Search

Despite decades of research, the factors that maintain genetic variation for fitness are poorly understood. Mutation selection balance will always contribute to standing variance, but it is unclear what fraction of the variance in a typical fitness component can be explained by mutation-selection balance and whether fitness components differ in this respect. In theory, the level of standing variance in fitness due to mutation-selection balance can be predicted using the rate of fitness decline under mutation accumulation, and this prediction can be directly compared to the actual standing variance observed. This approach allows for controlled statistical tests of the sufficiency of the mutation-selection balance model, and could be used to identify traits or populations where genetic variance is maintained by factors beyond mutation-selection balance. For example, some traits may be influenced by sexually antagonistic balancing selection, resulting in an excess of standing variance beyond that generated by deleterious mutations. To encourage the application of this approach, we describe the underlying theory and use it to test the mutation selection balance model for three traits inDrosophila melanogaster. We find some evidence for non-mutational variance in male mating success and female fecundity relative to larval viability, which is consistent with balancing selection on sexual fitness components. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical limitations to this approach, and discuss how to apply it successfully.