Search

Rationale: The endocannabinoid system (ECS) comprises the cannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol and the cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (Cnr1 and Cnr2). The function of these receptors in relation to zebrafish larval behavior is poorly understood, even though the zebrafish larva has become a versatile animal model in biomedical research. Objectives: The objective of the present study is to characterize the function of Cnr1 and Cnr2 in relation to behavior in zebrafish. Methods: Behavioral analysis of zebrafish larvae was performed using a visual motor response (VMR) test, which allows locomotor activity to be determined under basal conditions and upon a dark challenge. Results: Treatment with the non-specific Cnr agonists WIN55,212-2 and CP55,940 resulted in a decrease in locomotion. This was observed for both basal and challenge-induced locomotion, although the potency for these two effects was different, which suggests different mechanisms of action. In addition, WIN55,212-2 increased the reaction time of the startle response after the dark challenge. Using the Cnr1 antagonist AM251 and a cnr1−/− mutant line, it was shown that the effects were mediated by Cnr1 and not Cnr2. Interestingly, administration of the antagonist AM251 alone does not have an effect on locomotion, which indicates that endogenous cannabinoid activity does not affect locomotor activity of zebrafish larvae. Upon repeated dark challenges, the WIN55,212-2 effect on the locomotor activity decreased, probably due to desensitization of Cnr1. Conclusions: Taken together, these results show that Cnr1 activation by exogenous endocannabinoids modulates both basal and challenge-induced locomotor activity in zebrafish larvae and that these behavioral effects can be used as a readout to monitor the Cnr1 responsiveness in the zebrafish larva model system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Previous studies have demonstrated that the activation and blockade of the cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1) leads to an enhancement and decrease of the consumption of food and other orally ingested reinforcers, respectively. Objective: To gain further knowledge about the role of CB1 in sucrose/saccharin reinforcing efficacy and intake, we tested CB1 knockout (CB1-KO) and littermate wild-type (WT) control mice in several self-administration experimental protocols. Methods: Operant (fixed or progressive ratio schedule) and non-operant conditioning procedures were used. In addition, a choice analysis based on the "matching law" as well as a microstructural analysis of the intra-session pattern of self-administration was performed. Results: CB1-KO mice consume less sucrose under operant conditions or when using a two-bottle free choice procedure. Moreover, as revealed by additional behavioural analysis, CB1-KO mice exhibit a decreased sensitivity to the rewarding properties of sucrose. In agreement with this finding, the differences between WT and CB1-KO mice faded away when the palatability of sucrose was devaluated by adding quinine, but not when a non-caloric sweetener, saccharin, was available. Conclusions: These results demonstrate a modulatory role of CB1 in the determination of the rewarding properties of sucrose and probably, as suggested by previous studies, other reinforcers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]