Search

Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Background Dark-field chest radiography allows for assessment of lung alveolar structure by exploiting wave optical properties of x-rays. Purpose To evaluate the qualitative and quantitative features of dark-field chest radiography in participants with pulmonary emphysema as compared with those in healthy control subjects. Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted from October 2018 to October 2020, participants aged at least 18 years who underwent clinically indicated chest CT were screened for participation. Inclusion criteria were an ability to consent to the procedure and stand upright without help. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, serious medical conditions, and any lung condition besides emphysema that was visible on CT images. Participants were examined with a clinical dark-field chest radiography prototype that simultaneously acquired both attenuation-based radiographs and dark-field chest radiographs. Dark-field coefficients were tested for correlation with each participant's CT-based emphysema index using the Spearman correlation test. Dark-field coefficients of adjacent groups in the semiquantitative Fleischner Society emphysema grading system were compared using a Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test. The capability of the dark-field coefficient to enable detection of emphysema was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Results A total of 83 participants (mean age, 65 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 52 men) were studied. When compared with images from healthy participants, dark-field chest radiographs in participants with emphysema had a lower and inhomogeneous dark-field signal intensity. The locations of focal signal intensity loss on dark-field images corresponded well with emphysematous areas found on CT images. The dark-field coefficient was negatively correlated with the quantitative CT-based emphysema index ( r = -0.54, P < .001). Participants with Fleischner Society grades of mild, moderate, confluent, or advanced destructive emphysema exhibited a lower dark-field coefficient than those without emphysema (eg, 1.3 m -1 ± 0.6 for participants with confluent or advanced destructive emphysema vs 2.6 m -1 ± 0.4 for participants without emphysema; P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detection of mild emphysema was 0.79. Conclusion Pulmonary emphysema leads to reduced signal intensity on dark-field chest radiographs, showing the technique has potential as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of lung diseases. © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorial by Hatabu and Madore in this issue.

Background X-ray dark-field radiography takes advantage of the wave properties of x-rays, with a relatively high signal in the lungs due to the many air-tissue interfaces in the alveoli. Purpose To describe the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of x-ray dark-field images in healthy human subjects. Materials and Methods Between October 2018 and January 2020, patients of legal age who underwent chest CT as part of their diagnostic work-up were screened for study participation. Inclusion criteria were a normal chest CT scan, the ability to consent, and the ability to stand upright without help. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, serious medical conditions, and changes in the lung tissue, such as those due to cancer, pleural effusion, atelectasis, emphysema, infiltrates, ground-glass opacities, or pneumothorax. Images of study participants were obtained by using a clinical x-ray dark-field prototype, recently constructed and commissioned at the authors' institution, to simultaneously acquire both attenuation-based and dark-field thorax radiographs. Each subject's total dark-field signal was correlated with his or her lung volume, and the dark-field coefficient was correlated with age, sex, weight, and height. Results Overall, 40 subjects were included in this study (average age, 62 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 26 men, 14 women). Normal human lungs have high signal, while the surrounding osseous structures and soft tissue have very low and no signal, respectively. The average dark-field signal was 2.5 m -1 ± 0.4 of examined lung tissue. There was a correlation between the total dark-field signal and the lung volume ( r = 0.61, P < .001). No difference was found between men and women ( P = .78). Also, age ( r = -0.18, P = .26), weight ( r = 0.24, P = .13), and height ( r = 0.01, P = .96) did not influence dark-field signal. Conclusion This study introduces qualitative and quantitative values for x-ray dark-field imaging in healthy human subjects. The quantitative x-ray dark-field coefficient is independent from demographic subject parameters, emphasizing its potential in diagnostic assessment of the lung. ©RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Hatabu and Madore in this issue.

Background An artificial intelligence model that assesses primary bone tumors on radiographs may assist in the diagnostic workflow. Purpose To develop a multitask deep learning (DL) model for simultaneous bounding box placement, segmentation, and classification of primary bone tumors on radiographs. Materials and Methods This retrospective study analyzed bone tumors on radiographs acquired prior to treatment and obtained from patient data from January 2000 to June 2020. Benign or malignant bone tumors were diagnosed in all patients by using the histopathologic findings as the reference standard. By using split-sample validation, 70% of the patients were assigned to the training set, 15% were assigned to the validation set, and 15% were assigned to the test set. The final performance was evaluated on an external test set by using geographic validation, with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CIs being used for classification, the intersection over union (IoU) being used for bounding box placements, and the Dice score being used for segmentations. Results Radiographs from 934 patients (mean age, 33 years ± 19 [standard deviation]; 419 women) were evaluated in the internal data set, which included 667 benign bone tumors and 267 malignant bone tumors. Six hundred fifty-four patients were in the training set, 140 were in the validation set, and 140 were in the test set. One hundred eleven patients were in the external test set. The multitask DL model achieved 80.2% (89 of 111; 95% CI: 72.8, 87.6) accuracy, 62.9% (22 of 35; 95% CI: 47, 79) sensitivity, and 88.2% (67 of 76; CI: 81, 96) specificity in the classification of bone tumors as malignant or benign. The model achieved an IoU of 0.52 ± 0.34 for bounding box placements and a mean Dice score of 0.60 ± 0.37 for segmentations. The model accuracy was higher than that of two radiologic residents (71.2% and 64.9%; P = .002 and P < .001, respectively) and was comparable with that of two musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologists (83.8% and 82.9%; P = .13 and P = .25, respectively) in classifying a tumor as malignant or benign. Conclusion The developed multitask deep learning model allowed for accurate and simultaneous bounding box placement, segmentation, and classification of primary bone tumors on radiographs. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Carrino in this issue.