Search

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is finding an ever-growing role in the evaluation of a wide range of conditions in the abdomen. No longer confined to problem solving regarding abnormalities in solid organs, such as the liver and kidneys, MR imaging is increasingly being applied to the evaluation of the pancreatic and biliary ductal systems and even the bowel. Recent technical advances in hardware and software have allowed the acquisition of MR images that are largely free of artifact secondary to bowel peristalsis or respiratory motion; images providing excellent anatomic detail can now be obtained routinely. Faster sequences have reduced image acquisition time, thereby improving patient acceptance and allowing more efficient utilization of machine time. New three-dimensional sequences allow rapid image acquisition, reducing section misregistration and motion artifact while improving multiplanar reformations. The potential of MR imaging to provide functional and anatomic information is intriguing, and new techniques, including diffusion and perfusion imaging, are being evaluated. This review considers the advances in imaging hardware and pulse sequence design that underlie the increasing role of MR imaging in evaluation of the abdomen and discusses evolving clinical applications.

Purpose: To compare nonenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) with ultrasonography (US) for the depiction of urolithiasis., Materials and Methods: During 9 months, 45 patients (mean age, 44 years; mean weight, 92.5 kg) prospectively underwent both nonenhanced helical CT (5-mm collimation; pitch of 1.5) and US of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. US evaluation included a careful search for ureteral calculi. Presence of calculi and obstruction and incidental diagnoses were recorded. Clinical, surgical, and/or imaging follow-up data were obtained in all patients. The McNemar test was used to compare groups., Results: Diagnoses included 23 ureteral calculi and one each of renal cell carcinoma, appendicitis, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, renal subcapsular hematoma, cholelithiasis, medullary calcinosis, and myelolipoma. CT depicted 22 of 23 ureteral calculi (sensitivity, 96%). US depicted 14 of 23 ureteral calculi (sensitivity, 61%). Differences in sensitivity were statistically significant (P: =.02). Specificity for each technique was 100%. When modalities were compared for the detection of any clinically relevant abnormality (eg, unilateral hydronephrosis and/or urolithiasis in patients with an obstructing calculus), sensitivities of US and CT increased to 92% and 100%, respectively. One case of appendicitis was missed at US, whereas medullary calcinosis and myelolipoma were missed at CT., Conclusion: Nonenhanced CT has a higher sensitivity for the detection of ureteral calculi compared with US.

Purpose: To determine the value of standard, nonfocused computed tomography (CT) in examining patients with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain and suspected appendicitis., Materials and Methods: The CT scans and medical records of 100 consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department with RLQ pain and were clinically suspected of having appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed. Helical CT of both the abdomen and pelvis was performed at 7-mm increments after oral and intravenous contrast material administration. CT scans were evaluated for the presence of appendiceal or other disease. Results were correlated with surgical and pathologic findings in 34 patients or with 3-month clinical follow-up in 66 patients., Results: CT depicted abnormalities in 66 patients (66%). In 59 (59%) patients, the abnormality was located in the pelvis; 23 (39%) of these patients had appendicitis. Seven (7%) patients had abnormalities outside of the pelvis, a region not typically scanned during focused appendiceal imaging. Four of these seven patients required surgery. Thus, if only pelvic focused RLQ CT had been performed, overall sensitivity would have decreased from 99% to 88% (P <.05) and sensitivity for cases necessitating surgery would have decreased from 96% to 82% (P <.05)., Conclusion: Both abdominal and pelvic CT examinations are necessary to increase sensitivity and identify the many possible causes of RLQ pain in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis.

Purpose: To determine whether contrast material-enhanced helical computed tomography (CT) of the thorax and upper abdomen changes the tumor stage and management compared with nonenhanced helical CT in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer., Materials and Methods: During 15 months, any patient in whom lung cancer was strongly suspected or newly diagnosed and who was scheduled for thoracic CT was considered eligible for the study. All patients underwent nonenhanced thoracic helical CT from the lung apices through the adrenal glands and then contrast-enhanced thoracic helical CT from the lung apices through the entire liver. Each study was read independently, and the thoracic radiologic stage was determined. Tissue sampling was performed and the final pathologic stage assigned., Results: Ninety-six patients had a final pathologic diagnosis of lung cancer. There was agreement in stage between the nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced examinations in 92 of the 96 patients. In three patients, the tumor stage at nonehanced CT increased at contrast-enhanced CT, from IA to IIA (n = 1), IIB to IV (n = 1), and IIIB to IV (n = 1). In one patient, the tumor stage decreased from IIIB to IIB. There was no substantial change in management of any patient., Conclusion: The results suggest that contrast-enhanced thoracic CT through the liver for staging lung cancer rarely changes the tumor stage determined with nonenhanced CT through the adrenal glands and does not substantially influence management decisions.