Search

Background Survival Radiology (SR) is a flagship annual full-day in-person radiology workshop targeted at final year medical students in Singapore to prepare them for internship. Previous in-person editions have consistently received positive reviews from 2014 to 2019. However, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid online pivot for its sixth edition in 2020. Objectives This study aims to (a) identify key success factors of a traditional in-person medical student radiology workshop, (b) describe the rapid online pivot in 2020 and (c) to identify key success factors for online educational initiatives. Methods Post-workshop survey responses of SR from 2014 to 2020 were evaluated. Likert-scale data were quantitatively analysed, while free-text responses were qualitatively analysed. Results A total of 1248 post-workshop surveys (2014–2020 workshops) and 266 free-text responses (2020 workshop) were received from 2640 participants over the years. Progressive changes that sustained or improved participant feedback for in-person SR workshops included adoption of a case-based approach, utility of ‘live’ audience response systems and incorporation of quizzes with a favourable overall feedback rating of 4.42–4.89 from 2014 to 2019. The webinar version of SR in 2020 became the best-rated edition since inception with a rating of 4.9. Qualitative analysis of feedback from SR 2020 showed that the participants preferred the webinar model, online modes of engagement and interactivity. Conclusion Our experience shows that it is not only possible to successfully pivot online for such workshops, but that blended educational formats utilising online engagements supplemented by in-person activities will be well-received by ‘Generation Z’ learners even after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction Urgent radiological studies obtained during on-call hours are often preliminarily read by on-call residents before consultant radiologists finalise the reports at a later time. Such provisional radiology reports provide important information to guide initial patient management. This study aims to determine discrepancy rates between provisional reports and final interpretations, and to assess the clinical significance of such discrepancies. Methods This retrospective quality assurance project reviewed a total of 1218 cross-sectional imaging studies of the body (thorax, abdomen and pelvis) done between July 2015 and May 2016 during on-call hours. The studies included 1201 Computed tomography (CT) scans and 17 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans. Studies with incomplete or unavailable reports were excluded. Conclusions of both the provisional and final reports of each study were reviewed for concordance, with reference to the full report if needed. Discrepancies were graded according to the ACR 2016 RADPEER scoring system. Results There were 1210 studies with complete reports. Discrepant reports were noted in 183 (15.1%) studies. Of these, 89 (7.3%) were assessed to be clinically significant and the majority of these (55) were due to interpretations which should be made most of the time. CT of the abdomen and pelvis were the most prone to discrepant reports, accounting for 148 cases (80.9%). Conclusion The majority of preliminary reports for on-call body scans were concordant with final interpretations. The discrepancy rates for provisional body scan reports provided by residents while on call were comparable to those previously reported in literature.

Abdominal pain is a symptom that is commonly encountered in clinical practice. Evaluation of abdominal pain involves the exclusion of a myriad of possible diagnosis. This case illustrates an uncommon cause of abdominal pain and vomiting in a 55-year-old female with diagnostic radiological features.