Search

The objective of this work is to present an analysis of two discourses that would build the curriculum issued by the Ministry of Education of the Nation during the government of Mauricio Macri, to uncover these hidden areas, those knowledges and relationships that provide their conditions of possibility and allow us understand why certain rules, concepts, practices and other modes of relationship among subject, education and teaching were established. It tries to ask us: what are the foundations of the new curriculum and what is left of it? What education and what teaching was designed and for which discipline? In other words, it is about understanding the discourses that establish or sense two curricular documents, or the place that the subject occupies, or teach and educação. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article investigates the educational question in the Prison Notebooks from the binomial intellectuals and hegemony. A reference in Latin American critical educational theory, Antonio Gramsci encourages educational studies in the region. However, this assiduous evocation is not often accompanied by a subtle knowledge of the theoretical and historical plot of prison concepts. Hiatus that has become more eloquent in recent decades, when his work is increasingly investigated in a philological key and renewed keys of interpretation emerge. In order to explore the pedagogical topic in Gramsci, the article links the hegemony / intellectuals binomial with the notions of hegemony crisis, passive revolution and permanent revolution. In this way, proposes to address the question of intellectuals and education in the Prison Notebooks through the following series: on the one hand, bourgeois hegemony - passive revolution - passive pedagogy; on the other, proletarian hegemony - permanent revolution - active pedagogy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This reflection article has the purpose to analyze the possibilities of the desire in the school. Thus, a pedagogy of desire is presented, articulated to three educational and curricular principles of the 21st century, as a call to the endurance, to the solidarity and to the responsibility to overcome the hopelessness of the current crises. The text is structured in three parts. In the first, an approach to desire is made --bound to the Eros and to the literature- as a way to confront with financial capitalism. In the second, it deepens in three dimensions of the desiring spirit, under an idea of integration and simultaneity. Finally, the possibilities of the desire in the school educational experience are pointed out. From the above, it is concluded that if the school education aspires to transcend and face the current crises, it must take the desire -and therefore the endurance- as a founding principle of its interactions, where the desire for the other, for oneself and for the knowing is an opportunity that moves to action in search of a preferable common life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]