.001), RMI (r=0.63 p<0.001) as well as k-levels (r=0.61 p<0.001) and moderate negative correlation to TUG (r=- 0.49, p<0.001). Internal consistency was excellent with Cronbach's alpha=0.95). All items showed a value greater than r=0.40 for item-to-total score correlation. Test-retest reliability was excellent with an ICC (2,1)=0.98 with a timespan between T0 and T1 of 3.2±2.83 days. Based on this results, the MDC was 3.40 points., Conclusion: The German version of the Prosthesis Mobility Questionnaire 2.0 is a valid, reliable patient reported outcome measure (PROM) for measuring mobility and functional ability of patients with exoprosthesis due to unilateral lower limb amputation. It can be used for a German-speaking population., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Multiple organizations like UN and WHO call for the collection of internationally comparable data on living and supply conditions of people with disabilities. Furthermore, reliable national data are necessary for ensuring appropriate care. Regarding patients with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in Germany, only data on diagnostics or therapeutic interventions is currently available. The International Spinal Cord Injury Survey aims at collecting reliable data of people with SCI in 21 countries and developing recommendations for actions to be taken by policy-makers and other decision-makers., Methods: In 2017, eight specialized SCI-centers across Germany sent a standardized questionnaire to their patients who had diagnosis of SCI, and were older than 18 years (n=5,598). The questionnaire could be completed paper-based or online., Results: 1,479 patients participated in the study and were included in data analysis. On average, participants were 55.3 years (SD=14.6) old, ¾ were male. The mean time of onset of paralysis was 13.9 years. Two thirds of the spinal cord injury causes were traumatic. In 51.2% SCI was classified as paraplegia. The most frequently cited health problem was sexual dysfunction. Medical treatment for this problem was rarely used. Serious environmental barriers were the inadequate accessibility of private households and public places. 42.5% of the respondents in working age were employed, which is 10% less than in Switzerland., Discussion: Serious problems in environmental barriers, medical care and labor market participation were identified for people with SCI. The results will be reported to and discussed with political decision makers and further actors to create solutions. This requires extensive efforts, like modification in building law and home support., Competing Interests: Die finanzielle Förderung erfolgte durch die Manfred-Sauer-Stiftung. Der Stifter ist selbst querschnittgelähmt und Hersteller von Inkontinenzhilfsmitteln. Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: Identification of patient-related influencing factors on access to follow-up rehabilitation METHODS: Partially standardized, written survey of patients between the ages of 18 and 65 in 3 acute hospitals in Hanover, who were assigned to one of the following six defined indication groups on the basis of their diagnosis: (1) surgically treated bone fractures, (2) knee and hip endoprosthesis, (3) malignant disease from visceral surgery, (4) heart disease without surgical intervention, (5) heart disease with surgical intervention, and (6) stroke. In addition to personal information (such as age and gender) personal rehabilitation goals, rehabilitation motivation, disease processing, functioning, state of health, the knowledge of right to request and suffrage and the personal desire to start a follow-up rehabilitation were raised., Results: Of the 1,227 patients surveyed, 42.5% received follow-up rehabilitation. The percentages between the groups of diagnoses varied widely and were lowest after conservatively treated heart disease (3.2%) and highest after knee and hip joint replacement (98.1%). Including cases with a follow-up rehabilitation relevant diagnosis (n=1,000), the proportion of persons with rehabilitation increased to 51.7% (p<0.001). Reasons for an untreated follow-up rehabilitation were in rare cases the rejection by the payer (0.7%), the rejection by the patient (1.6%) or the lack of rehabilitation ability (3.3%). However in most cases the application remained without further differentiation (28.5%). The most important factor influencing follow-up rehabilitation access were diagnosis. Compared to knee- and hip endoprosthesis, the patients from other relevant diagnosis groups had a much lower chance to start a follow-up rehabilitation (OR from 0,01 up to 0,07; p<0,001). The desire of the patient showed the second most and significant influence to get follow-up rehabilitation (OR=8.18; p<0.001)., Conclusions: The diagnosis was identified as the most important criterion for follow-up rehabilitation access. No measurable factors of functioning seem to have a big influence. Therefore, the individual doctor's decision to submit an application is of particular importance. Especially because of the low level of medical knowledge on the indication catalog of the German pension insurance, the medical treatment based on professional experience as well as the lack of further education possibilities (Gottschling-Lang, 2016), it can be assumed that the follow-up rehabilitation is less standardized and systematic. In order to ensure a need-based patient care, assessment procedures should be established and the training and continuing education of physicians should be supplemented with the topic of follow-up rehabilitation., Competing Interests: Die Studie wurde finanziell gefördert durch die Deutsche Rentenversicherung Braunschweig-Hannover., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objective: The aim was to analyze individual and environmental factors influencing the access to follow-up rehabilitation of cardiological patients after surgery., Methods: An exploratory, cross-sectional study without intervention was conducted. A standardized questionnaire was used for data collection in two acute care clinics at cardiological and cardiosurgical wards. Multivariate logistic regression was used to measure the influence of different factors on the access to follow-up rehabilitation. In 61.0% of the patients a follow-up rehabilitation was granted., Results: 210 patients were included. The average age was 52.1 years, 81.0% were male. There were significant differences between the groups with and without follow-up rehabilitation concerning age (p=0.018), sex (p=0.007), the PAREMO-scales "Änderungsbereitschaft" (p=0.011) and "Skepsis" (p=0.005) and the aim of rehabilitation to learn skills in dealing with the disease (p=0.043). The Barthel-Index was not significant different between the two groups. The chance to get a follow-up rehabilitation was significantly increased by indications corresponding to the "AHB-Indikationskatalog" (p=0.001; OR=5.76) and after request of the patients to get a follow-up rehabilitation (p<0.001; OR=17.91)., Discussion: The access to follow-up rehabilitation was predominantly indication-specific and depended on patients' request of cardiological patients after surgery. A follow-up rehabilitation requires an adequate rehabilitation capacity (Barthel-Index). However the effect of the Barthel-Index on the access to follow-up rehabilitation was not significant., Conclusion: It is still in question, to what extent the personal patient's wish can be linked to parameters of rehabilitation capacity. Furthermore it is necessary to develop concepts which increase the influence of rehabilitation capacity on the decision of a follow-up rehabilitation., Competing Interests: Das Projekt wurde durch Fördermittel von der DRV Bund finanziell unterstützt., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)