Search

To protect human health, acute reference values have been established for pesticides which have the potential to cause a toxic effect after acute human exposure. These values are used to identify exposure levels below which there is no appreciable risk. Comprehensive reference documents, including OECD criteria, are available to aid identification of relevant toxicological endpoints. Within Europe, there is a concern that the identification process is inconsistent and unnecessarily conservative such that safe products with no established human health risk are being restricted. For this reason, the basis for the setting of an acute reference dose (ARfD) has been investigated for 130 pesticides to better understand how the toxicological endpoints are selected. The investigation has shown that most ARfDs are derived from repeat dose studies and that there is an over-representation of prenatal developmental toxicity studies. There is clear evidence that ARfDs derived from rabbit developmental toxicity studies are set over conservatively with regard to acute maternal effects and often inappropriately. To facilitate an improved system, refinements to the existing process are recommended, the use of maternal data in the rabbit as the basis for deriving an ARfD is critically evaluated and a new, more pragmatic approach to ARfD derivation is proposed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

To derive an acute TTC threshold, the correlation between Allowable Daily Intakes (ADIs, chronic values) and Acute Reference Doses (ARfDs) of pesticides evaluated in the EU was investigated and their distributions were compared. The correlation between ARfDs and ADIs was significant (p = 0.01), but weak (r(2) = 0.051). Consequently, using this approach to derive acute TTC values does not seem valid. Therefore, the distributions of ARfDs and ADIs were compared directly, in order to extrapolate from chronic to acute TTC values. This comparison made for the combined Cramer structural class II and III pesticides showed a ratio ARfD/ADI of approximately 3 at the fifth percentile of the distributions. Based on these results, it is justified to propose a TTC for acute effects for Cramer III substances by multiplying the Cramer class III TTC threshold of 90 μg/person/day with a factor 3. This leads to an acute TTC threshold based on the Munro dataset for Cramer class III substances of 270 μg/person/day., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hazard characterisation is largely based on an approach of (statistically) comparing dose groups with the controls in order to derive points of departure such as no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) or lowest-observed-adverse-effect levels (LOAELs). This approach suggests the absence of any relevant effect at the NOAEL. The NOAEL approach has been debated for decades. A recent Scientific Opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded that the Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach should be preferred over the NOAEL approach for deriving human (health-based) limit or guidance values. Nonetheless, the BMD approach is used infrequently within European regulatory frameworks. The reason for this may lie in legislation or guidelines requiring the use of the NOAEL approach. In this context, various EU regulatory frameworks were examined on such demands. Interestingly, no single legislation was identified containing statutory requirements in conflict with the use of the BMD approach., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)