Search

Pharmacological inhibition of the platelet ADP-receptor P2Y12 is a cornerstone in the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Thienopyridines such as clopidogrel and prasugrel exert their antithrombotic effect by means of active metabolites that irreversibly inhibit P2Y12. Due to the short half-life of these metabolites, a subpopulation of ADP-responsive platelets will form in between dosing. With increased platelet turnover rate or poor patient compliance, the fraction of ADP-responsive platelets will increase, potentially increasing the risk for new thrombotic events. In contrast, the reversible P2Y12 inhibition produced by direct-acting ADP blockers such as ticagrelor and cangrelor inhibit the entire platelet population. In this study, we evaluated the impact of these pharmacological differences on thrombus formation in an ex vivo flow chamber model. A customized image analysis pipeline was used for automatized, large-scale identification and tracking of single platelets incorporated into the thrombus, enabling quantitative analysis of the relative contribution of inhibited and uninhibited platelets to thrombus growth and consolidation. Comparative experiments were conducted using the irreversible and reversible P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel active metabolite (PAM) and ticagrelor, respectively. Our results show that PAM inhibited thrombus platelet recruitment more gradually than ticagrelor, with a slower onset of inhibition. Further, we show that the presence of a small fraction (<10%) of uninhibited platelets did not abrogate the antithrombotic effect of PAM to any significant extent. Finally, we demonstrate a gradual enrichment of inhibited platelets in the thrombus shell due to selective recruitment of inhibited platelets to the thrombus periphery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple myeloma (MM) and its precursor states, smoldering myeloma (SM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) are associated with increased incidence of thrombosis, however the cause of this is unknown. Lenalidomide treatment of MM substantially improves patient survival, although significantly increases thrombotic risk by an unknown mechanism. This pilot study aimed to establish the impact of MM and its treatment with Lenalidomide on platelet function. We analyzed platelet function in MGUS, SM and MM compared to healthy controls. We report an increase in platelet reactivity in MGUS, SM, and MM where increases in fibrinogen binding, P-selectin exposure, altered receptor expression, elevated levels of aggregation and enhanced sensitivity to agonist stimulation were observed. We also demonstrate an increase in patient platelet reactivity post Lenalidomide treatment compared to pre-treatment. We show Lenalidomide treatment of platelets ex vivo increased reactivity that was associated with formation of larger thrombi at arterial shear rates but not venous shear rates. This study demonstrates a clear increase in platelet reactivity and prothrombotic potential in patients with MGUS, SM and MM which is elevated further upon treatment with Lenalidomide. Our observations suggest that more detailed studies are warranted to determine mechanisms of thrombotic complications to enable the development of new preventative strategies that specifically target platelets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platelet inhibition is the main treatment strategy to prevent atherothrombotic complications after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) persists in some patients due to poor response to treatment and is associated with ischemic risk. Tubulin acetylation has been pointed out as a hallmark of stable microtubules responsible for the discoid shape of resting platelets. However, the impact of antiplatelet treatments on this posttranslational modification has never been studied. This study investigated whether tubulin acetylation differs according to antiplatelet therapy and on-treatment platelet reactivity. Platelets were isolated from arterial blood samples of 240 patients admitted for coronary angiography, and levels of a-tubulin acetylation on lysine 40 (a-tubulin K40 acetylation) were assessed by western blot. We show that platelet a-tubulin K40 acetylation was significantly increased in DAPT-treated patients. In addition, the proportion of patients with high levels of a-tubulin K40 acetylation was drastically reduced among DAPT-treated patients with HPR. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that DAPT resulting in adequate platelet inhibition was strongly associated with elevated a-tubulin K40 acetylation. In conclusion, our study highlights the role of elevated platelet a-tubulin K40 acetylation as a marker of platelet inhibition in response to DAPT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clopidogrel combined with aspirin is widely used in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, while some patients exhibit high platelet activity when receiving the combined treatment. Current environmental and genetic factors could only explain part of the variability in clopidogrel efficacy. Human platelets harbor abundant miRNAs which might affect clopidogrel efficacy by regulating the expression of key proteins in the clopidogrel antiplatelet signaling pathway. This study aimed to investigate the association between platelet miRNA levels and clopidogrel efficacy. Here we recruited 508 CAD patients who underwent clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy and determined the platelet reactivity index (PRI) to evaluate antiplatelet reactivity responses to clopidogrel. Subsequently, 22 patients with extreme clopidogrel response were selected for platelet small RNA sequencing. Another 41 CAD patients taking clopidogrel were collected to verify the differentially expressed candidate miRNAs. We found the metabolic types of the CYP2C19 enzyme (based on CYP2C19 * 2 and * 3 polymorphisms) could significantly affect the PRI of CAD patients with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Chinese. A total of 43 miRNAs were differentially expressed in the platelets from the 22 extreme clopidogrel response samples, and 109 miRNAs were differentially expressed in the 13 CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers with extreme clopidogrel response. Platelet miR-199a-5p levels were correlated negatively with PRI after clopidogrel therapy. Studies in cultured cells revealed that miR-199a-5p inhibited the expression of VASP, a key effector protein downstream of the P2Y12 receptor. In conclusion, we found the expression of VASP could be inhibited by miR-199a-5p, and decreased platelet miR-199a-5p was associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in CAD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pharmacological inhibition of the platelet ADP-receptor P2Y12 is a cornerstone in the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Thienopyridines such as clopidogrel and prasugrel exert their antithrombotic effect by means of active metabolites that irreversibly inhibit P2Y12. Due to the short half-life of these metabolites, a subpopulation of ADP-responsive platelets will form in between dosing. With increased platelet turnover rate or poor patient compliance, the fraction of ADP-responsive platelets will increase, potentially increasing the risk for new thrombotic events. In contrast, the reversible P2Y12 inhibition produced by direct-acting ADP blockers such as ticagrelor and cangrelor inhibit the entire platelet population. In this study, we evaluated the impact of these pharmacological differences on thrombus formation in an ex vivo flow chamber model. A customized image analysis pipeline was used for automatized, large-scale identification and tracking of single platelets incorporated into the thrombus, enabling quantitative analysis of the relative contribution of inhibited and uninhibited platelets to thrombus growth and consolidation. Comparative experiments were conducted using the irreversible and reversible P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel active metabolite (PAM) and ticagrelor, respectively. Our results show that PAM inhibited thrombus platelet recruitment more gradually than ticagrelor, with a slower onset of inhibition. Further, we show that the presence of a small fraction (

BMS-986141 is a novel, oral, protease-activated, receptor 4 (PAR4)-antagonist that exhibited robust antithrombotic activity and low bleeding risk in preclinical studies. The pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and tolerability profiles of BMS-986141 in healthy participants were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose (SAD; N = 60) study; a multiple-ascending-dose (MAD; N = 32) study; and a Japanese MAD (JMAD; N = 32) study. Exposure was dose-proportional for BMS-986141 2.5 mg and 150 mg; maximum concentrations were 17.6 ng/mL and 958 ng/mL; and areas under the curve (AUC) to infinity were 183 h* × ng/mL and 9207 h* × ng/mL, respectively. Mean half-life ranged from 33.7 to 44.7 hours across dose panels. The accumulation index following once-daily administration for 7 days suggested a 1.3- to 2-fold AUC increase at steady state. In the SAD study, BMS-986141 75 and 150 mg produced ≥80% inhibition of 25–100 µM PAR4 agonist peptide (AP)-induced platelet aggregation, without affecting PAR1-AP-induced platelet aggregation, through ≥24 hours postdose. In the MAD and JMAD studies, BMS-986141 doses ≥10 mg completely inhibited 12.5 μM and 25 μM PAR4-AP-induced platelet aggregation through 24 hours. This study found BMS-986141 was safe and well tolerated, with dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and concentration-dependent pharmacodynamics in healthy participants over a wide dose range. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02341638. Why was the study done? Antiplatelet therapies have shortcomings that limit their clinical utility, and there is an unmet need for a new, safe, and effective antiplatelet agent with reduced bleeding risk. PAR4 antagonists are a promising novel class of antiplatelet drugs due to late-stage inhibition of thrombus growth with minimal effects on platelet-driven hemostasis. BMS-986141 is a novel, potent, orally bioavailable, small-molecule antagonist specific for PAR4. What is new? BMS-986141 is safe and well tolerated, with dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and concentration-dependent pharmacodynamics in healthy participants over a wide dose range. BMS-986141 has robust antithrombotic activity and low bleeding risk. What is the impact? BMS-986141 has the potential to improve the benefit–risk of antiplatelet therapy in patients with atherothrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clopidogrel combined with aspirin is widely used in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, while some patients exhibit high platelet activity when receiving the combined treatment. Current environmental and genetic factors could only explain part of the variability in clopidogrel efficacy. Human platelets harbor abundant miRNAs which might affect clopidogrel efficacy by regulating the expression of key proteins in the clopidogrel antiplatelet signaling pathway. This study aimed to investigate the association between platelet miRNA levels and clopidogrel efficacy. Here we recruited 508 CAD patients who underwent clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy and determined the platelet reactivity index (PRI) to evaluate antiplatelet reactivity responses to clopidogrel. Subsequently, 22 patients with extreme clopidogrel response were selected for platelet small RNA sequencing. Another 41 CAD patients taking clopidogrel were collected to verify the differentially expressed candidate miRNAs. We found the metabolic types of the CYP2C19 enzyme (based on CYP2C19 * 2 and * 3 polymorphisms) could significantly affect the PRI of CAD patients with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Chinese. A total of 43 miRNAs were differentially expressed in the platelets from the 22 extreme clopidogrel response samples, and 109 miRNAs were differentially expressed in the 13 CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers with extreme clopidogrel response. Platelet miR-199a-5p levels were correlated negatively with PRI after clopidogrel therapy. Studies in cultured cells revealed that miR-199a-5p inhibited the expression of VASP, a key effector protein downstream of the P2Y12 receptor. In conclusion, we found the expression of VASP could be inhibited by miR-199a-5p, and decreased platelet miR-199a-5p was associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in CAD patients. What is the context? ● Clopidogrel combined with aspirin is widely used in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, while some patients exhibit high platelet activity when receiving the combined treatment. ● Current environmental and genetic factors could only explain part of the variability in clopidogrel efficacy. ● Human platelets harbor abundant miRNAs which might affect clopidogrel efficacy by regulating the expression of key proteins in the clopidogrel antiplatelet signaling pathway. What is new? ● We found that decreased platelet miR-199a-5p level was associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity. ● Overexpression of miR-199a-5p significantly down-regulated the expression of VASP protein in cultured cells. What is the impact? ● The current study provided new insights into the exploration of interindividual variability in clopidogrel response from the perspective of miR-199a-5p and VASP interaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platelet inhibition is the main treatment strategy to prevent atherothrombotic complications after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) persists in some patients due to poor response to treatment and is associated with ischemic risk. Tubulin acetylation has been pointed out as a hallmark of stable microtubules responsible for the discoid shape of resting platelets. However, the impact of antiplatelet treatments on this post-translational modification has never been studied. This study investigated whether tubulin acetylation differs according to antiplatelet therapy and on-treatment platelet reactivity. Platelets were isolated from arterial blood samples of 240 patients admitted for coronary angiography, and levels of α-tubulin acetylation on lysine 40 (α-tubulin K40 acetylation) were assessed by western blot. We show that platelet α-tubulin K40 acetylation was significantly increased in DAPT-treated patients. In addition, the proportion of patients with high levels of α-tubulin K40 acetylation was drastically reduced among DAPT-treated patients with HPR. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that DAPT resulting in adequate platelet inhibition was strongly associated with elevated α-tubulin K40 acetylation. In conclusion, our study highlights the role of elevated platelet α-tubulin K40 acetylation as a marker of platelet inhibition in response to DAPT. Clinical trial registration: - NCT03034148. What is the context? High on-treatment platelet reactivity due to dual antiplatelet therapy poor response is associated with thrombotic risk. Acetylation of α-tubulin K40 plays a crucial role in regulating platelet shape. High α-tubulin K40 acetylation is a hallmark of stable microtubules. What is new? α-tubulin K40 acetylation is increased in platelets from dual antiplatelet therapy-treated patients. High platelet α-tubulin K40 acetylation is mainly observed in clopidogrel-responsive patients. What is the impact? Elevated acetylated K40 α-tubulin could be used as a readout of adequate platelet inhibition in response to dual antiplatelet therapy. High α-tubulin K40 acetylation could contribute to maintaining the resting morphology of circulating platelets and therefore modify their capacity to be involved in thrombotic events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increasing clinical trials demonstrated that the discontinuation of aspirin while maintaining a P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy could decrease the risk of bleeding without losing the antithrombotic effect. However, no data are available on the platelet reactivity of patients undergoing ticagrelor monotherapy vs. clopidogrel. Therefore, we performed this study to observe the efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy vs. clopidogrel in Chinese patients with chronic coronary syndrome. This randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial enrolled 50 patients who were administered with ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily for 2 weeks) or clopidogrel (75 mg once daily for 2 weeks). Followed by a 2-week washout period, the two groups of patients underwent a crossover trial. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and thromboelastography (TEG) assays were used to test platelet reactivity. The platelet aggregation rate (PAgR) of ADP and AA was significantly lower with ticagrelor than clopidogrel (PAgR of ADP, 27.30% (7.30%-42.635%) vs. 35.55% (12.03%-69.25%), P =.0254; PAgR of AA, 77.80% (21.60%-86.43%) vs. 83.10% (67.13%-87.20%), P =.0400). There was no significant difference in PAgR of collagen and epinephrine between the two groups. The TEG assay showed that ADP and AA, which induced the inhibition of platelet aggregation, were significantly higher in the ticagrelor group than those in the clopidogrel group [ADP%, 69.00% (59.68%–88.95%) vs. 60.55% (35.98%–78.35%), P =.0020; AA%, 53.65% (22.75%–79.28%) vs. 15.15% (5.75%–70.25%), P =.0127]. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on ADP was 2.17% with ticagrelor and 19.57% with clopidogrel. HTPR on AA was 50.00% with ticagrelor and 69.57% with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel caused the inhibition of ADP and AA-induced platelet aggregation. Moreover, ticagrelor monotherapy had a stronger inhibitory effect than clopidogrel monotherapy (except on collagen and epinephrine). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Crushed or chewed potent P2Y12 inhibitors are commonly used in the hope of bridging the gap of platelet inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of this alternative oral administration strategy by performing a meta-analysis of available randomized clinical trials (RCTs). PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science medical literature databases were searched for RCTs comparing crushed/chewed vs. integral administration of loading dose potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI with no language restrictions from inception to January 20th, 2021. The primary efficacy endpoints of high on treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) at 1 hour together with safety and additional clinical endpoints were evaluated by pooled odds ratio (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A total of 973 patents in six RCTs were eligible for analysis, while 876 patients present baseline and procedural characteristics. HPR and PRU at 1 hour were significantly reduced in the group receiving crushed/chewed P2Y12 inhibitors compared with integral tablets (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.49, P <.0001; MD −60.62, 95% CI −97.06 to −24.19, P =.001, respectively). Safety endpoints of major bleeding (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.73, P =.46) and any bleeding (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.64, P =.61), as well as additional clinical endpoints of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were not affected by the oral administration strategy. In STEMI patients undergoing pPCI, crushed or chewed administration of potent P2Y12 inhibitors are associated with enhanced early platelet inhibition and appear to be safe. The clinical profile transformed from this pharmacodynamic benefit need to be determined by further researches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Changes in circulating cell populations may promote ischemic events that occur soon after discontinuation of P2Y12-inhibition. The aim of the study was to track the course of thrombopoietic and erythropoietic cells in patients with coronary artery diseases (CAD) after planned and physician-driven cessation of chronic P2Y12-inhibition (clopidogrel 75 mg OD, or prasugrel 10 mg OD, or ticagrelor 90 mg BID). Cell fractions were determined in 62 patients at baseline (the last day of P2Y12-inhibitor intake), on day-10, day-30, and day-180 thereafter. Immature platelet fraction (IPF), immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), reticulocyte hemoglobin content (Ret-Hb) and red blood cell count (RBC) significantly increased from baseline to day-180 (IPF: p = .003; IRF: p = .013; Ret-Hb: p

Inflammation leads to atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We performed a prospective, observational study to assess association between the concentrations of inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein, hsCRP; high sensitivity interleukin6, hsIL-6; soluble CD40 ligand, sCD40 L) and platelet reactivity in 338 patients with ACS treated with ticagrelor and prasugrel. We also assessed whether hsCRP, hsIL-6, and sCD40 L are associated with standard inflammatory markers (white blood cell [WBC] and fibrinogen), and whether they differ according to patient diabetic status and pre-treatment with statins. Concentrations of hsCRP and concentrations of hsIL-6 and sCD40 L were assessed using turbidimetric assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Platelet reactivity was measured using multiple electrode aggregometry. There was only a weak inverse correlation between hsIL-6 and platelet reactivity (r≤-0.125). In contrast, concentration of hsIL6 and hsCRP positively correlated with WBC and fibrinogen (r ≥ 0.199). Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) was associated with higher concentration of hsIL-6 (p = .014), whereas pre-treatment with statins – with lower concentration of hsIL-6 (p = .035). In conclusion, inflammatory state does not affect the antiplatelet efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in the acute phase of ACS, confirming the safety and efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with a high inflammatory burden.

Changes in circulating cell populations may promote ischemic events that occur soon after discontinuation of P2Y12-inhibition. The aim of the study was to track the course of thrombopoietic and erythropoietic cells in patients with coronary artery diseases (CAD) after planned and physician-driven cessation of chronic P2Y12-inhibition (clopidogrel 75 mg OD, or prasugrel 10 mg OD, or ticagrelor 90 mg BID). Cell fractions were determined in 62 patients at baseline (the last day of P2Y12-inhibitor intake), on day-10, day-30, and day-180 thereafter. Immature platelet fraction (IPF), immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), reticulocyte hemoglobin content (Ret-Hb) and red blood cell count (RBC) significantly increased from baseline to day-180 (IPF: p =.003; IRF: p =.013; Ret-Hb: p <.001; RBC: p =.044). Platelet count, leucocyte count and immature granulocyte fraction did not change over time (p =.561, p =.869, and p =.161, respectively). Fibrinogen levels significantly declined over time (p =.011), thrombopoietin levels increased in a non-significant manner (p =.379). We did not observe any significant interaction with choice of P2Y12-inhibitor, therefore suggesting a drug class-effect. Our data shows, that discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with raised thrombopoietic and erythropoietic activity in the bone marrow, without significant upregulation of thrombopoietin. This provides further evidence for a direct stimulation of precursor cells by P2Y12-inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The most effective antiplatelet treatments for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) alleles undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still debating and conflicting. It was aimed to compare the efficacy and safety endpoints for these patients treated with alternative P2Y12 receptor blockers (e.g. prasugrel or ticagrelor) against clopidogrel. Literature was searched in PubMed, Cochrane library, Synapse and 1000 Genomes databases following PRISMA guidelines for identifying relevant studies. Aggregated risk was estimated by RevMan software using either fixed/random-effects models where P values<0.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant. Nine studies comprising 16,132 ACS patients undergoing PCI were included in this analysis in which 2,746 and 2,640 patients were in the CYP2C19 LoF clopidogrel and alternatives treatment group, respectively. It was demonstrated that patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of MACEs (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.45–0.76; P<0.0001) as compared to patients with clopidogrel where both groups carrying CYP2C19 LoF alleles. Subgroup analysis showed that prasugrel or ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death (RR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25–0.74; P=0.002) and MI (RR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44–0.81; P=0.0008) while other clinical outcomes were not found statistically significant between these two groups; stroke (RR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.43–1.38; P =0.39), stent thrombosis (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.38–1.18; P =0.17), unstable angina (RR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.13–2.33; P =0.42), revascularisation (RR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.28–2.24; P=0.66). Bleeding events were not found significantly different between these groups (RR 1.06; 95% CI: 0.88–1.28; P=0.55). Considering efficacy and safety, alternative antiplatelets (e.g. prasugrel or ticagrelor) may be regarded as better treatment option as compared to clopidogrel for ACS patients undergoing PCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platelet function tests (PFT), such as the Multiple Electrode Analyzer (Multiplate) and VerifyNow, show little concordance in patients using antiplatelet drugs. A major difference between these tests is the use of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) to inhibit P2Y1-platelet-receptor activation in VerifyNow and is proposed to be of influence in the discrepancy between these tests. We aimed to investigate whether the presence of PGE1 could provide an explanation for the moderate correlation and concordance between Multiplate and VerifyNow by adding PGE1 to the Multiplate ADP assay, also known as the ADP-high sensitivity (ADP-HS) assay. We also aimed to investigate whether the difference in baseline platelet function as measured by the VerifyNow and Multiplate could (partly) explain the moderate correlation between the tests, by plotting ADP assay results against baseline function as measured by the corresponding device, which is expressed as the 'inhibitor percentage.' Fifty-one patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received dual antiplatelet therapy and were considered to have a high risk of ischemic or bleeding complications were included. The addition of 20 µl PGE1 in the Multiplate resulted in a significant reduction in Arbitrary Aggregation Units, but did not improve correlation with the VerifyNow. The correlation between VerifyNow and Multiplate inhibitor percentage was moderate. Based on these results, we concluded that neither PGE1 nor the calculation of the inhibitor percentage greatly influenced the correlation between PFTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inflammation leads to atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We performed a prospective, observational study to assess association between the concentrations of inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein, hsCRP; high sensitivity interleukin6, hsIL-6; soluble CD40 ligand, sCD40 L) and platelet reactivity in 338 patients with ACS treated with ticagrelor and prasugrel. We also assessed whether hsCRP, hsIL-6, and sCD40 L are associated with standard inflammatory markers (white blood cell [WBC] and fibrinogen), and whether they differ according to patient diabetic status and pre-treatment with statins. Concentrations of hsCRP and concentrations of hsIL-6 and sCD40 L were assessed using turbidimetric assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Platelet reactivity was measured using multiple electrode aggregometry. There was only a weak inverse correlation between hsIL-6 and platelet reactivity (r≤-0.125). In contrast, concentration of hsIL6 and hsCRP positively correlated with WBC and fibrinogen (r ≥ 0.199). Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) was associated with higher concentration of hsIL-6 (p =.014), whereas pre-treatment with statins – with lower concentration of hsIL-6 (p =.035). In conclusion, inflammatory state does not affect the antiplatelet efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in the acute phase of ACS, confirming the safety and efficacy of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with a high inflammatory burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Residual high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has emerged as a predictor of major ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), especially after an acute cardiovascular event. However, its determinants are still poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of the percentage of reticulated platelets on HTPR in patients on DAPT with ASA (100–160 mg) and prasugrel (10 mg). Platelet reactivity and the reticulated platelets fraction (immature platelets fraction [IPF]) were assessed at 30–90 days after an acute coronary syndrome. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HTPR was defined as ADP test > 417 AU × min. Our population is represented by 180 ACS patients undergoing stent implantation, divided according to median values of IPF (

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is a mainstay of the prevention of stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the 2015 European guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), prasugrel (PRA) and ticagrelor (TICA) combined with aspirin are recommended as first-line therapy. Clopidogrel (CLO) is recommended as an alternative medication for patients with contradictions to these new drugs. This single-center study analyzed the platelet function of 809 ACS patients undergoing PCI and treatment with DAPT. The platelet response to ADP was determined using Multiplate® analyzer at a median of 3 days after PCI in 254 patients treated with PRA (loading dose [LD] 60 mg, 10 mg qd), 162 patients receiving TICA (LD 180 mg, D 90 mg bid), and 393 CLO-treated patients (LD 600 mg, 75 mg qd). An aggregation >468 arbitrary units (AU)*min was defined as “high on-treatment platelet reactivity” (HPR),

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are a global cause of mortality and morbidity that affect millions of lives worldwide. Following atherosclerotic plaque rupture, platelet activation and aggregation are the two major elements that initiate thrombus formation inside a coronary artery, which can obstruct blood flow and cause myocardial ischemia; ergo, antiplatelet therapy forms a major part of the treatment strategy for ACS. Patients with ACS routinely receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which consists of aspirin and a platelet P2Y12 inhibitor to both treat and prevent atherothrombosis. Use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors is now limited due to the risk of severe bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Thus, administration of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors is generally restricted to bail out thrombotic events associated with PCI. Furthermore, current antiplatelet medications mainly rely on thromboxane A2 and P2Y12 inhibition, which have broad-acting effects on platelets and are known to cause bleeding, which especially limits the long-term use of these agents. In addition, not all ACS patients treated with current antiplatelet treatments are protected from recurrence of arterial thrombosis, since many platelet mechanisms and activation pathways remain uninhibited by current antiplatelet therapy. Pharmacological antagonism of novel targets involved in platelet function could shape future antiplatelet therapies that could ultimately lead to more effective or safer therapeutic approaches. In this article, we focus on inhibitors of promising targets that have not yet been introduced into clinical practice, including inhibitors of GPVI, protease-activated receptor (PAR)-4, GPIb, 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtype 2A (5-HT2A), protein disulfide isomerase, P-selectin and phosphoinositide 3-kinase β. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cigarette smoking is an important cardiovascular risk factor, causing morbidity and mortality. There are many original studies on the impact of smoking, but its influence on platelet ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors lack consistency. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of already existing data/studies to further explore this issue. PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2018. Studies investigating the residual platelet reactivity categorized by smoking status and patients treated with platelet ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors qualified the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value measured by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, compared with different smoking status in ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors treatment groups. Secondary outcome was post-treatment with 5 μmol/L ADP-inhibition of platelet aggregation (ADP-IPA) measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). Of the 4954 citations retrieved, 12 studies involving 16 296 patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or stent deployment using platelet ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors were included for meta-analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that PRU values of current smokers were 25.70 lower than nonsmokers (95% CI −38.81 to −12.60, p = 0.0001), getting better effects of antiplatelet treatment. In the smoking extent subgroup analysis, patients smoking >10 cigarettes/day shown about 46.49 lower of PRU values than patients smoking <10 cigarettes/day (p < 0.00001). Racial subgroup analyses found that smokers had increased platelet inhibition in the Caucasian population. Further, pooled analysis of ADP-IPA values for 1658 patients from five studies showed a significantly lower residual platelet reactivity in current smokers compared to that in nonsmokers (MD = −4.19; 95% CI −6.55 to −1.83; p = 0.0005). This systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that smokers have increased platelet inhibition and lower aggregation in response to clopidogrel than nonsmokers. These residual platelet reactivity observations may help to explain differential clinical outcomes in smokers vs. nonsmokers in large scale clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Activated platelets contribute to thrombosis and inflammation by the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs) exposing P-selectin, phosphatidylserine (PS) and fibrinogen. P2Y12 receptor antagonists are routinely administered to inhibit platelet activation in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), being a combined antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory therapy. The more potent P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor improves cardiovascular outcome in patients after AMI compared to the less potent clopidogrel, suggesting that greater inhibition of platelet aggregation is associated with better prognosis. The effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on the release of EVs from platelets and other P2Y12-exposing cells is unknown. This study compares the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on (1) the concentrations of EVs from activated platelets (primary end point), (2) the concentrations of EVs exposing fibrinogen, exposing PS, from leukocytes and from endothelial cells (secondary end points) and (3) the procoagulant activity of plasma EVs (tertiary end points) in 60 consecutive AMI patients. After the percutaneous coronary intervention, patients will be randomized to antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor (study group) or clopidogrel (control group). Blood will be collected from patients at randomization, 48 hours after randomization and 6 months following the index hospitalization. In addition, 30 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers will be enrolled in the study to investigate the physiological concentrations and procoagulant activity of EVs using recently standardized protocols and EV-dedicated flow cytometry. Concentrations of EVs will be determined by flow cytometry. Procoagulant activity of EVs will be determined by fibrin generation test. The compliance and response to antiplatelet therapy will be assessed by impedance aggregometry. We expect that plasma from patients treated with ticagrelor (1) contains lower concentrations of EVs from activated platelets, exposing fibrinogen, exposing PS, from leukocytes and from endothelial cells and (2) has lower procoagulant activity, when compared to patients treated with clopidogrel. Antiplatelet therapy effect on EVs may identify a new mechanism of action of ticagrelor, as well as create a basis for future studies to investigate whether lower EV concentrations are associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients treated with P2Y12 antagonists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Three oral platelet P2Y12 inhibitors, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, are available for reducing the risk of cardiovascular death and stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to compare the efficacy of these antiplatelet drugs in contemporary practice. Data were collected for 10 793 consecutive ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography at Sheffield, UK (2009–2015). Since prasugrel use was mostly restricted to the STEMI subgroup, clopidogrel and ticagrelor were compared for all ACS patients, and all three agents were compared in the STEMI subgroup. Differences in outcomes were evaluated at 12 months by KM curves and log-rank test after adjustment for independent risk factors. Of 10 793 patients with ACS (36% STEMI), 43% (4653) received clopidogrel, 11% (1223) prasugrel and 46% (4917) ticagrelor, with aspirin for all. In the overall group, ticagrelor was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel (adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 0.82, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.71–0.96, p = 0.01). In the STEMI subgroup, both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with a lower mortality compared with clopidogrel (prasugrel vs. clopidogrel: adjHR 0.65, CI 0.48–0.89, p = 0.007; ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel: adjHR 0.70, CI 0.61–0.99, p = 0.05). Of the 7595 patients who underwent PCI, 78 (1.0%) had definite stent thrombosis by 12 months. Patients treated with ticagrelor had a lower incidence of definite stent thrombosis compared with clopidogrel (0.6% vs. 1.1%; adjHR 0.51, CI 0.29–0.89, p = 0.03). In the STEMI subgroup, there was no significant difference between the three groups (ticagrelor 1.0%, clopidogrel = 1.5%, prasugrel = 1.6%; p = 0.29). In conclusion, ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel for reduction in both mortality and stent thrombosis in unselected invasively managed ACS patients. In STEMI patients, both ticagrelor and prasugrel were associated with lower mortality compared with clopidogrel, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of stent thrombosis.

The risk and benefit of GP-IIb/IIIa Inhibition (GPI) in combination with recent antiplatelet regimens in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain unassessed. The advent of fast-acting highly active oral P2Y12 inhibitors questions the additional value and risk of their association with GPI. We studied the effect of GPI in combination with prasugrel and ticagrelor, compared to clopidogrel on major bleeding in pivotal randomized controlled trials in the setting of ACS, using a meta-analytic approach. A similar analysis, further including the comparison of a double versus standard dose clopidogrel regimen, was performed for the risk of the primary efficacy endpoint. The combination of GPI and recent P2Y12 inhibitors was associated with a similar risk of bleeding as compared with GPI and the standard clopidogrel regimen (RR 0.92 [0.74; 1.13]). The benefit of recent regimens, including double dose clopidogrel, in reducing the primary ischemic endpoint (RR 0.86 [0.78; 0.94]) persisted in those treated with GPI. Although GPI use was associated with a consistent increase in the risk of bleeding in both recent (RR 1.27 [1.05–1.55]) and standard regimens (RR 2.01 [1.64–2.47]), the relative magnitude of such an increase was lower in association with prasugrel or ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel. The risk of bleeding using a combination of GPI and oral antiplatelet regimens is mainly related to the use of GPI and not the oral antiplatelet regimen. Considering the absence of increased risk of bleeding and the persistence of the benefit of recent P2Y12 regimens in combination with GPI as compared with the standard clopidogrel regimen, the use of such a combination within the guidelines is supported by our findings.

Pharmacological inhibition of the platelet ADP-receptor P2Y 12 is a cornerstone in the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Thienopyridines such as clopidogrel and prasugrel exert their antithrombotic effect by means of active metabolites that irreversibly inhibit P2Y 12 . Due to the short half-life of these metabolites, a subpopulation of ADP-responsive platelets will form in between dosing. With increased platelet turnover rate or poor patient compliance, the fraction of ADP-responsive platelets will increase, potentially increasing the risk for new thrombotic events. In contrast, the reversible P2Y 12 inhibition produced by direct-acting ADP blockers such as ticagrelor and cangrelor inhibit the entire platelet population. In this study, we evaluated the impact of these pharmacological differences on thrombus formation in an ex vivo flow chamber model. A customized image analysis pipeline was used for automatized, large-scale identification and tracking of single platelets incorporated into the thrombus, enabling quantitative analysis of the relative contribution of inhibited and uninhibited platelets to thrombus growth and consolidation. Comparative experiments were conducted using the irreversible and reversible P2Y 12 inhibitors prasugrel active metabolite (PAM) and ticagrelor, respectively. Our results show that PAM inhibited thrombus platelet recruitment more gradually than ticagrelor, with a slower onset of inhibition. Further, we show that the presence of a small fraction (<10%) of uninhibited platelets did not abrogate the antithrombotic effect of PAM to any significant extent. Finally, we demonstrate a gradual enrichment of inhibited platelets in the thrombus shell due to selective recruitment of inhibited platelets to the thrombus periphery.

