Search

Neonatal sepsis is a serious public health problem; however, there is substantial heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and reported in research evaluating the effectiveness of the treatments. Therefore, we aim to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments for neonatal sepsis. Since a systematic review of key outcomes from randomised trials of therapeutic interventions in neonatal sepsis was published recently, we will complement this with a qualitative systematic review of the key outcomes of neonatal sepsis identified by parents, other family members, parent representatives, healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers. We will interpret the outcomes of both studies using a previously established framework. Stakeholders across three different groups i.e., (1) researchers, (2) healthcare providers, and (3) patients' parents/family members and parent representatives will rate the importance of the outcomes in an online Real-Time Delphi Survey. Afterwards, consensus meetings will be held to agree on the final COS through online discussions with key stakeholders. This COS is expected to minimize outcome heterogeneity in measurements and publications, improve comparability and synthesis, and decrease research waste., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Taneri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Introduction: The decision to delivery interval is a key indicator of the quality of obstetric care. This study assessed the decision to delivery interval for emergency cesarean sections and factors associated with delay., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study between October 2022 and December 2022 in the labor ward at Mbale regional referral hospital. Our primary outcome variable was the decision to delivery interval defined as the time interval in minutes from the decision to perform the emergency caesarean section to delivery of the baby. We used an observer checklist and interviewer administered questionnaire to collect data. Stata version 14.0 (StataCorp; College Station, TX, USA) was used to analyze the data., Results: We enrolled 352 participants; the mean age was 25.9 years and standard deviation (SD) ±5.9 years. The median (interquartile range) decision to delivery interval was 110 minutes (80 to 145). Only 7/352 (2.0%) participants had a decision to delivery time interval of ≤30 minutes. More than three quarters 281 /352 (79.8%) had a decision to delivery interval of greater than 75 minutes. Emergency cesarean section done by intern doctors compared to specialists [Adjusted Prevalence Ratio (aPR): 1.26; 95% CI: (1.09-1.45)] was associated with a prolonged decision to delivery interval., Conclusion: The average decision to delivery interval was almost 2 hours. Delays were mostly due to health system challenges. We recommend routine monitoring of decision to delivery interval as an indicator of the quality of obstetric care., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Apako et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)