1. Effect of solvent type on chemical composition distribution analysis of polyolefins using crystallization elution fractionation (CEF).
- Author
-
Pathaweeisariyakul, Thipphaya, Bangtai, Lalita, and Ortin, Alberto
- Subjects
- *
HIGH density polyethylene , *INFRARED detectors , *METHYL groups , *LOW density polyethylene , *CRYSTALLIZATION - Abstract
For microstructure characterization of polyolefin by separation-based techniques with infrared detector, either 1,2-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) or 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB) is commonly selected as a dissolution solvent and mobile phase. Herein, we studied the effects of o-DCB and TCB on the comonomer detection and chemical composition distribution (CCD) by crystallization elution fractionation (CEF) with a filter-based IR detector. We first compared the detector sensitivity on methyl group content or short chain branching (SCB) in polyethylene-co-butene with varied sample concentrations in o-DCB and TCB. TCB demonstrated superior comonomer detection in the IR detector with a single linear calibration across a wide range of sample concentrations. In contrast, o-DCB displayed stronger concentration dependent methyl group response, requiring a more complex equation in the calibration. Furthermore, o-DCB provided better separation of comonomer distribution with less peak broadening and co-crystallization effects, as observed with various polyolefins, including high density polyethylene (HDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), polypropylene (PP), and ethylene-propylene copolymer (EP). [Display omitted] • Solvent selection (o-DCB or TCB) influences comonomer detection sensitivity, which can be addressed by a modified calibration. • o-DCB offers better separation of the comonomer distribution with minimal peak broadening and co-crystallization effects. • Solvent choice (o-DCB vs. TCB) significantly affects PP peak temperature in CCD analysis, unlike PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF