Search

Here we seek to control mechanical power output in outdoor cycling by adjusting commanded cadence of a cyclist. To understand cyclist’s dynamic behavior, we had one participant match their cadence to a range of commanded cadences. We then developed a mathematical model that predicts the actual mechanical power as a function of commanded cadence. The average absolute error between the predicted power of our model and the actual power was 15.9 ± 11.7%. We used this model to simulate our closed-loop controller and optimize for proportional and integral controller gains. With these gains in outdoor cycling experiments, the average absolute error between the target and the actual power was 3.2 ± 1.2% and the average variability in power was 2.9 ± 1.3%. The average responsiveness, defined as the required time for the actual power to reach 95% of the target power following changes in target power, was 7.4 ± 2.0 s.