1. Directly observed therapy at opioid substitution facilities using sofosbuvir/velpatasvir results in excellent SVR12 rates in PWIDs at high risk for non-adherence to DAA therapy.
- Author
-
Schmidbauer C, Schwarz M, Schütz A, Schubert R, Schwanke C, Gutic E, Pirker R, Lang T, Reiberger T, Haltmayer H, and Gschwantler M
- Subjects
- Adult, Drug Therapy, Combination methods, Female, Hepacivirus drug effects, Hepatitis C, Chronic drug therapy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sustained Virologic Response, Analgesics, Opioid therapeutic use, Antiviral Agents therapeutic use, Carbamates therapeutic use, Directly Observed Therapy drug effects, Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings therapeutic use, Sofosbuvir therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background & Aims: We evaluated the effectiveness of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) in difficult-to-treat PWIDs with presumed high risk for non-adherence to antiviral therapy using an innovative concept involving their opioid agonist therapy (OAT) facility., Methods: N = 221 patients (m/f: 168/53; median age: 44.7 years (IQR 16.9); HCV-genotype 3: 45.2%; cirrhosis: 33.9%) treated with SOF/VEL were included. PWIDs at high risk for non-adherence to DAA therapy (n = 122) received HCV treatment alongside OAT under the supervision of medical staff ("directly observed therapy", DOT). These patients were compared to patients with presumed excellent drug compliance, who were treated in a "standard setting" (SS) of SOF/VEL prescription at a tertiary care center (n = 99)., Results: DOT-patients (n = 122/221; 55.2%) were younger than SS-patients (median age: 41.3 vs. 53.0 years), all had psychiatric comorbidities and most had a poor socioeconomic status. 83/122 (68.0%) reported ongoing intravenous drug use. Within the DOT-group, SVR12 was achieved in 99.1% (95% CI: 95.0-100; n = 109/110) with one patient experiencing treatment failure, while n = 12/122 (9.8%) patients were excluded due to loss of follow-up (FU). 5 patients showed HCV reinfection after achieving SVR12. SS-patients achieved SVR in 96.6% (95% CI: 90.3-99.3%; n = 84/87) after exclusion of 10/99 (10.1%) patients who were lost to FU and 2 patients who died prior to SVR12 due to reasons not related to DAA therapy., Conclusions: SOF/VEL given as DOT along with OAT in PWIDs at high risk of non-adherence to antiviral therapy including those with ongoing intravenous drug use resulted in excellent SVR rates similar to patients with presumed "excellent compliance" under standard drug intake., Competing Interests: C. Schmidbauer (schmidbauer.c@gmail.com): received travel support from Gilead, Abbvie and Gebro; and speaking honoraria from Abbvie. M. Schwarz (michael.schwarz@wienkav.at): received travel support from MSD, Sandoz, BMS and Abbvie; and speaking honoraria from BMS. A. Schütz (angelika.schuetz@suchthilfe.at): is employed by Suchthilfe Wien gGmbH and has no conflicts of interest. R. Schubert (raphael.schubert@outlook.at): is employed by Suchthilfe Wien gGmbH and received travel support from Gilead. C. Schwanke (cornelia.schwanke@suchthilfe.at): is employed by Suchthilfe Wien gGmbH and has no conflicts of interest. E. Gutic (enisa.gutic@extern.wienkav.at): received travel support from Gilead and Abbvie. R. Pirker (roxana.pirker@aon.at): no conflicts of interest. T. Lang (tobiaslang1904@gmail.com): no conflicts of interest. T. Reiberger (thomas.reiberger@meduniwien.ac.at): received grant support from Abbvie, Boehringer- Ingelheim, Gilead, MSD, Philips Healthcare, Gore; speaking honoraria from Abbvie, Gilead, Gore, Intercept, Roche, MSD; consulting/advisory board fees from Abbvie, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, Siemens; and travel support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead and Roche. H. Haltmayer (hans.haltmayer@suchthilfe.at): is employed by Suchthilfe Wien gGmbH and has no conflicts of interest. M. Gschwantler (michael.gschwantler@wienkav.at): received grants from Abbvie, Gilead, MSD; speaking honoraria from Abbvie, Gilead, MSD, Janssen, Roche, Intercept; consulting/advisory board fees from Abbvie, Gilead, MSD, Janssen, Roche, Intercept. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF