1. Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer, the FIB-4 index, and a combination of the two as predictors of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
- Author
-
Ito Kiyoaki, Yoshio Sumida, Yukiomi Nakade, Akinori Okumura, Sayaka Nishimura, Mayu Ibusuki, Rena Kitano, Kazumasa Sakamoto, Satoshi Kimoto, Tadahisa Inoue, Yuji Kobayashi, Yoshitaka Fukuzawa, and Masashi Yoneda
- Subjects
Liver Cirrhosis ,Multidisciplinary ,Glycosylation ,Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ,Biopsy ,Humans ,Fibrosis ,Biomarkers - Abstract
Approximately 10% non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cases progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver biopsy, the gold standard for diagnosing NASH and associated liver fibrosis, is invasive with a risk of life-threatening complications. Therefore, reliable non-invasive biomarkers for predicting NASH are required to prevent unnecessary liver biopsies. We evaluated the performance of two non-invasive fibrosis markers, Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) and the FIB-4 index for predicting the fibrosis staging, NAFLD activity scoring (NAS) index, and NASH. We also analyzed the correlation between the two markers. The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values of the FIB-4 index, M2BPGi, and a combination of both markers for NASH diagnosis were evaluated. The M2BPGi and FIB-4 index showed a good performance in diagnosing NASH, the fibrosis stage, and the NAS index in NAFLD patients. While both markers were well-correlated with each other in most cases, no correlation was found in some patients. Compared with the FIB-4 index or the M2BPGi alone, a combination of the two showed a higher specificity, PPV, and accuracy for NASH diagnosis. The M2BPGi and the FIB-4 index are easily accessible and reliable liver fibrosis markers. Diseases other than liver disease may cause dissociation between the two markers, causing failure to predict NASH. However, the combination of both markers can compensate for their disadvantages. Because the PPV of the combination was relatively high, patients who test positive for both markers should undergo liver biopsy for NASH diagnosis.
- Published
- 2022