Search

Pierre Janet expounded repeatedly, in his writings, the three main differences between his theory, that he had called psychological analysis, and Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory. First, the concept of narrowing of consciousness as the direct effect of vehement emotions is quite different from the idea of an active defensive process displacing unacceptable mental contents outside consciousness. Second, Janet's concept of the sub-conscious (le subconscient) diverges significantly from Freud's view of the Unconscious. Third, Janet's rejected what he labeled Freud's pan-sexualism. This paper is a cursory examination of contemporary psychological and neuroscience contributions to psychotraumatology that may be matched with Janet's three contentions about the main differences between his ideas and Freud's. The aim of the paper is to foster in the reader a reflection on how contemporary psychotraumatology may provide a common background for examining what seems more vital nowadays of the two divergent roots, French and Austrian, of dynamic psychiatry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]