1. Association Between Fidelity to the Strengths Model of Case Management and Client Outcomes: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
- Author
-
Latimer, Eric, Aubry, Tim, Barrett, Beverley, Bergeron-Leclerc, Christiane, Briand, Catherine, Durbin, Janet, Goscha, Rick, Krupa, Terry, Roebuck, Maryann, Vallée, Catherine, Setliff, Alissa, and Yauck, Mamadou
- Subjects
- *
WELL-being , *COMPETITION (Psychology) , *SAMPLE size (Statistics) , *RESEARCH methodology , *CONVALESCENCE , *SELF-evaluation , *HEALTH outcome assessment , *REGRESSION analysis , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *REHABILITATION of people with mental illness , *FUNCTIONAL assessment , *SELF-efficacy , *PSYCHOMETRICS , *COMPARATIVE studies , *QUALITY of life , *EMPLOYMENT , *HOSPITAL care , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *MEDICAL case management , *GOAL (Psychology) - Abstract
Objective: Evidence concerning strengths model of case management (SMCM) remains mixed. This study aimed to test the hypotheses that higher fidelity to SMCM is associated with improved quality of life (QoL), hope, community participation, community functioning, more days of competitive employment and of independent living, and fewer days of hospitalization. Methods: SMCM was implemented over a 3-year period, at seven sites in the Canadian provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador, Québec, and Ontario. Independent assessors visited 14 teams at the seven sites to evaluate fidelity at baseline and 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months later. Participants (N = 311) answered standardized questionnaires at 4.5-month intervals up to 18 months. Fidelity assessments were interpolated so they could be associated with questionnaire responses. Linear mixed-effects models and generalized linear models were estimated. Results: Fidelity increased significantly, with all sites except one achieving or approaching good fidelity within 36 months. Fidelity was not significantly associated with any of the outcome measures, although all estimated directions of relationships were consistent with our hypotheses. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: In a pragmatic study of real-world implementation of the strengths model at seven sites, no statistically significant relationships between fidelity and outcomes were found. Low variation in fidelity across individuals, modest sample size, and limited ability to detect change over 18 months, may have contributed to these null findings. Impact and Implications: Implementation of strengths model of case management (SMCM) was largely successful at seven sites in three Canadian provinces, but higher fidelity was not significantly associated with improved client outcomes. The sample size of 311 may have been insufficient. Given mixed findings from previous studies, and the compatibility of SMCM with a recovery orientation, further research, with strong designs and large sample sizes, is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF