1. V-1 regulates capping protein activity in vivo.
- Author
-
Jung G, Alexander CJ, Wu XS, Piszczek G, Chen BC, Betzig E, and Hammer JA
- Subjects
- Actin Capping Proteins metabolism, Actin-Related Protein 2 genetics, Actin-Related Protein 2 metabolism, Actin-Related Protein 2-3 Complex metabolism, Actin-Related Protein 3 genetics, Actin-Related Protein 3 metabolism, Actins genetics, Actins metabolism, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Chemotaxis genetics, Conserved Sequence, Dictyostelium genetics, Dictyostelium ultrastructure, Gene Expression Regulation, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins metabolism, Kinetics, Mice, Mutation, Phosphorylation, Pinocytosis genetics, Protein Binding, Protein Subunits genetics, Protein Subunits metabolism, Protozoan Proteins metabolism, Pseudopodia genetics, Pseudopodia ultrastructure, Sequence Alignment, Signal Transduction, Actin Capping Proteins genetics, Actin-Related Protein 2-3 Complex genetics, Dictyostelium metabolism, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins genetics, Protozoan Proteins genetics, Pseudopodia metabolism
- Abstract
Capping Protein (CP) plays a central role in the creation of the Arp2/3-generated branched actin networks comprising lamellipodia and pseudopodia by virtue of its ability to cap the actin filament barbed end, which promotes Arp2/3-dependent filament nucleation and optimal branching. The highly conserved protein V-1/Myotrophin binds CP tightly in vitro to render it incapable of binding the barbed end. Here we addressed the physiological significance of this CP antagonist in Dictyostelium, which expresses a V-1 homolog that we show is very similar biochemically to mouse V-1. Consistent with previous studies of CP knockdown, overexpression of V-1 in Dictyostelium reduced the size of pseudopodia and the cortical content of Arp2/3 and induced the formation of filopodia. Importantly, these effects scaled positively with the degree of V-1 overexpression and were not seen with a V-1 mutant that cannot bind CP. V-1 is present in molar excess over CP, suggesting that it suppresses CP activity in the cytoplasm at steady state. Consistently, cells devoid of V-1, like cells overexpressing CP described previously, exhibited a significant decrease in cellular F-actin content. Moreover, V-1-null cells exhibited pronounced defects in macropinocytosis and chemotactic aggregation that were rescued by V-1, but not by the V-1 mutant. Together, these observations demonstrate that V-1 exerts significant influence in vivo on major actin-based processes via its ability to sequester CP. Finally, we present evidence that V-1's ability to sequester CP is regulated by phosphorylation, suggesting that cells may manipulate the level of active CP to tune their "actin phenotype.", Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF