Search

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the performance of automated surface-guided gating for left-sided breast cancer with DIBH and VMAT., Materials and Methods: Patients treated in the first year after introduction of DIBH with VMAT were retrospectively considered for analysis. With automated surface-guided gating the beam automatically switches on/off, if the surface region of interest moved in/out the gating tolerance (±3 mm, ±3°). Patients were coached to hold their breath as long as comfortably possible. Depending on the patient's preference, patients received audio instructions during treatment delivery. Real-time positional variations of the breast/chest wall surface with respect to the reference surface were collected, for all three orthogonal directions. The durations and number of DIBHs needed to complete dose delivery, and DIBH position variations were determined. To evaluate an optimal gating window threshold, smaller tolerances of ±2.5 mm, ±2.0 mm, and ±1.5 mm were simulated., Results: 525 fractions from 33 patients showed that median DIBH duration was 51 s (range: 30-121 s), and median 4 DIBHs per fraction were needed to complete VMAT dose delivery. Median intra-DIBH stability and intrafractional DIBH reproducibility approximated 1.0 mm in each direction. No large differences were found between patients who preferred to perform the DIBH procedure with (n = 21) and without audio-coaching (n = 12). Simulations demonstrated that gating window tolerances could be reduced from ±3.0 mm to ±2.0 mm, without affecting beam-on status., Conclusion: Independent of the use of audio-coaching, this study demonstrates that automated surface-guided gating with DIBH and VMAT proved highly efficient. Patients' DIBH performance far exceeded our expectations compared to earlier experiences and literature. Furthermore, gating window tolerances could be reduced., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The use of motion mitigation techniques such as breath-hold can reduce the dosimetric uncertainty of lung cancer proton therapy. We studied the feasibility of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy field delivery within a single breath-hold at PSI's Gantry 2., Methods: In PBS proton therapy, the delivery time for a field is determined by the beam-on time and the dead time between proton spots (the time required to change the energy and/or lateral position). We studied ways to reduce beam-on and lateral scanning time, without sacrificing dosimetric plan quality, aiming at a single field delivery time of 15 seconds at maximum. We tested this approach on 10 lung cases with varying target volumes. To reduce the beam-on time, we increased the beam current at the isocenter by developing new beam optics for PSI's PROSCAN beamline and Gantry 2. To reduce the dead time between the spots, we used spot-reduced plan optimization., Results: We found that it is possible to achieve conventional fractionated (2 Gy(RBE)/fraction) and hypofractionated (6 Gy(RBE)/fraction) field delivery times within a single breath-hold (<15 sec) for a variety non-small-cell lung cancer cases., Conclusion: In summary, the combination of spot reduction and improved beam line transmission is a promising approach for the treatment of mobile tumours within clinically achievable breath-hold durations., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We developed a training protocol based on Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation in order to prolong breath-hold while nearly suppressing the thorax motion. This protocol allowed ten subjects to achieve a 20-minutes-breath-hold, while reducing the residual surface motion to 1 mm around its mean position for more than 95% of the breath-hold duration., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Purpose: Multiple, short breath-holds are now used in single radiotherapy treatment sessions. Here we investigated the feasibility and safety of multiple prolonged breath-holds in a single session. We measured how long is a second breath-hold if we prematurely terminate a single, prolonged breath-hold of >5 min either by using a single breath of oxygen (O 2 ), or by reintroducing preoxygenation and hypocapnia. We also investigated the feasibility and safety of undertaking 9 prolonged breath-holds in a row., Materials & Methods: 30 healthy volunteers with no previous breath-holding experience were trained to perform single prolonged breath-holds safely., Results: Their mean single, prolonged breath-hold duration was 6.1 ± 0.3 se minutes (n = 30). In 18/18 subjects, premature termination (at 5.1 ± 0.2 min) with a single breath of 60% O 2 , enabled a 2nd safe breath-hold lasting 3.3 ± 0.2 min. In 18/18 subjects, premature termination at 5.3 ± 0.2 min) by reintroducing preoxygenation and hypocapnia, enabled a 2nd safe breath-hold lasting 5.8 ± 0.3 min. 17/17 subjects could safely perform 9 successive prolonged breath-holds, each terminated (at 4.3 ± 0.2 min) by reintroducing preoxygenation and hypocapnia for 3.1 ± 0.2 min. The 9th unconstrained breath-hold (mean of 6.0 ± 0.3 min) lasted as long as their single breath-hold., Conclusions: Multiple prolonged breath-holds are possible and safe. In a ∼19 min treatment session, it would therefore be possible to have ∼13 min for radiotherapy treatment (3 breath-holds) and ∼6 min for setup and recovery. In a 65 min session, it would be possible to have 41 min for radiotherapy and 25 min for setup and recovery., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Motion management in the treatment of lung cancer is necessary to assure highest quality of the delivered radiation therapy. In this study, the breath-hold technique is experimentally investigated for pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton therapy, with respect to the dosimetric effect of residual breath-hold motion., Material and Methods: Three-dimensional (3D)-printed tumours extracted from CT scans of three patients were inserted into a dynamic anthropomorphic breathing phantom. The target was set up to move with the individual patient's tumour motion during breath-hold as previously assessed on fluoroscopy. Target dose was measured with radio-chromic film, and both single field uniform dose (SFUD) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were delivered. Experiments were repeated for each patient without any motion, to compute the relative dose deviation between static and breath-hold cases., Results: SFUD plans showed small dose deviations between static and breath-hold cases, as evidenced by the gamma pass rate (3%, 3 mm) of 85% or