Search

Introduction. In a recent paper [2] R. H. Bruck has introduced the concept of right neoring and discussed some properties of these systems. In particular, he has considered analogues of certain properties of the ring of integers. This paper is essentially a commentary on Bruck's paper and we generalize some of his results as follows. The construction of the universal right neoring in [2] is applied to the free monogenic $3-loop in any subvariety $3 of the variety of loops and a complete analogue of Theorem 4.1 of [2] is obtained for any one of these subvarieties. Then, using a result similar to those obtained in [5], it is shown that this construction yields uncountably many right neorings with an identity which generates the additive loop of the right neoring. Conversely, every right neoring with an identity which generates its additive loop can be obtained from a free monogenic $3-loop by the above construction. Each of these right neorings has some properties resembling those of the ring of integers. One possible answer is given to the question raised by Bruck concerning the existence of universal right neorings with free additive loop of arbitrary rank. A brief proof is given, using the results of [4; 5], of the cancellation properties of the monogenic universal right neoring. Finally, we discuss briefly the relationship between right neorings and the logarithmetics of Etherington.

It is shown that the rings under the title admit an order-theoretical characterization as in the commutative case studied by Abian. Introduction. Let R be an associative ring equipped with the binary relation (^) defined by xay if and only if xy = x2 in R. In this paper, it is shown that ( ^ ) is an order relation on R if and only if, R has no nilpotent elements i9*0). Conditions on the binary relation (g) in order that R split into a direct product of division rings are then studied in the light of Abian's result (l, Theorem l). Using similar argumentation and using certain subdirect representation of rings with no nilpotent elements, one obtains a complete similarity with the commutative case (yet, no extra complication in the computa- tions). Conventions. R is an associative ring which is, unless otherwise stated, with no nilpotent elements (other than 0). As a result of (2), R can be embedded into a direct product of skewdomains, R—* YLiei £i (that is to say, rings R, having no one-sided divisors of zero). The former embedding is fixed throughout the paper. It is therefore legiti- mate to identify any element x in R with the family consisting of all its projections (xj.e/. Finally, all definitions in (l) are extended (verbatim) to the present case (of a noncommutative ring R) and are freely used throughout.

Recently Cameron and Storvick introduced and studied an operator valued function space integral related to the Feynman integral. The main theorems of their study establish the existence of the function space integral as a weak operator limit of operators defined at the first stage by finite-dimensional integrals. This paper provides a substantial strengthening of their existence theorem giving the function space integrals as strong operator limits rather than as weak operator limits.

1. In a recent paper [2] Reich has made the observation that an example of Koebe given in 1918 [1] does not fulfill its asserted purpose. This example was to show that vanishing measure of the complement did not assure that a slit domain was minimal. Reich proceeded to fill the gap by carrying out the following somewhat more general construction. Let A be a compact perfect nowhere dense set on the x-axis in the z-plane (z=x+iy). Then there exists a compact set S in the z-plane with the properties: (i) A is the projection of S on the x-axis, (ii) S is composed of segments symmetric with respect to the x-axis and points on the x-axis, at least one segment being present, (iii) any point in S, not on the x-axis and not at the end of a segment in S, is the limit, both from the left and right, of points of S. Once this construction is performed the desired examples are easily given [2, ?4]. The object of the present paper is to give an alternative construction which is very explicit and direct.

In [4], Phelps showed that in certain function algebras the unit ball is the closed convex hull of its extreme points. The algebra, C(X), of complex valued continuous functions on a compact Hausdorff space, will always have this property. The class of logmodular algebras which have a Gleason part which is total also was shown to have the property. In this paper we give an elementary proof of the first result (a proof which is, in theory at least, constructive). The simplest nontrivial example of a logmodular algebra with a total part is the disk algebra (i.e. the functions continuous on the closed disk and analytic in the interior). For this algebra we show that the extreme points (in fact the exposed points) of the unit ball form a dense subset of the boundary of the unit ball. Let U be the unit ball of C(X). It is well known that q in U is an extreme point of U if I q(x) I = 1 for all x in X. Now if f in U never vanishes, then f is in the closed convex hull of the extreme points; in factf is between two uniquely determined extreme points. We need only observe that for each x in X,f(x) is halfway between two uniquely determined extreme points of the disk and that these points vary continuously with x. Now it is not necessarily the case that each function in U can be approximated by a nonvanishing function. For a counterexample we need only look at h(z) = z in the algebra of continuous functions on the disk. (If If(z)-zj 1/e. Letfi, i = 1, *, N be the retract maps obtained from these rotations. Then I 1/N Efi(z)-z

where the oi are the usual generators of Bn. (See [1; 4].) A textile manufacturer asked the following question: Can one decide whether or not a braid in An is also in Qn? (It is possible to "weave" a braid in Qn while keeping its ends "tied together.") Shepperd [6] solved the above decision problem using the generators and relations of the braid group and subgroups. In this paper we give another distinct solution working in terms of automorphisms of free groups. In particular, we use formulas developed in [3; 4]. The author wishes to thank his teacher, and friend, Professor Wilhelm Magnus who has contributed more than anyone else towards the author's knowledge of mathematics.

This note deals with the correction of a small flaw in the proof of a theorem (and a lemma) in [2]. Also a simpler proof of the theorem in question is given. In the proof of Theorem 2.3 in [2], the statement "that distinct L's cannot belong to a common pure subgroup HL follows immediately from the fact that no two L's generate with G [p] the same subgroup of G" is false as it stands. One has to exercise a little more care in the selection of HL. For example, since the union [xa, Xa]aEA of all the L's (in Lemma 2.1 in [2]) is still linearly independent, there exists according to [1] a pure subgroup H of G supported by S such that HDL for each L. Hence one could choose HL=H for each L. However, all goes well if HL is chosen such that HLn [Xa, XTg aEA =L, as can easily be done. Similar remarks hold for Lemma 3.8 in [2]. A short alternate proof of Theorem 2.3 in [2] is given. In what follows let c be the cardinality of the continuum and Q be the first ordinal whose cardinality is c. The notation and terminology will be the same as that in [2].

M. Rosenblum in [2] presented a most ingenious proof of the Fuglede and Putnam Theorems by means of entire vector valued functions [1, p. 59]. We will demonstrate that some curious properties of bounded Hilbert space operators can be derived from Rosenblum's argument and similar arguments. Throughout this text we mean by an "operator" a bounded linear transformation of a Hilbert space into itself. Given an operator A we mean by "exp A " the uniform limit of the series I+A +A 2/2 1 +A3/3! +A4/4! + * * * . We let A * denote the adjoint of the operator A, and let z* denote the complex conjugate of the complex number z. A "normal" operator is an operator which commutes with its adjoint. A critical fact in the Rosenblum proof is that given a normal operator A and any complex number z, exp (izA) exp (iz*A *) exp (izA +iz*A *) = exp (iz*A *) exp (izA), and this operator is unitary because i(zA +z*A *) is skew hermitian. Our first result states, among other things, that the converse is true; if the above equations hold for a fixed operator A and all complex numbers z, then A is normal.