1. Ten Simple Rules for writing algorithmic bioinformatics conference papers
- Author
-
Paul Medvedev
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Computer and Information Sciences ,Computer science ,QH301-705.5 ,Bioinformatics ,Writing ,Gene Identification and Analysis ,Genetic Networks ,Research and Analysis Methods ,Field (computer science) ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,Database and Informatics Methods ,Clustering Algorithms ,0302 clinical medicine ,Computer software ,Genetics ,Humans ,Prototypes ,Biology (General) ,Molecular Biology ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Simple (philosophy) ,Publishing ,Ecology ,Information Dissemination ,Software Tools ,Applied Mathematics ,Simulation and Modeling ,Computational Biology ,Software Engineering ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Congresses as Topic ,030104 developmental biology ,Editorial ,Technology Development ,Computational Theory and Mathematics ,Modeling and Simulation ,Physical Sciences ,Engineering and Technology ,Sequence Analysis ,Sequence Alignment ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Algorithms ,Mathematics ,Network Analysis - Abstract
Author summary Conferences are great venues for disseminating algorithmic bioinformatics results, but they unfortunately do not offer an opportunity to make major revisions in the way that journals do. As a result, it is not possible for authors to fix mistakes that might be easily correctable but nevertheless can cause the paper to be rejected. As a reviewer, I wish that I had the opportunity to tell the authors, “Hey, you forgot to do this really important thing, without which it is hard to accept the paper, but if you could go back and fix it, you might have a great paper for the conference.” This lack of a back and forth can be especially problematic for first-time submitters or those from outside the field, e.g., biologists. In this article, I outline Ten Simple Rules to follow when writing an algorithmic bioinformatics conference paper to avoid having it rejected.
- Published
- 2020