1. Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE)
- Author
-
Jim van Os, Cécile Henquet, Marloes Vleeschouwer, Willemijn A. van Gastel, C. D. Schubart, Inez Myin-Germeys, Marco P. Boks, Manon H.J. Hillegers, Eske M. Derks, Psychiatrie & Neuropsychologie, RS: MHeNs - R2 - Mental Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam Public Health, and Adult Psychiatry
- Subjects
Questionnaires ,Male ,Health Screening ,Psychometrics ,Non-Clinical Medicine ,Social and Behavioral Sciences ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Statistics ,Psychology ,Child ,Psychiatry ,Multidisciplinary ,Middle Aged ,Test (assessment) ,Mental Health ,Medicine ,Female ,Metric (unit) ,Public Health ,Research Article ,Test Evaluation ,Adult ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Science ,education ,Sample (statistics) ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Young Adult ,Diagnostic Medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Psychological testing ,Measurement invariance ,Statistical Methods ,Health Care Quality ,Pencil (mathematics) ,Internet ,Psychological Tests ,business.industry ,68–95–99.7 rule ,Reproducibility of Results ,Communication in Health Care ,Psychotic Disorders ,business ,Mathematics - Abstract
BackgroundThe psychometric properties of an online test are not necessarily identical to its paper and pencil original. The aim of this study is to test whether the factor structure of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is measurement invariant with respect to online vs. paper and pencil assessment.MethodThe factor structure of CAPE items assessed by paper and pencil (N = 796) was compared with the factor structure of CAPE items assessed by the Internet (N = 21,590) using formal tests for Measurement Invariance (MI). The effect size was calculated by estimating the Signed Item Difference in the Sample (SIDS) index and the Signed Test Difference in the Sample (STDS) for a hypothetical subject who scores 2 standard deviations above average on the latent dimensions.ResultsThe more restricted Metric Invariance model showed a significantly worse fit compared to the less restricted Configural Invariance model (χ(2)(23) = 152.75, pConclusionsOur findings did not support measurement invariance with respect to assessment method. Because of the small effect sizes, the measurement differences between the online assessed CAPE and its paper and pencil original can be neglected without major consequences for research purposes. However, a person with a high vulnerability for psychotic symptoms would score 4.80 points lower on the total scale if the CAPE is assessed online compared to paper and pencil assessment. Therefore, for clinical purposes, one should be cautious with online assessment of the CAPE.
- Published
- 2014