higher. Dose deviation was more evident for IMPT plans, with gamma pass rate reduced to 50-70%., Conclusions: The breath-hold technique is robust to residual intra-breath-hold motion for SFUD treatment plans, based on our experimental study. IMPT was less robust with larger detected dose deviations., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Contrary to what is commonly assumed, organs continue to move during breath-holding. We investigated the influence of lung volume on motion magnitude during breath-holding and changes in velocity over the duration of breath-holding., Materials and Methods: Sixteen healthy subjects performed 60-second inhalation breath-holds in room-air, with lung volumes of ∼100% and ∼70% of the inspiratory capacity, and exhalation breath-holds, with lung volumes of ∼30% and ∼0% of the inspiratory capacity. During breath-holding, we obtained dynamic single-slice magnetic-resonance images with a time-resolution of 0.6s. We used 2-dimensional image correlation to obtain the diaphragmatic and pancreatic velocity and displacement during breath-holding., Results: Organ velocity was largest in the inferior-superior direction and was greatest during the first 10s of breath-holding, with diaphragm velocities of 0.41mm/s, 0.29mm/s, 0.16mm/s and 0.15mm/s during BH 100% , BH 70% , BH 30% and BH 0% , respectively. Organ motion magnitudes were larger during inhalation breath-holds (diaphragm moved 9.8 and 9.0mm during BH 100% and BH 70% , respectively) than during exhalation breath-holds (5.6 and 4.3mm during BH 30% and BH 0% , respectively)., Conclusion: Using exhalation breath-holds rather than inhalation breath-holds and delaying irradiation until after the first 10s of breath-holding may be advantageous for irradiation of abdominal tumors., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Left-sided breast radiotherapy (RT) can result in cardiac exposure. This study aims to identify predictive anatomic features in women requiring breath-hold (RT(BH)) for cardiac sparing during adjuvant whole breast RT., Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed free-breathing (FB) CT scans of 80 women previously treated with left-sided breast RT. Unfavourable cardiac anatomy was defined as the number of consecutive axial CT slices (2 mm) in which the anterior chest wall contacted the heart (Contact(Heart)) or left ventricle (Contact(LV)). The sternal angle and Haller Index (HI) were used to measure chest concavity. Position and volume of post-operative cavity was also quantified., Results: Heart mean dose (D(mean)) was strongly correlated with Contact(LV) (r=0.625, p<0.001) and Contact(Heart) (r=0.524, p<0.001) but not significantly correlated with tumor size, cavity volume, heart volume, cavity distance to chest wall, sternal angle, or HI. ROC analysis of Contact(Heart) was most predictive of the need for breath-hold (RT(BH)) technique [Area Under Curve=0.815 (SE: 0.048; 95% CI: 0.721-0.91)] and ⩾25 Contact(Heart) CT slices predicted for heart D(mean) ⩾1.7 Gy (68% sensitivity and 82% specificity)., Conclusion: Contact(Heart) on FB CT of ⩾25 axial slices (2 mm), ⩾50 mm of para-sagittal heart contact, was predictive of higher heart D(mean) and suggest a potential need for RT(BH)., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare mean heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) doses (NTDmean) and positional reproducibility in larger-breasted women receiving left breast radiotherapy using supine voluntary deep-inspiratory breath-hold (VBH) and free-breathing prone techniques., Materials and Methods: Following surgery for early breast cancer, patients with estimated breast volumes >750 cm(3) underwent planning-CT scans in supine VBH and free-breathing prone positions. Radiotherapy treatment plans were prepared, and mean heart and LAD doses were calculated. Patients were randomised to receive one technique for fractions 1-7, before switching techniques for fractions 8-15 (40 Gy/15 fractions total). Daily electronic portal imaging and alternate-day cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging were performed. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean LAD NTDmean between techniques. Population systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) were estimated. Within-patient comparisons between techniques used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests., Results: 34 patients were recruited, with complete dosimetric data available for 28. Mean heart and LAD NTDmean doses for VBH and prone treatments respectively were 0.4 and 0.7 (p<0.001) and 2.9 and 7.8 (p<0.001). Clip-based CBCT errors for VBH and prone respectively were ⩽3.0 mm and ⩽6.5 mm (Σ) and ⩽3.5 mm and ⩽5.4 mm (σ)., Conclusions: In larger-breasted women, supine VBH provided superior cardiac sparing and reproducibility than a free-breathing prone position., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the effects of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and/or voluntary moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (vmDIBH) in the radiation therapy (RT) of left-sided breast cancer including the regional lymph nodes., Materials and Methods: For 13 patients, four treatment combinations were compared; 3D-conformal RT (i.e., forward IMRT) in free-breathing 3D-CRT(FB), 3D-CRT(vmDIBH), 2 partial arcs VMAT(FB), and VMAT(vmDIBH). Prescribed dose was 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions. For 10 additional patients, 3D-CRT and VMAT in vmDIBH only were also compared., Results: Dose conformity, PTV coverage, ipsilateral and total lung doses were significantly better for VMAT plans compared to 3D-CRT. Mean heart dose (D(mean,heart)) reduction in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) was between 0.9 and 8.6 Gy, depending on initial D(mean,heart) (in 3D-CRT(FB) plans). VMAT(vmDIBH) reduced the D(mean,heart) further when D(mean,heart) was still >3.2 Gy in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH). Mean contralateral breast dose was higher for VMAT plans (2.7 Gy) compared to 3DCRT plans (0.7 Gy)., Conclusions: VMAT and 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) significantly reduced heart dose for patients treated with locoregional RT of left-sided breast cancer. When Dmean,heart exceeded 3.2 Gy in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) plans, VMAT(vmDIBH) resulted in a cumulative heart dose reduction. VMAT also provided better target coverage and reduced ipsilateral lung dose, at the expense of a small increase in the dose to the contralateral breast., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)