Search

Allosteric regulation underlies living cells' ability to sense changes in nutrient and signaling-molecule concentrations, but the ability to computationally design allosteric regulation into non-allosteric proteins has been elusive. Allosteric-site design is complicated by the requirement to encode the relative stabilities of active and inactive conformations of the same protein in the presence and absence of both ligand and effector. To address this challenge, we used Rosetta to design the backbone of the flexible heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3), and used geometric matching and sequence optimization to place a Zn2+ -coordination site in a fluorescein-binding antibody. We predicted that due to HCDR3's flexibility, the fluorescein-binding pocket would configure properly only upon Zn2+ application. We found that regulation by Zn2+ was reversible and sensitive to the divalent ion's identity, and came at the cost of reduced antibody stability and fluorescein-binding affinity. Fluorescein bound at an order of magnitude higher affinity in the presence of Zn2+ than in its absence, and the increase in fluorescein affinity was due almost entirely to faster fluorescein on-rate, suggesting that Zn2+ preorganized the antibody for fluorescein binding. Mutation analysis demonstrated the extreme sensitivity of Zn2+ regulation on the atomic details in and around the metal-coordination site. The designed antibody could serve to study how allosteric regulation evolved from non-allosteric binding proteins, and suggests a way to designing molecular sensors for environmental and biomedical targets.

We protein engineers are ambivalent about evolution: on the one hand, evolution inspires us with myriad examples of biomolecular binders, sensors, and catalysts; on the other hand, these examples are seldom well-adapted to the engineering tasks we have in mind. Protein engineers have therefore modified natural proteins by point substitutions and fragment exchanges in an effort to generate new functions. A counterpoint to such design efforts, which is being pursued now with greater success, is to completely eschew the starting materials provided by nature and to design new protein functions from scratch by using de novo molecular modeling and design. While important progress has been made in both directions, some areas of protein design are still beyond reach. To this end, we advocate a synthesis of these two strategies: by using design calculations to both recombine and optimize fragments from natural proteins, we can build stable and as of yet un-sampled structures, thereby granting access to an expanded repertoire of conformations and desired functions. We propose that future methods that combine phylogenetic analysis, structure and sequence bioinformatics, and atomistic modeling may well succeed where any one of these approaches has failed on its own.

Protein-design methodology can now generate models of protein structures and interfaces with computed energies in the range of those of naturally occurring structures. Comparison of the properties of native structures and complexes to isoenergetic design models can provide insight into the properties of the former that reflect selection pressure for factors beyond the energy of the native state. We report here that sidechains in native structures and interfaces are significantly more constrained than designed interfaces and structures with equal computed binding energy or stability, which may reflect selection against potentially deleterious non-native interactions.

The functional sites of many protein families are dominated by diverse backbone regions that lack secondary structure (loops) but fold stably into their functionally competent state. Nevertheless, the design of structured loop regions from scratch, especially in functional sites, has met with great difficulty. We therefore developed an approach, called AbDesign, to exploit the natural modularity of many protein families and computationally assemble a large number of new backbones by combining naturally occurring modular fragments. This strategy yielded large, atomically accurate, and highly efficient proteins, including antibodies and enzymes exhibiting dozens of mutations from any natural protein. The combinatorial backbone‐conformation space that can be accessed by AbDesign even for a modestly sized family of homologs may exceed the diversity in the entire PDB, providing the sub‐Ångstrom level of control over the positioning of active‐site groups that is necessary for obtaining highly active proteins. This manuscript describes how to implement the pipeline using code that is freely available at https://github.com/Fleishman‐Lab/AbDesign_for_enzymes.