Search

The peak of incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) overlaps with the peak of reproductive age. Moreover, women affected by IBD are often concerned with the possible negative effects of their disease and medications on pregnancy and birth outcomes. From a physician point of view, managing IBD in pregnancy is challenging. Disease activity is the major cause of poor pregnancy outcomes and, therefore, achieving and maintaining IBD remission for the whole duration of pregnancy is the main therapeutic goal. The challenges in selecting therapy lie in balancing the proven efficacy of each drug with the level of safety uncertainty. Except for methotrexate and thalidomide, for which it exits an absolute contraindication in pregnancy, the evidence actually available suggest that most medications can be safely used during pregnancy if appropriately prescribed. The risks associated with drug withdrawal may be higher than the known risks of the medications themselves on pregnancy outcomes. However, all the decisions should be shared with the patient, all available information should be discussed and any therapeutic strategy must be tailored according to patient's context, including disease pattern, activity, severity and acceptance of risk.

The patient's active involvement is an emerging hot-topic, which can be applied in to the management of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Since in this field most of the therapeutic strategies are not based on sturdy scientific evidences, the patient's role has become central and it is believed essential for any patients to have an active cognitive, behavioural and emotive profile. Moreover different patient's aspects should be considered, such as the patient's activation, the patient's engagement and the patient's disease knowledge. The initial evidences available on this topic within IBD context have showed how a higher patient's active profile and a deeper disease knowledge have had a positive effect on compliance, perceived health-care satisfaction, self-management and health costs. Therefore, considering the favourable outcomes so far highlighted, we hope that the evaluation of patient's involvement may become a standard procedure, allowing patients who need it to undergo active programmes which have proved to be effective in improving patient's degree of activation.

Inflammatory bowel diseases, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic relapsing conditions that may result in progressive bowel damage, high risk of complications, surgery and permanent disability. The conventional therapeutic approach for inflammatory bowel diseases is based mainly on symptom control. Unfortunately, a symptom-based therapeutic approach has little impact on major long-term disease outcomes. In other chronic disabling conditions such as diabetes, hypertension and rheumatoid arthritis, the development of new therapeutic approaches has led to better outcomes. In this context a "treat to target" strategy has been developed. This strategy is based on identification of high-risk patients, regular assessment of disease activity by means of objective measures, adjustment of treatment to reach the pre-defined target. A treat to target approach has recently been proposed for inflammatory bowel disease with the aim at modifying the natural history of the disease. In this review, the evidence and the limitations of the treat to target paradigm in inflammatory bowel disease are analyzed and discussed.

In the last years the therapeutic goals of inflammatory bowel disease have changed from control of symptoms only towards long term strategies aimed at modifying the natural history of the disease. In this setting mucosal healing has emerged as an important therapeutic goal both in clinical trials and in clinical practice. Growing evidence suggests that mucosal healing may be associated with lower relapse rates, reduced hospitalizations and reduced need of surgery both in ulcerative colitis and in Crohn's disease. However, a validated definition of mucosal healing is lacking: as a consequence, although several drugs are capable of inducing and maintaining mucosal healing in different clinical settings, the effect size of different treatments is difficult to assess. One of the most important question for clinical practice is if we should systematically assess mucosal healing in all patients and target our treatment strategies to achieve mucosal healing. This review focuses on the definition of mucosal healing and on the ability of different medications to induce and maintain mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease. The significance of mucosal healing as a surrogate end point of disease outcome is also discussed.

Identify environmental factors that can influence the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is of great interest since managing on these factors might improve the prognosis of patients. No environmental factor has been shown to have a linear cause-and-effect link with the relapse of the disease, but many environmental factors (smoking, diet, medications, stress, etc.) seem to play a plausible role in influencing the clinical course of IBD. The aim of this review is to describe the current evidence of the impact of different environmental factors on the long-term course of IBD and to give practical indications that can help doctors and patients in the management of IBD.