1. Sun protection and vitamin D status in an Australian subtropical community
- Author
-
Naomi Jayaratne, Jolieke C. van der Pols, and Anne Russell
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Epidemiology ,Cross-sectional study ,Sun protection ,Sunburn ,Sunscreening Agents ,Sun protection factor ,Bone Density ,Vitamin D and neurology ,Medicine ,Humans ,Vitamin D ,Aged ,Tropical Climate ,business.industry ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Australia ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Vitamin D intake ,Environmental Exposure ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Calcium, Dietary ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Skin Cancer Prevention ,Female ,Skin cancer ,business ,Sun Protection Factor ,Demography - Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Claims have been made that sun protection may negatively affect vitamin D status, but very few data are available about whether this applies to people in uncontrolled settings. METHOD: In 1996 we measured 25(OH)-vitamin D concentrations in 1113 adults in Nambour, a subtropical community, who reported their concurrent sun protection behaviours in a skin cancer prevention trial. Estimates were adjusted for time outdoors, vitamin D intake and other factors known to affect vitamin D status. RESULTS: Persons who tended to stay in the shade had lower vitamin D levels than those who never stayed in the shade (62.5 vs. 68.8 nmol/L respectively, p=0.01), and this association remained in persons who spent less than 50% (p=0.02) but not in those who spent more than 50% of their time outdoors. Wearing a hat, long sleeves, sunglasses and use of sunscreen or umbrella were not associated with vitamin D status after adjustments, including after stratification by time outdoors. CONCLUSION: Sun protection behaviour to reduce the risk of skin cancer can be maintained without affecting vitamin D serum status, although consistently seeking shade when spending less than 50% of daytime outdoors is associated with lower vitamin D levels.
- Published
- 2012