Search

Alkuraya-Kučinskas syndrome (AKS) is an autosomal recessive multisystem disorder resulting from mutations in the BLTP1 gene, formerly known as KIAA1109. Primary manifestations include brain malformations, arthrogryposis, and clubfeet. Cardiac, renal, and ophthalmologic abnormalities may also be observed, while nonimmune hydrops is rare. We present a case of two novel BLTP1 canonical splice-site variants in a fetus with multiple congenital anomalies, including hydrops, a kinked brainstem, and joint contractures. A systematic literature review was conducted to describe the prenatal phenotype of AKS, which was inspired by our case. Our systematic literature review of the prenatal phenotype in 19 cases, including our additional case, demonstrated joint contractures in 90% (18/20), ventriculomegaly in 60% (12/20), brainstem dysgenesis in 50% (10/20), cerebellar hypoplasia in 50% (10/20), parenchymal thinning with lissencephalic aspect in 60% (12/20), and facial dysmorphism in 70% (14/20) of reported AKS cases. In addition to our case, hydrops was reported in two other families. AKS should be considered in fetal presentations with characteristic features, especially brainstem kinking and joint contractures. Exome sequencing, including coverage of canonical intronic splice-site variants, can clarify the diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03911531., (© 2024 The Author(s). Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To highlight the possibility of genetic discrimination in the United States with respect to carrier screening under limitations of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and to encourage providers to educate patients about this possibility during pretest counseling., Methods: Review of current professional guidelines and practice resources regarding the necessary components of pretest counseling for carrier screening in the context of GINA's limitations and the potential impact of carrier screening results on life, long-term care and disability insurance., Results: Current practice resources advise that patients in the United States should be informed that their employer or health insurance company generally cannot use their genetic information during the underwriting process. However, these resources do not elaborate on GINA's limitations or explain why there may be adverse consequences to patients regarding these limitations. Studies have demonstrated significant gaps in provider knowledge of GINA, especially for those without formal genetic training., Conclusion: Enhanced education and provision of GINA educational resources for providers and patients will help ensure that patients have the opportunity to prioritize their insurance needs prior to undergoing carrier screening., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)