Search

One method for performing effective shoulder arthrography with a fluoroscopically guided anterior approach is described. The technique can ensure success while injury to the cartilaginous labrum is avoided, which is essential when arthrography is performed in conjunction with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The key features of the technique include supine positioning of the patient with the shoulder in external rotation, marking the skin just lateral to the humeral head cortex, inserting the needle perpendicular to the fluoroscopy beam, testing the injection with an anesthetic agent, and confirming intraarticular needle placement with iodinated contrast material. The procedure can be followed by an injection of dilute gadolinium solution for subsequent MR imaging. Proper patient and needle positioning as well as accurate confirmation of intraarticular needle placement are critical to a successful and atraumatic shoulder arthrographic examination. © RSNA, 2003

Ultrasonography (US) allows detection of a variety of soft-tissue foreign bodies, including wood splinters, glass, metal, and plastic, along with evaluation of their associated soft-tissue complications. Cases were obtained from the authors' clinical experience over the past 1.5 years. Surgical correlation allowed confirmation of the presence of a foreign body and associated soft-tissue complications in all cases. All of the foreign bodies were echogenic when imaged with US. A surrounding hypoechoic rim and posterior acoustic shadowing or reverberation aided detection in several cases. Associated soft-tissue complications included a complete laceration of the posterior tibial tendon and septic flexor digitorum tenosynovitis. US allows accurate and efficient detection of radiolucent soft-tissue foreign bodies and aids assessment of their associated complications. For radiopaque foreign bodies, US can provide more precise localization and improved assessment of the surrounding soft tissues. US has emerged as the study of choice for detection and localization of radiolucent soft-tissue foreign bodies and can aid assessment of their associated complications.

Complex knee injuries are common, often resulting from multiple forces: varus, valgus, hyperextension, hyperflexion, internal rotation, external rotation, anterior or posterior translation, and axial load. Certain combinations of forces are known to cause specific injury patterns. After a review of the literature, the authors developed a mechanism-based classification system based on patterns of bone marrow edema and ligament injury for complex knee injuries depicted at magnetic resonance imaging. The classification system takes into account knee position and forces and recognition of patterns of bone injury and complementary soft-tissue injury. Ten mechanism-based injury patterns were recognized: (a) pure hyperextension, (b) hyperextension with varus, (c) hyperextension with valgus, (d) pure valgus, (e) pure varus, (f) flexion with valgus and external rotation, (g) flexion with varus and internal rotation, (h) flexion with posterior tibial translation, (i) patellar dislocation (flexion, valgus, and internal rotation of femur on fixed tibia), and (j) direct trauma. Recognition of these patterns may help assess the full extent of knee injury, particularly at the posterolateral and posteromedial corners of the knee.

After plain radiography has been performed, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is considered the modality of choice for the evaluation of suspected musculoskeletal lesions because of its exquisite sensitivity to changes in the signal intensity of marrow and soft tissue. That sensitivity, however, may lead to an overestimation of the aggressiveness and extent of some benign bone lesions, particularly in children. Such lesions include chondroblastoma, osteoid osteoma, eosinophilic granuloma, and stress fractures. Potentially misleading MR features commonly seen include prominent marrow edema, soft-tissue edema, and apparent mass effect adjacent to the bone lesion. Features that these lesions have in common that may explain the MR findings include associated inflammatory reactions caused by the lesions and their occurrence in childhood, when the periosteum is more loosely attached. Knowledge of the potential pitfalls encountered with MR imaging may help explain the discrepancy between the radiographic and MR appearances of these benign lesions and avoid misplaced reliance on MR imaging for a diagnosis. Radiography remains the single most valuable modality in determining a differential diagnosis for bone lesions.

Many diagnostic modalities may be used to evaluate articular cartilage. Plain radiography remains the preferred initial study for cartilage evaluation, although even specialized views such as weight-bearing, tunnel, and flexion lateral projections are insensitive in the detection of early cartilage loss. Compared with newer modalities, conventional arthrography has limited capacity for the assessment of cartilage. Computed tomography performed after intraarticular injection of contrast material (ie, CT arthrography) has improved accuracy but is essentially limited to the axial plane. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, with its superb soft-tissue contrast and multiplanar capabilities, has shown promise in depicting articular cartilage. Cartilage is best depicted when an "arthrogram effect" is present, achieved with T2-weighted spin-echo imaging, with some gradient-echo pulse sequences, and when intraarticular contrast material is used. If performed with such techniques, MR imaging is the method of choice for evaluating specific cartilage loss, osteochondritis dissecans, and other osteochondral abnormalities.

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are extremely useful in the accurate diagnosis of anterior knee pain, a common complaint arising from numerous causes (including fracture, chondromalacia patellae, and alignment and tracking abnormalities). Plain CT is effective for evaluating intraosseous lesions of the knee. Although CT arthrography provides excellent visualization of the patellar articular cartilage, the technique is expensive and invasive. Cine CT is an excellent method for assessing patellofemoral tracking and alignment. Kinematic MR imaging can also perform this function. In addition, MR imaging can provide valuable information concerning the status of patellar cartilage. Although MR imaging can accurately show high-grade chondromalacia patellae, it is less accurate in the detection of low-grade disease. The authors believe that MR imaging and plain radiography offer radiologists the greatest latitude in making a specific diagnosis of the cause of anterior knee pain; however, CT is a useful alternative.

This paper presents examples of non-neoplastic lesions of the spine that produce focal or diffuse signal alterations on MR images, and that may, therefore, be confused with metastases or primary neoplasms. Examples include endplate changes associated with degenerative disk disease, hemispherical spondylosclerosis, osteoporotic compression fractures, Paget's disease, focal and diffuse fatty infiltration, osteomyelitis, and changes associated with various arthritides. Distinguishing signal intensity characteristics on T1 and T2 weighted images and distinctive morphology are emphasized.