Search

Purpose/objectives: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services funded a project in six western states to decrease the payment error rate in short-stay admissions (< or =2 days) and decrease the number of inpatient discharges for short stays. Seventeen hospitals were recruited to implement the Case Management Assignment Protocol (CMAP), which standardizes the decision-making process at admission, thereby increasing the number of hospitalized patients assigned to the correct status of inpatient or observation., Primary Practice Setting: Acute care hospitals., Findings/conclusions: Based on the decrease in unnecessary admissions and the relationship between use of the protocol and correct admission status, the project demonstrated that the CMAP was effective in ensuring that patients were placed in the appropriate status., Implications for Case Management Practice: 1. Case managers can play a key role in correct assignment of patient status through the use of the CMAP. 2. Hospitals that were successful in implementing the protocol had highly involved senior management, stable corporate environments, physician buy-in, physician champions, policies for mandatory use within the facilities, support from all team members, and "out-of-the-box" thinking for case management coverage. 3. Staffs at hospitals that implemented the protocol indicate they are well positioned for the Recovery Audit Contractor program, which began as a 3-year demonstration project and is now being implemented. It will be in place nationally by 2010.

Purpose/objectives: Each year in the United States, more than 4.4 million patients with chest pain (DRG 143) present to emergency departments. Many of these admissions do not have documented justification to support an acute inpatient admission. Two Medicare quality improvement organizations identified this as a common theme, and special projects were designed and implemented to reduce the incidence of inappropriate hospital admissions for chest pain in their states (Florida and Arizona). One commonality to both intervention projects was use of the case management protocol (CMP)., Primary Practice Setting(s): Acute care hospitals., Findings/conclusions: As a result of the special projects, in Florida, there was a 67% reduction in projected admission denials and a 48% overall reduction in chest pain discharges among participating hospitals. In Arizona, the rate of inappropriate 1-day admissions for DRG 143 was reduced 42% from baseline to remeasurement for the participating hospitals; the absolute number of DRG 143 one-day admissions was reduced by 90%. Of the 10 Arizona hospitals that used the case management protocol, 8 met or exceeded the project goals., Implications for Case Management Practice: 1. Although outpatient observation admission status has been around for many years, there remain confusion and resistance to its use. The definitions of clinical status, level of care, and patient status are not well defined, and choosing the correct pathway for each patient can be complex. This article helps clarify "Observation vs. Inpatient"admission status and details lessons learned in reducing resistance. 2. Use of the case management protocol requires a hospital to define case management roles and responsibilities. This is a critical but often neglected task. 3. Use of case management for determining correct patient status is growing. With new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services initiatives, including the recovery audit contractors, case management is a viable solution to maintaining the fiscal health of hospitals.