Search

Screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) is recommended, but numerous barriers exist to implementing SDOH screening in clinical spaces. In this study, the authors identified how both active and passive information retrieval methods may be used in clinical spaces to screen for SDOH and meet patient needs. The authors conducted a retrospective sequential cohort analysis comparing the active identification of SDOH through a patient-led digital manual screening process completed in primary care offices from September 2019 to January 2020 and passive identification of SDOH through natural language processing (NLP) from September 2016 to August 2018, among 1735 patients at a large midwestern tertiary referral hospital system and its associated outlying primary care and outpatient facilities. The percent of patients identified by both the passive and active identification methods as experiencing SDOH varied from 0.3% to 4.7%. The active identification method identified social integration, domestic safety, financial resources, food insecurity, transportation, housing, and stress in proportions ranging from 5% to 36%. The passive method contributed to the identification of financial resource issues and stress, identifying 9.6% and 3% of patients to be experiencing these issues, respectively. SDOH documentation varied by provider type. The combination of passive and active SDOH screening methods can provide a more comprehensive picture by leveraging historic patient interactions, while also eliciting current patient needs. Using passive, NLP-based methods to screen for SDOH will also help providers overcome barriers that have historically prevented screening.

Mammography screening rates are typically lower in those with less economic advantage (EA). This study, conducted at an integrated health care system covering a mixed rurality population, assessed the ability of interventions (text messages linking to a Web microsite, digital health care workers, and a community health fair) to affect mammography screening rates and disparity in those rates among different EA populations. Payor type served as a proxy for greater (commercially insured) versus lower (Medicaid insured) EA. 4,342 subjects were included across the preintervention ("Pre") and postintervention ("Post") periods. Interventions were prospectively applied to all Medicaid subjects and randomly selected commercial subjects. Applying interventions only to lower EA subjects reversed the screening rate disparity (2.6% Pre vs. -3.7% Post, odds ratio [OR] 2.4