Search

This research utilizes computational methods to examine crisis communication scholarship from 2010 to 2020 in two studies with a census of all articles in Public Relations Review and the Journal of Public Relations Research (n = 1293 articles, 7400,685 words). Results indicate crisis scholarship has expanded beyond its prior focus on reputation repair. Situational crisis communication theory and image repair are compared in volume of scholarship and methodological affinity. Social media, SCCT, and media relations are identified as central topics within crisis communication scholarship. • Two studies examine the crisis paradigm in public relations using all text in two SSCI journals from 2010 to 2020. • Crisis scholarship has broadened to include non-reputation topics following the path set forth by Liu and Fraustino (2014). • Reputation research using situational crisis communication theory has grown significantly and remains largely quantitative. • Research using image repair theory is declining as a percentage of crisis scholarship and remains predominantly rhetorical. • Social media, SCCT, and media relations are identified as central topics within crisis communication scholarship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • Image repair's conception of crisis, attributed responsibility with offensiveness, is suggested to replace SCCT's approach. • Valid scales measuring responsibility for crisis offensiveness are created from expert interviews and an experiment. • Offensiveness has two dimensions: offensiveness that negatively influences reputation, and virtuousness that mitigates harms to reputation. • Offensiveness and virtuousness predict 73.7% of reputation change from crisis, compared with 24.8% explained by attribution. • Scholars can use the new scales to advance crisis theory, while practitioners can use them to measure crisis responses. Abstract Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) suggests attributed responsibility is the key factor explaining the reputation threat posed by crisis situations. However, studies on SCCT have found using its prescribed responses has a small effect. This research uses image repair theory's conception of crisis to suggest that offensiveness is another factor that should be measured in order to explain the reputation threat posed by crisis. Using the literature of moral foundations theory, interviews with 20 people with expertise in public relations, and 338 participants from mTurk in a 2 (attributed responsibility) × 10 (crisis offensiveness) experiment, this research develops valid, reliable measures of attributed responsibility for crisis offensiveness, and mitigating virtuousness, that explain 73.7% of the reputation threat posed by crisis in the sample, as opposed to 24.8% explained by attributed responsibility alone in the same sample. Implications for public relations scholars and practitioners are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) prescribes crisis response strategies for organizations facing crisis. A meta-analysis of SCCT suggests using the prescribed responses has, at most, a small effect on reputation, while a few studies have shown that the base crisis responses (instructing information and adjusting information) may have a larger effect on reputation. This experiment compares the effects of SCCT's prescribed responses, instructing information, and adjusting information on reputation in an experiment with 989 participants recruited from mTurk. It finds that instructing information has a very large effect on reputation, while adjusting information has a small but significant effect on reputation. In this sample, SCCT's prescribed response strategies have no significant effect on reputation. The experiment proposes the revised model of reputation repair (REMREP) as a tool for understanding how crisis influences reputation. The model incorporates virtuousness and offensiveness, which demonstrates the importance of organizational virtuousness in handling a crisis. Implications for theory and practitioners are discussed. • An experiment tests the effects of instructing information, adjusting information, and SCCT's prescribed responses on reputation. • Instructing information has a very large effect on reputation. • Adjusting information has a small effect on reputation. • Offensiveness and virtuousness can replace attributed responsibility in the model of reputation repair. • The revised model of reputation repair explains the effects of virtuousness and offensiveness on reputation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]