Search

Rationale Implicit racial bias affects many human interactions including patient-physician encounters. Its impact, however, varies between studies. We assessed the effects of physician implicit, racial bias on their management of cancer-related pain using a randomized field experiment. Methods We conducted an analysis of a randomized field experiment between 2012 and 2016 with 96 primary care physicians and oncologists using unannounced, Black and White standardized patients (SPs)who reported uncontrolled bone pain from metastatic lung cancer. We assessed implicit bias using a pain-adaptation of the race Implicit Association Test. We assessed clinical care by reviewing medical records and prescriptions, and we assessed communication from coded transcripts and covert audiotapes of the unannounced standardized patient office visits. We assessed effects of interactions of physicians’ implicit bias and SP race with clinical care and communication outcomes. We conducted a slopes analysis to examine the nature of significant interactions. Results As hypothesized, physicians with greater implicit bias provided lower quality care to Black SPs, including fewer renewals for an indicated opioid prescription and less patient-centered pain communication, but similar routine pain assessment. In contrast to our other hypotheses, physician implicit bias did not interact with SP race for prognostic communication or verbal dominance. Analysis of the slopes for the cross-over interactions showed that greater physician bias was manifested by more frequent opioid prescribing and greater discussion of pain for White SPs and slightly less frequent prescribing and pain talk for Black SPs with the opposite effect among physicians with lower implicit bias. Findings are limited by use of an unvalidated, pain-adapted IAT. Conclusion Using SP methodology, physicians’ implicit bias was associated with clinically meaningful, racial differences in management of uncontrolled pain related to metastatic lung cancer. There is favorable treatment of White or Black SPs, depending on the level of implicit bias.

Despite improvements in early detection and therapeutic interventions, the mortality rate for Black breast cancer patients is still significantly higher than that of White breast cancer patients. This study seeks to understand differences in the patient experience that lead to this disparity. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the breast cancer treatment process and patient experiences. This study collected health services and timeline data from medical records. Based on these two data sources, the patient's journey in breast cancer treatment was mapped and a thematic analysis was conducted to identify challenges and barriers in the process. The cancer care continuum consists of four stages-diagnosis, surgery, chemotherapy/radiation, and follow-up care. The themes contributing to patient experiences and challenges were identified and compared in each stage for both Black and White patients. Both Black and White participants faced challenges related to financial constraints, treatment changes, lack of autonomy, and insufficient emotional support. However, Black participants additionally faced significant barriers in terms of cultural concordance, effective patient-provider communication, and delay in diagnosis. This study highlights the importance of incorporating effective provider-patient communication, navigation, and emotional support, especially for Black breast cancer patients throughout the cancer care continuum to address healthcare disparities.