1. The monaural threshold: the effect of subliminal and audible contralateral and ipsilateral stimuli
- Author
-
J. W. Hughes
- Subjects
Masking (art) ,Resonator ,Tone (musical instrument) ,Range (music) ,Acoustics ,Subliminal stimuli ,General Engineering ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Monaural ,Binaural recording ,General Environmental Science ,Intensity (physics) ,Mathematics - Abstract
Using the experimental technique developed during earlier work on the binaural threshold (Hughes 1938), the effect on the monaural threshold of subliminal notes has now been investigated. It was hoped that the experiments, when carried out with two notes of various frequency differences, would yield information on the extent to which the cochlear resonators postulated by the resonance theory could be influenced by notes of frequencies different from their natural frequencies, and thus permit the determination of the amount of damping to which they were subject. It was anticipated that the threshold of a note of given frequency would be lowered by the simultaneous application to the ear of a second subliminal note provided that the two frequencies were not too far apart. In practice it was found that no matter how different the frequencies, a process of central summation produced such lowering of threshold. The purely physical question of what range of resonators in the cochlea responds to a given exciting tone cannot therefore be investigated in this way. The lowering of threshold of one ear due to simultaneous subliminal stimulation of the other (Hughes 1938) made it of interest to investigate the case when the note applied to the second ear is audible. Previous workers (e.g. Harvey Fletcher 1929) have shown that when a “ masking tone” is well above threshold no change of contralateral threshold is produced. The experimental results described below bear this out in a general way, but the presence of a weak audible tone causes so much difficulty in determining the contralateral threshold that it is not possible to find any critical intensity at which summation ceases. When, however, the two notes were in unison a rise in this threshold occurred, the explanation of which is discussed later.
- Published
- 1940
- Full Text
- View/download PDF