Search

Background: It remains unknown whether the administration of a deep neuromuscular block (NMB) during bariatric surgery improves surgical conditions and patient outcome. The authors studied the effect of deep versus moderate NMB in laparoscopic bariatric surgery on surgical conditions and postoperative pain., Methods and Results: One hundred patients scheduled to undergo elective bariatric surgery were randomized to a deep NMB (post-tetanic-count 2-3) or a moderate NMB (train-of-four 1-2). The quality of the surgical field was scored using the Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale (L-SRS), a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (extremely poor conditions) to 5 (optimal conditions). Three surgeons scored the L-SRS at 10-min intervals during surgery; postoperative pain scores were obtained in the postanesthesia-care-unit (PACU) and on the ward. Mean (95% confidence interval) L-SRS scores in moderate NMB 4.2 (4.0-4.4) versus 4.8 (4.7-4.9) in deep NMB (p < 0.001). Moderate NMB resulted in 17% of scores at L-SRS scores of 1-3, while deep NMB resulted in 100% scores at the high end of the L-SRS (4-5). Deep NMB led to improved pain scores in the PACU (4.6 (4.2-4.9) versus 3.9 (3.6-4.4), p = 0.03) and reduced shoulder pain on the ward (1.8 (1.5-2.1) versus 1.3 (1.1-1.5), p = 0.03). A composite score of pain and opioid use in the PACU favoured deep NMB (p = 0.001)., Conclusions: In bariatric surgery, deep relaxation has advantages for surgeon and patient. Compared to moderate NMB, deep NMB produced stable and improved surgical conditions with less postoperative pain., Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Albert Dahan, Chris Martini and Martijn Boon received speaker fees and/or consultancy fees from MSD Nederland.

Background: Prevalence of psychological distress (i.e. depressive and anxiety symptoms) in medically ill patients is high. Research in the general population shows a higher prevalence of psychological distress among immigrants compared to natives. Our aim was to examine the prevalence of psychological distress in the hospital setting comparing immigrant and native Dutch patients and first and second generation immigrant patients., Methods: Prevalence of psychological distress was assessed using the extended Kessler-10 (EK-10) in 904 patients in a Dutch general teaching hospital. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios to determine differences between native and immigrant patients and first and second generation immigrants in the prevalence of psychological distress. We adjusted for demographic and social variables, socio-economic status, physical quality of life, history of psychiatric disease and health care use., Results: Of 904 patients, 585 were native Dutch patients and 319 were immigrant patients. The prevalence of psychological distress in native compared to immigrant patients was 54% and 66% respectively, with especially high prevalences among Turkish and Moroccan immigrant patients. The crude OR for prevalence of psychological distress for immigrant patients versus native patients was 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.2) and for first versus second generation immigrant patients 2.1 (95% CI 1.2-3.5). After full adjustment ORs were 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.3) and 2.2 (95% CI 1.2-4.1) respectively., Conclusion: Immigrant patients and first generation immigrant patients were more likely to have psychological distress compared to native patients and second generation immigrant patients respectively. We found a particularly high prevalence of psychological distress in Turkish and Moroccan immigrants.