Residual high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has emerged as a predictor of major ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), especially after an acute cardiovascular event. However, its determinants are still poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of the percentage of reticulated platelets on HTPR in patients on DAPT with ASA (100–160 mg) and prasugrel (10 mg). Platelet reactivity and the reticulated platelets fraction (immature platelets fraction [IPF]) were assessed at 30–90 days after an acute coronary syndrome. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HTPR was defined as ADP test > 417 AU × min. Our population is represented by 180 ACS patients undergoing stent implantation, divided according to median values of IPF (< or ≥ 2.8%). Higher IPF values were associated to lower platelet count (p < 0.001) and a higher rate of active smokers (p = 0.02). No difference was observed in terms of mean platelet reactivity, with different activating stimuli. The prevalence of HTPR on prasugrel did not significantly differ in patients with IPF < or ≥ 2.8% (8%vs. 11.8%, p = 0.46; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.89 [0.66–5.4], p = 0.24). Our study showed that in patients treated with prasugrel after PCI for ACS, the immature platelet fraction influences neither platelet reactivity nor the rate of HTPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We performed this study to observe the effects of different doses of ticagrelor and standard-dose clopidogrel on platelet reactivity and endothelial function in diabetic patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Sixty type 2 diabetic patients were assigned to one-quarter standard-dose ticagrelor, half standard-dose ticagrelor, standard-dose ticagrelor and standard-dose clopidogrel groups. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and VerifyNow assay were used to measure platelet function. Endothelial function was assessed by measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels were detected. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) examined the Interleukin-8(IL-8) and IL-10. The results suggested that the one-quarter dose (34.0%± 14.7%), half-dose (26.9%± 11.6%) and standard-dose (17.3%± 10.3%) ticagrelor showed lower platelet aggregation rate than clopidogrel (52.8%± 18.3%; P ＜0.0001). PRU values in three ticagrelor groups were lower than that in clopidogrel group (102 (76–184)；75 (33–88)；38 (11–52) versus 194 (138–271) and；P ＜0.0001). FMD levels were higher in ticagrelor groups compared with baseline levels while lower in clopidogrel group after treatment. However, no significant differences were found in the percentage increase in the FMD between ticagrelor groups and clopidogrel group. The levels of VWF after treatment were lower than the baseline levels, but there was no statistically significant difference between ticagrelor group and clopidogrel group after treatment. The concentration of IL-8 and IL-10 were decreased in patients with half and standard-dose ticagrelor group. In conclusion, one-quarter standard-dose ticagrelor produced similar inhibitory effects on platelet aggregation as standard-dose clopidogrel in diabetic patients with stable CAD. The half standard-dose ticagrelor had a similar inhibitory effect on platelet inhibition as standard-dose ticagrelor, which was stronger than that of clopidogrel. Moreover, the half-dose ticagrelor had equal protection of endothelial function and inhibition of inflammatory factor as standard-dose ticagrelor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) study, the P2Y12 inhibitors ticagrelor and clopidogrel were compared in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Ticagrelor was shown to reduce occurrence of the primary end point – a composite of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke – compared to clopidogrel. Ticagrelor's pleiotropic effects on reuptake of adenosine via inhibition of equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) have been hypothesized to contribute to this. Several polymorphisms of ENT1 are known to exist. We explored the interaction between ENT1 polymorphisms and clinical outcomes in ACS patients participating in the PLATO genetic substudy. Using genotyping data obtained in a genome-wide association study, the gene region encoding ENT1 was assessed and 94 polymorphisms were identified. After quality control filtering, data from 9943 participants were included. Subjects were divided into discovery (phase 1, n = 3970) and replication (phase 2, n = 5973) cohorts. Cox-regression analysis of the relationship between variants and seven efficacy and safety outcomes was performed in discovery, replication, and combined cohorts. Treatment–marker interactions were also determined. Although 35 variants were found with associations to the investigated outcomes reaching p < 0.05 in the discovery cohort, only one of these was replicated in phase 2 of the analysis and also reached the predetermined level of statistical significance in the combined data, taking into account the number of tests performed: the rare polymorphism rs141034817, with a frequency of 0.2%, was significantly associated with bleeding. Thirty-three treatment–marker interactions were found with a significance level of p < 0.05 in phase 1, but none was replicated in phase 2. We found no significant interaction between ENT1 genotype and clinical outcomes in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel, apart from the association between a rare polymorphism and bleeding that requires further study. If ticagrelor's pleiotropic effects on adenosine uptake are clinically relevant, these do not appear to be significantly affected by variation in the ENT1 gene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platelet hyperaggregation and hypercoagulation are associated with increase of thrombogenic risk, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). High activity of P2Y12 receptor is found in T2D patients, exposing such patients to a prothrombotic condition. P2Y12 is a promising target for antiplatelet, but due to P2Y12 receptor constitutive activation, the clinical practical phenomena such as "clopidogrel resistance" are commonly occurring. In this study, we investigate the role of lncRNA on platelet activation. By lncRNA array, we screened thousands of differentially expressed lncRNA in megakaryocytes from T2D patients and confirmed that lncRNA metallothionein 1 pseudogene 3 (MT1P3) was significantly upregulated in megakaryocytes from T2D patients than in healthy controls. And we further investigate the biofunction of MT1P3 on platelet activation and the regulatory mechanism on p2y12. MT1P3 was positively correlated with p2y12 mRNA levels and promoted p2y12 expression by sponging miR-126. Knockdown of MT1P3 by siRNA reduced p2y12 expression, inhibiting platelet activation and aggregation in diabetes animal model. In conclusion, our findings identify MT1P3 as a key regulator in platelet activation by increasing p2y12 expression through sponging miR-126 under T2D condition. These findings may provide a new insight for managing platelet hyperactivity-related diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is a mainstay of the prevention of stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the 2015 European guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), prasugrel (PRA) and ticagrelor (TICA) combined with aspirin are recommended as first-line therapy. Clopidogrel (CLO) is recommended as an alternative medication for patients with contradictions to these new drugs. This single-center study analyzed the platelet function of 809 ACS patients undergoing PCI and treatment with DAPT. The platelet response to ADP was determined using Multiplate® analyzer at a median of 3 days after PCI in 254 patients treated with PRA (loading dose [LD] 60 mg, 10 mg qd), 162 patients receiving TICA (LD 180 mg, D 90 mg bid), and 393 CLO-treated patients (LD 600 mg, 75 mg qd). An aggregation >468 arbitrary units (AU)*min was defined as "high on-treatment platelet reactivity" (HPR), <188 AU*min as "low on-treatment platelet reactivity" (LPR). Platelet response in PRA-treated patients was lower compared to CLO or TICA (median; interquartile range: PRA 220 [163-275] AU*min vs. CLO 268 [186-387] AU*min, p < 0.001 vs. TICA 245 [190-320] AU*min, p = 0.001). Only 1.6% of PRA patients were stratified as HPR and 34.6% as LPR, while in the TICA group 1.9% fulfilled the criteria of HPR and 24.1% criteria of LPR. Sixteen percent of CLO patients were stratified as HPR and 26.2% as LPR. In a real-world cohort of ACS patients following PCI, PRA results in more potent inhibition of platelet function compared to CLO and TICA. TICA achieves a consistent antiplatelet effect with reduced rates of HPR and LPR in relation to CLO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Measurement of P-selectin on activated platelets as a means of measuring platelet function utilizing the technology described here has the advantage of not requiring immediate access to specialist equipment and expertise. Blood samples are activated, fixed, stored, and transported to a central laboratory for flow cytometric analysis. Here we have compared P-selectin with other more traditional approaches to measuring platelet function in blood and/or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from patients with acute coronary syndromes on treatment for at least 1 month with either aspirin and clopidogrel or aspirin with prasugrel. The comparators were light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow and Multiplate aggregometry (for determining the effects of aspirin) and LTA, VerifyNow and Multiplate together with the BioCytex VASP phosphorylation assay (for the P2Y12 antagonists). The P-selectin Aspirin Test revealed substantial inhibition of platelet function in all but three of 96 patients receiving aspirin with clopidogrel and in none of 51 patients receiving aspirin and prasugrel. The results were very similar to those obtained using LTA. There was only one patient with high residual platelet aggregation and low P-selectin expression. The same patients identified as "non-responders" to aspirin also presented with the highest residual platelet activity as measured using the VerifyNow system, although not quite as well separated from the other values. With the Multiplate test only one of these patients clearly stood out from the others. The results obtained using the P-selectin P2Y12 Test in 102 patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel were similar to the more traditional approaches in that a wide scatter of results was obtained. Generally, high values seen with the P-selectin P2Y12 Test were also high with the LTA, VerifyNow, Multiplate, and BioCytex VASP P2Y12 Tests. Similarly, low residual platelet function using the P2Y12 test was seen irrespective of the testing procedure used. However, there were differences in some patients. Prasugrel was always more effective than clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet function with none of 56 patients (P-selectin and VerifyNow), only 2 of 56 patients (Multiplate) and only 3 of 56 patients (Biocytex VASP) demonstrating high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) defined using previously published cut-off values. The exception was LTA where there were 11 of 56 patients with HRPR. It remains to be seen which experimental approach provides the most useful information regarding outcomes after adjusting therapies in treated patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platelets are traditionally considered to be essential components of primary hemostasis. Recent investigations have revealed that platelets can be activated in patients with sepsis and are implicated in the development of sepsis and sepsis-induced-acute kidney injury (SAKI). In the present study, ticagrelor was used to induce a mouse model of SAKI by cecal ligation and puncture. It was found that ticagrelor could inhibit platelet activity, decrease the levels of interleukin-1β and serum creatinine, reduce infiltration of neutrophils in renal tissue, and attenuate cell apoptosis in the kidney. The results suggested that ticagrelor could protect renal function by inhibiting inflammation, recruitment of neutrophils into the kidney, and cell apoptosis in renal tissue. Thus, the findings might provide new strategies for preventing SAKI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given that patients with prior myocardial infarction and features of high ischemic and low bleeding risk may benefit by extending dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year, we aimed of assessing platelet reactivity provided by ticagrelor 60 mg bid versus prasugrel 5 mg od in 20 such patients participating in a randomized, crossover study. The primary end point of platelet reactivity at the end of the two treatment periods (by VerifyNow, in PRU) was significantly lower for ticagrelor (31.9 PRU [95% CI 12.3–51.4]) compared with prasugrel (132.1 PRU [111.9–152.3]) with a least squares mean difference of –100.2 PRU (72.1–128.3, P <.001). This dedicated pharmacodynamic study showed that in post-myocardial infarction patients with high atherothrombotic risk and receiving P2Y12 receptor antagonist beyond 1 year, low-dose ticagrelor results in a significantly lower platelet reactivity compared to low-dose prasugrel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vascular diseases such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke are associated with increased platelet function whilst the risk of recurrence is reduced by antiplatelet agents such as aspirin, clopidogrel, and prasugrel. However, some patients exhibit high platelet reactivity, especially with clopidogrel. Existing platelet function tests may not be ideal in that they can be expensive, are often time consuming, and measurements must be made near to the patient and within a few hours of blood collection. Platelet activation leads to translocation of P-selectin from alpha-granules to the cell surface. Following activation with arachidonic acid (which is blocked by aspirin) or adenosine diphosphate (inhibited by clopidogrel) and fixation, samples may be stored or posted to a laboratory performing flow cytometric quantification of platelet P-selectin expression. Acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke are associated with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel in 6-58% of patients when assessed with P-selectin expression, and high reactivity was associated with an increased risk of recurrence after myocardial infarction. Use of P-selectin expression tests may also be of relevance to surgical and veterinary practice and the diagnosis of mild bleeding disorders. The present review explores this topic in further detail. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Three oral platelet P2Y12inhibitors, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, are available for reducing the risk of cardiovascular death and stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to compare the efficacy of these antiplatelet drugs in contemporary practice. Data were collected for 10 793 consecutive ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography at Sheffield, UK (2009–2015). Since prasugrel use was mostly restricted to the STEMI subgroup, clopidogrel and ticagrelor were compared for all ACS patients, and all three agents were compared in the STEMI subgroup. Differences in outcomes were evaluated at 12 months by KM curves and log-rank test after adjustment for independent risk factors. Of 10 793 patients with ACS (36% STEMI), 43% (4653) received clopidogrel, 11% (1223) prasugrel and 46% (4917) ticagrelor, with aspirin for all. In the overall group, ticagrelor was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel (adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 0.82, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.71–0.96,p= 0.01). In the STEMI subgroup, both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with a lower mortality compared with clopidogrel (prasugrel vs. clopidogrel: adjHR 0.65, CI 0.48–0.89,p= 0.007; ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel: adjHR 0.70, CI 0.61–0.99,p= 0.05). Of the 7595 patients who underwent PCI, 78 (1.0%) had definite stent thrombosis by 12 months. Patients treated with ticagrelor had a lower incidence of definite stent thrombosis compared with clopidogrel (0.6% vs. 1.1%; adjHR 0.51, CI 0.29–0.89,p= 0.03). In the STEMI subgroup, there was no significant difference between the three groups (ticagrelor 1.0%, clopidogrel = 1.5%, prasugrel = 1.6%;p= 0.29). In conclusion, ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel for reduction in both mortality and stent thrombosis in unselected invasively managed ACS patients. In STEMI patients, both ticagrelor and prasugrel were associated with lower mortality compared with clopidogrel, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of stent thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The risk and benefit of GP-IIb/IIIa Inhibition (GPI) in combination with recent antiplatelet regimens in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain unassessed. The advent of fast-acting highly active oral P2Y12 inhibitors questions the additional value and risk of their association with GPI. We studied the effect of GPI in combination with prasugrel and ticagrelor, compared to clopidogrel on major bleeding in pivotal randomized controlled trials in the setting of ACS, using a meta-analytic approach. A similar analysis, further including the comparison of a double versus standard dose clopidogrel regimen, was performed for the risk of the primary efficacy endpoint. The combination of GPI and recent P2Y12 inhibitors was associated with a similar risk of bleeding as compared with GPI and the standard clopidogrel regimen (RR 0.92 [0.74; 1.13]). The benefit of recent regimens, including double dose clopidogrel, in reducing the primary ischemic endpoint (RR 0.86 [0.78; 0.94]) persisted in those treated with GPI. Although GPI use was associated with a consistent increase in the risk of bleeding in both recent (RR 1.27 [1.05–1.55]) and standard regimens (RR 2.01 [1.64–2.47]), the relative magnitude of such an increase was lower in association with prasugrel or ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel. The risk of bleeding using a combination of GPI and oral antiplatelet regimens is mainly related to the use of GPI and not the oral antiplatelet regimen. Considering the absence of increased risk of bleeding and the persistence of the benefit of recent P2Y12 regimens in combination with GPI as compared with the standard clopidogrel regimen, the use of such a combination within the guidelines is supported by our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allergic reactions to clopidogrel soon after coronary stent implantation pose an important and challenging clinical problem. We describe a 44-year-old man who developed a diffuse maculopapular rash four days after initiation of clopidogrel with drug-eluting coronary stent placement. An initial treat-through strategy was unsuccessful due to patient intolerance to corticosteroids. Because of persistent hypersensitivity, clopidogrel was substituted with prasugrel which was continued successfully for one year without reaction. A systematic review of the literature was performed which identified 10 prior case reports of patients with clopidogrel hypersensitivity who were subsequently treated with prasugrel. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of these patients plus the current case were reviewed. There were 9 men and 2 women with ages from 44 to 76 years. All patients had undergone coronary stent procedures. Prasugrel was successfully used without cross-reactivity in 9 of the 11 patients (82%). Cross-reactivity was reported in two patients who developed hypersensitivity reactions to prasugrel similar to those experienced on clopidogrel. In conclusion, prasugrel can be used successfully in most patients with a history of clopidogrel hypersensitivity. However, potential cross-reactivity between these two thienopyridines may occur in some patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel are at high risk for adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of the ISAR-ADAPT-PF study was to assess the antiplatelet efficacy of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with HTPR on clopidogrel. In a prospective and randomized clinical study, 70 patients with HTPR on clopidogrel loading dose (LD) within 24 h post PCI were assigned to receive either ticagrelor [180 mg LD followed by 90 mg maintenance dose (MD) twice daily] or prasugrel (60 mg LD followed by 10 mg MD once daily). The adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation assessed on the Multiplate analyzer on day 2 after randomization (primary end point) was as follows: the mean difference between the two treatment groups was 6 aggregation units (AU) × min with an upper 95% confidence interval (CI) of 41 AU × min, which was greater than the predefined noninferiority margin of 18 AU × min (P for noninferiority = 0.29). However, no significant differences in absolute platelet reactivity levels between ticagrelor- versus prasugrel-treated patients at that time point were observed (138 ± 100 AU × min vs. 132 ± 64 AU × min, P for superiority = 0.77). In conclusion, neither drug was statistically more effective for inhibition of platelet aggregation in patients with HTPR on clopidogrel post PCI, although the study could not formally demonstrate the assumed noninferiority of ticagrelor versus prasugrel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Testing of P2Y12-receptor antagonist effects can support clinical decision-making. However, most platelet function assays use only ADP as agonist which is not P2Y12-receptor specific. For this reason P2Y12-receptor specific assays have been developed by adding prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) to reduce ADP-induced platelet activation via the P2Y1-receptor. The present study sought to evaluate a P2Y12-receptor specific assay for determination of pharmacodynamic and clinical outcomes. This study enrolled 400 patients undergoing coronary stenting after loading with clopidogrel or prasugrel. ADP-induced platelet reactivity was assessed by whole blood aggregometry at multiple time points with a standard ADP assay (ADPtest) and a P2Y12-receptor specific assay (ADPtest HS, both run on Multiplate Analyzer, Roche Diagnostics). Patients were clinically followed for 1 month and all events adjudicated by an independent committee. In total, 2084 pairs of test results of ADPtest and ADPtest HS were available showing a strong correlation between results of both assays (r= 0.96,p< 0.001). These findings prevailed in multiple prespecified subgroups (e.g., age; body mass index; diabetes). Calculated cutoffs for ADPtest HS and the established cutoffs of ADPtest showed a substantial agreement for prediction of ischemic and hemorrhagic events with a Cohen’s κ of 0.66 and 0.66, respectively. The P2Y12-receptor specific ADPtest HS assay appears similarly predictive for pharmacodynamic and clinical outcomes as compared to the established ADPtest assay indicating its applicability for clinical use. Further evaluation in large cohorts is needed to determine if P2Y12-receptor specific testing offers any advantage for prediction of clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the pharmacodynamic efficacy of de-escalating P2Y12inhibition from prasugrel to clopidogrel based oncytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19genotyping, we genotyped 50 Korean patients with AMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) forCYP2C19 *2,*3, or *17using real-time PCR. They were discharged on prasugrel 10 mg daily. A control group of 48 AMI patients who underwent PCI and were discharged on clopidogrel but did not undergo genotyping was identified retrospectively. Based on genotyping results available at 3 weeks, 12 patients found to have 2 copies of eitherCYP2C19 *2or*3loss of function alleles continued prasugrel while the remaining 38 patients switched to clopidogrel 75 mg daily. The rate of patients within the therapeutic window (TW) of on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR), 85

The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of platelet reactivity values in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor. This prospective observational study enrolled 200 patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Platelet aggregation was determined by multiple electrode aggregometry after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the maintenance phase of treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Only 3% of patients in the prasugrel group and 2% of study participants in the ticagrelor group had high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). The majority of patients displayed low on treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR; prasugrel: 69%; ticagrelor: 64%). The pharmacodynamic effect was similar in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor: the median level of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was 15U (interquartile range IQR 9-21U) under prasugrel treatment and 17U (IQR 8–24U) under ticagrelor treatment (p=0.370). In conclusion, our study suggests that there is some degree of variability in ADP-induced platelet aggregation under treatment with prasugrel and ticagrelor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cangrelor is a rapid-acting, direct-binding, and reversible P2Y12antagonist which has been studied for use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with or without pretreatment with an oral P2Y12antagonist. As cangrelor is administered intravenously, it is necessary to switch to an oral P2Y12antagonist following PCI, such as the thienopyridines clopidogrel, and prasugrel or the non-pyridine ticagrelor. Previous studies have suggested a negative pharmacodynamic interaction between cangrelor and thienopyridines. Thisin vitrostudy evaluated the receptor-level interaction between cangrelor and the active metabolite (AM) of clopidogrel or prasugrel by assessing functional P2Y12receptor number using a33P-2MeSADP binding assay. All P2Y12antagonists studied resulted in strong P2Y12receptor blockade (cangrelor: 93.6%; clopidogrel AM: 93.0%; prasugrel AM: 97.9%). Adding a thienopyridine AM in the presence of cangrelor strongly reduces P2Y12receptor blockade by the AM (clopidogrel AM: 7%, prasugrel AM: 3.2%). The thienopyridine AMs had limited ability to compete with cangrelor for binding to P2Y12(% P2Y12receptor blockade after co-incubation with cangrelor 1000 nmol/L: 11.7% for clopidogrel AM 3 µmol/L; 34.1% for prasugrel AM 3 µmol/L). In conclusion,in vitrocangrelor strongly inhibits the binding of clopidogrel and prasugrel AMs to the P2Y12receptor, consistent with the previous observation of a negative pharmacodynamic interaction. Care may need to be taken to not overlap exposure to thienopyridine AMs and cangrelor in order to reduce the risk of thrombotic complications following PCI. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Despite the demonstrated benefits of Prasugrel, a new generation thienopyridine, in the prevention of thrombotic complications after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), its use is still precluded to those many patients arriving to the cath lab pre-treated with Clopidogrel. Conclusive data on the strategy of switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel are still missing, therefore we aimed to perform a meta-analysis of current studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel (PS) as compared to a standard thienopyridine therapy with Clopidogrel or Prasugrel in patients undergoing PCI. Literature archives and main scientific sessions’ abstracts were scanned for studies comparing a switching strategy from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel vs. Prasugrel or Clopidogrel. Primary efficacy endpoint was overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were: non-fatal myocardial infarction and definite/probable stent thrombosis. Safety endpoint was the rate of major bleedings according to a per-protocol definition. A total of 12 studies, involving 3956 patients, were included. Among them, 1396 patients (35.3%), received Prasugrel after a Clopidogrel treatment (PS), while 2560 (64.7%) received either Prasugrel or Clopidogrel. The switch from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel was in the majority of the studies periprocedural. The mortality was numerically lower, but not statistically significant, in the PS group as compared with patients who did not switch (1.7% vs. 3.8%, OR [95% CI] = 0.68 [0.40,1.15],p = 0.15,phet = 0.61), without any relationship with patients’ risk profile (r = −0.68 [−2.09, 0.73],p = 0.35). Similar results were obtained for secondary efficacy endpoints and at sensitivity analysis in the majority of subgroups evaluated. Moreover, the PS strategy did not increase major bleedings as compared with standard therapy (1.4% vs. 2.5%, OR [95% CI = 0.70 [0.39, 1.25],p = 0.23,phet = 0.6). The present meta-analysis confirms that, among patients undergoing PCI, switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel may be safely performed and therefore should be encouraged among patients eligible to Prasugrel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In addition to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), a number of platelet function tests including the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (VN-P2Y12) employ prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) to improve specificity for P2Y12 blockade by mitigating the contribution of the P2Y1 pathway on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation. Using short thromboelastography (s-TEG), we have previously shown that VN-P2Y12 overestimates the functional effect of clopidogrel in some individuals. We investigated whether PGE1 systematically increases the inhibitory effects of P2Y12 blockade on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation in anin vitromodel. Using s-TEG, we measured ADP-induced platelet aggregation either in the presence or absence of PGE1 (11 or 22 nM) in blood samples taken from healthy volunteers pre-incubated with prasugrel active metabolite (PAM; 0, 1, 3 or 10 µM). Individually, both PGE1 (p < 0.02) and PAM (p < 0.0001) inhibited ADP-mediated platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent manner, as expected. Furthermore, inclusion of PGE1 augmented inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet aggregation in response to PAM (p < 0.02) in a dose-dependent manner such that a 10-fold higher dose of PAM was required to attain equivalent inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet aggregation to that achieved by 1 µM PAM in the presence of 11 nM PGE1. In conclusion, PGE1 potentiates the anti-aggregatory effects of P2Y12 blockade on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation. Assays that employ PGE1 with ADP may therefore overestimate therapeutic response to prasugrel in a proportion of individuals, potentially making them unsuitable candidates for guiding delivery of personalized antiplatelet therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Aim: To investigate whether an intensified antiplatelet regimen could improve prognosis in stable or non-ST elevation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients exhibiting high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is a wide variability in the platelet reactivity to clopidogrel and HTPR has been associated with a poor prognosis.Methods: In this observational study, 923 consecutive patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and adequately pre-treated with clopidogrel were screened for HTPR with multiple electrode aggregometry after assessment of the coronary anatomy. Patients were grouped based on their response to clopidogrel and the assigned antiplatelet strategy. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis.Results: HTPR was demonstrated in 237 patients (25.7%). Of these, 114 continued on conventional clopidogrel therapy, while the remaining 123 received intensified antiplatelet therapy with either double-dose clopidogrel (150 mg daily,n = 55) or the newer P2Y12-inhibitors, prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 68) for at least 30 days after the index procedure. The median follow-up was 571 days (interquartile range, 373–746). Intensifying antiplatelet therapy reduced the rate of the composite endpoint (p < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, HTPR in combination with conventional clopidogrel therapy remained independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio (HR), 2.92; 95% CI, 1.90–4.48), whereas intensified treatment reduced the risk to a level equivalent to that of patients exhibiting normal platelet reactivity (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.59–1.99).Conclusion: Tailored antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the event rate in patients exhibiting HTPR prior to PCI. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Decreased plasma levels of microRNA-223 (miR-223), predominantly of platelet origin, were proposed as a surrogate marker of efficacy of antiplatelet therapy. However, higher on-treatment platelet reactivity was associated with lower plasma miR-223 in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) including clopidogrel and aspirin. Our aim was to compare plasma miR-223 and platelet reactivity in CAD patients on DAPT with newer P2Y12antagonists vs. clopidogrel. We studied 21 men with CAD admitted to our centre owing to a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, and with an uncomplicated hospital course. From the day of admission, the patients were receiving either clopidogrel (n = 11) or prasugrel/ticagrelor (n = 10) in addition to aspirin. Before discharge, miR-223 expression in plasma was estimated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using the comparative Ct method relative to miR-16 as an endogenous control. Multiple electrode aggregometry was used to assess platelet aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP). ADP-induced platelet reactivity was decreased in the patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with those on clopidogrel (mean ± SD: 139 ± 71 vs. 313 ± 162 arbitrary units [AU]*min,p = 0.006), due to a more potent antiplatelet activity of the novel P2Y12antagonists. Consequently, six out of seven patients in the lower tertile of the ADP-induced platelet aggregation were treated with the newer P2Y12blockers, whereas six out of seven patients in the upper tertile were on clopidogrel. Plasma miR-223 was elevated with decreasing platelet reactivity (Spearman’s rho = –0.52;p = 0.015 for trend), being significantly higher in the lower tertile of the ADP-induced platelet aggregation (median [range]: 1.06 [0.25–2.31]) vs. the upper tertile (0.20 [0.13–2.30]) (p = 0.04). In conclusion, our preliminary results argue against the notion of low plasma miR-223 as a marker of platelet responsiveness to DAPT. On the contrary, more potent platelet inhibition associated mainly with newer P2Y12antagonists appears to coincide with higher miR-223 relative to the subjects with attenuated responsiveness to DAPT. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Platelet P2Y12 inhibitors have become a central component of the treatment strategy for patients with atherothrombosis due to the importance of platelet P2Y12 receptors in arterial thrombosis. P2Y12 inhibitors effectively reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite this, patients with ACS continue to suffer from recurrent atherothrombosis and an increased risk of mortality. In addition, P2Y12 inhibitors increase the risk of bleeding, thereby limiting their clinical benefit. It is therefore clear that further optimizations are needed in the pharmacology and treatment strategies of P2Y12 inhibitors. The objective of these optimizations is to maximize cardiovascular benefit whilst minimizing adverse effects on haemostasis. This review article summarizes the most successful recent strategies in P2Y12 inhibition in order to identify the optimizations and developments that are most likely to be successful in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platelets of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) show evidence of mild activation in the non-crisis steady state and greater activation during vaso-occlusive crises (VOC). Prasugrel, a potent inhibitor of ADP-mediated platelet activation and aggregation, may be useful in attenuating VOC. We compared platelet responses to ADP stimulation in patients with SCD and healthy subjects before and after treatment with prasugrel. In a phase 1 study, platelet biomarker levels were assessed in 12 adult patients with SCD and 13 healthy subjects before and after 12 ± 2 days of 5.0 or 7.5 mg/day prasugrel. The following were determined in whole blood samples stimulated with 20 µM ADP: (i) percentages of monocytes and neutrophils with adherent platelets (cell-platelet aggregates); (ii) the relative number (mass) of platelets associated with each monocyte and neutrophil as reported by CD61 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the monocyte-platelet and neutrophil-platelet aggregates; (iii) the percentages of platelets positive for surface expression of CD40 ligand (CD40L), P-selectin (CD62p) and activated glycoprotein IIb-IIIa (GPIIb-IIIa); and (iv) the percentages of platelets and monocyte-platelet aggregates positive for surface tissue factor (TF) expression. At baseline, there were no significant differences between cohorts in the percentages of platelets expressing activation biomarkers. Following 12 days of prasugrel administration, the percentages of platelets expressing activation biomarkers following ADP stimulation were reduced in both cohorts, and there were no significant differences between groups. Both patients with SCD and healthy subjects had significant reductions in the monocyte-platelet and neutrophil-platelet aggregate MFI and the percentage of platelets expressing P-selectin and activated GPIIb-IIIa (all p < 0.05). Healthy subjects also had significant reductions in monocyte-platelet aggregate percentages ( p = 0.004), neutrophil-platelet aggregate percentages ( p = 0.011) and the percentage of CD40L-positive platelets ( p = 0.044) that were not observed in patients with SCD. Prasugrel administration to SCD patients attenuates ex vivo ADP-stimulated platelet activation as measured by the percentage of platelets positive for P-selectin and GPIIb-IIIa, thus reducing the proportion of platelets that may participate in aggregates. Furthermore, prasugrel decreases ex vivo ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation with monocytes and neutrophils as measured by the monocyte-platelet and neutrophil-platelet aggregate MFI. This implies that in the presence of prasugrel, fewer platelets adhere to monocytes and neutrophils, which may result in reducing cell-platelet aggregate size. Therefore, reduced platelet reactivity and decreased size of leukocyte-platelet aggregates suggest additional mechanisms by which prasugrel may provide benefit to patients with SCD and support further investigation of possible therapeutic benefits of prasugrel in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Managing bleeding in patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitors is challenging. Few data are available regarding the efficacy of platelet transfusion in patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimal amount of platelet supplementation (in terms of ratio of non-inhibited platelets to inhibited platelets) necessary to restore platelet reactivity in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) of patients treated with aspirin and a prasugrel or ticagrelor loading dose for an acute coronary syndrome. PRP samples from patients were mixed ex vivo with increasing proportions of pooled PRP from healthy volunteers. Platelet reactivity was challenged with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid, collagen or thrombin receptor activating peptide using light transmission aggregometry. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patient samples recovering an ADP-induced maximal aggregation (ADP-Aggmax) value above 40%. In patients treated with prasugrel ( n = 32), ADP-Aggmax increased progressively with supplements of pooled PRP, with an average increase of 7.9% (95% CI [7.1; 8.8], p < 0.001) per each 20% increase in the ratio of non-inhibited platelets to inhibited platelets. A ratio of 60% was associated with 90% of patients reaching the primary endpoint. In patients treated with ticagrelor ( n = 15), ADP-Aggmax did not significantly increase with any level of supplements. In conclusions, e x vivo addition of non-inhibited platelets significantly improved ADP-Aggmax in patients treated with prasugrel with a dose-dependent effect. There was no evidence of such a reversal in patients treated with ticagrelor. These results suggest that platelet transfusion may be more effective in blunting bleeding in patients treated with prasugrel, than those treated with ticagrelor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]