Search

Introduction: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) constitute a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors with varied biology., Objectives: The aim of this study was to establish the clinical characteristics of patients with GEP-NEN and identify factors influencing their 5-year survival., Patients and Methods: The study included 122 patients living in Kraków or its administrative region, who were diagnosed with GEP-NEN between 2002 and 2011., Results: The mean follow-up period was 4.9 ±2.8 years. The most frequent primary site of the tumor was the small intestine (n = 25; 20%), followed by pancreas (n = 23; 19%), rectum (n = 23; 19%), stomach (n = 21; 17%), appendix (n = 19; 16%), and colon (n = 11; 9%). There were 84 tumors classified as NEN G1; 31, as NEN G2; 5, as neuroendocrine carcinoma; and 1, as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. Most well-differentiated GEP-NENs (n = 57; 57%) were diagnosed at stage I according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer / Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) classification; 77% of NEN G1 (n = 64) were diagnosed at stage I, but the majority of NEN G2—at stage IV (n = 18; 58%). Metastases at diagnosis were found in 38 patients (34%). In 90% of the cases (n = 101), tumors were hormonally nonfunctional. The overall 5-year survival was 85%. In the univariate analysis, NEN G2 (P = 0.003), higher stage according to the AJCC/UICC classification (P <0.001), and metastases at diagnosis (P <0.001) were associated with poorer prognosis. In standardized multivariate models, higher stage (P = 0.02) and metastases at diagnosis (P = 0.02) were independent risk factors for death., Conclusions: The most important factors affecting survival of patients with GEP-NENs are tumor stage and the presence of metastases at diagnosis. The analysis of single-center data improves identification of patients with poorer prognosis requiring a more aggressive approach.

Introduction: There is an ongoing search for markers of pituitary tumor proliferation and progression that could facilitate further treatment and patient monitoring., Objectives: We studied topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα) expression in different types of pituitary adenomas to evaluate its prognostic value., Patients and Methods: In a retrospective study of 60 patients (mean age, 46.7 ±17.6 y) who underwent pituitary tumor surgery, expression of topo IIα was assessed by immunohistochemistry and compared with histopathological tumor features, clinical symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging, and postoperative tumor recurrence or progression., Results: Expression of topo IIα was observed in 44 of 60 pituitary adenomas (73%). The highest topo IIα index was observed in adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting tumors (median, 1.13% [0.37-1.21]), followed by silent-ACTH tumors (0.94% [0.89-1.0]), and hormone immunonegative adenomas (0.8% [0.65-1.55]). There were no differences in topo IIα expression with respect to age or sex. Significant correlations were observed between the topo IIα index and tumor size, its invasiveness, abnormal ocular test results, and postoperative tumor recurrence. In patients with a topo IIα index exceeding 1%, we observed a 3.5-fold higher relative risk of tumor recurrence as compared with patients with a topo IIα index lower than 1% (95% confidence interval: 1.8-6.9; P <0.001). Patients with acromegaly who received somatostatin analogues before the surgery had a lower median topo IIα index compared with untreated patients (0%[0-0.22] vs. 0.71% [0.17-1.0]; P <0.05)., Conclusions: In our study group, a topo IIα index exceeding 1% was a prognostic factor for tumor recurrence or progression, especially in patients with hormonally inactive adenomas, which facilitates patient selection for intensive postoperative treatment. Use of somatostatin analogues in acromegaly inhibits topo IIα expression, providing molecular evidence for the effectiveness of these analogues.